ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 November 2008, 02:28 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Don
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 12
|
All Original?
Opinions, comments please..... 1954 6294?
What can you tell me about this one? Thanks! |
11 November 2008, 02:37 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: STAN
Location: KY-USA
Watch: Rolex Prez
Posts: 12,583
|
...mmmmmmmm.....
...looks good except that the dial may be a refi.
...these dials usually had an actual little metal crown on the dial. ...other than that, looks okay. Stan. |
11 November 2008, 01:38 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Terry Newton
Location: Michigan
Watch: Rolex TT GMT II c
Posts: 6,644
|
What's the problem around the cyclops? Looks like glue.
Terry Newton
__________________
Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth "Z" SS Date Submariner "Z" TT GMT-Master IIc |
6 March 2009, 03:06 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: California
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 1
|
I just bought one--same vintage--without cyclops. Is my crystal original?
|
6 March 2009, 03:17 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Dave
Location: Australia
Watch: DJ16233TT
Posts: 18,485
|
Looks like most of the crystal had a recent polished to remove scratches and they have missed around the cyclops, might be a home job polish, aren't the crystals on these acrylic/plastic?
__________________
Apprentice to Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.