ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Chrisjktopher · 6 March 2020, 08:56 PM

Hi guys just want to make sure this bracelet is authentic from 07. Thank you...

BillA · 6 March 2020, 11:07 PM

Others will have to chime in who know more than me but here is my thought:

I count 10 links, you are missing either 2 or 3 links. In fact for that year, you should have a total of 13 links as mine does. I have a D serial (year 2005).
For a 2007 model, I thought it should be stamped 93250A not 93250, I think the difference has to do with solid end links.
While I think the bracelet is real, I wonder if it has been swopped out for a different years bracelet. I have a D serial Expl II, and compared it to mine. Mine is stamped 93250A. I am not 100% sure.

Chrisjktopher · 7 March 2020, 04:26 AM

Yes noticed the missing links and I have seen some 07 with 93250 and 93250a as you mentioned so just want to be certain with the stamping/engravings

Chrisjktopher · 7 March 2020, 04:35 AM

Bump help anybody else?

thesharkfactor · 7 March 2020, 06:50 AM

Its fake. That's a common fake code E06. The poor stamping on the blades gives it away and the fliplock rest area of the clasp is not like genuine and the underside of the fliplocker itself looks like it's polished, it should be all brushed.

garyk · 7 March 2020, 06:55 AM

wow, bummer...

freefly · 7 March 2020, 07:21 AM

No good.

Chrisjktopher · 7 March 2020, 07:36 AM

Really what gives it away..

Chrisjktopher · 7 March 2020, 07:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thesharkfactor

Its fake. That's a common fake code E06. The poor stamping on the blades gives it away and the fliplock rest area of the clasp is not like genuine and the underside of the fliplocker itself looks like it's polished, it should be all brushed.

Awesome thank you!!!

Chrisjktopher · 7 March 2020, 07:37 AM

Should always go with first gut feeling :)

Chrisjktopher · 7 March 2020, 07:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freefly

No good.

Jk sharkfactor chimed in. Guess it’s a common E0 fake. Good to know. Thanks.

thesharkfactor · 7 March 2020, 08:07 AM

You're welcome.

freefly · 7 March 2020, 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrisjktopher

Jk sharkfactor chimed in. Guess it’s a common E0 fake. Good to know. Thanks.

No prob. Weird that I was first to reply, but now there are a bunch of replies ahead of mine.
You must have had several posts with the same question/topic going at once (and merged into one by mods).
Usually one thread per topic will do.

BillA · 8 March 2020, 03:11 AM

I will defer to others on the E06 stamping, but the rest of the bracelet looks OK to me. I compared it to mine, looks very very close.

Edit: I looked a little closer to the number of holes on the clasp, the picture shows 9 holes, mine has 7, so I think the clasp is fake. Also on the mini-lock piece I will call it, your picture has a dimple on the outside, mine does not.

GGGMT · 8 March 2020, 04:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BillA

I will defer to others on the E06 stamping, but the rest of the bracelet looks OK to me. I compared it to mine, looks very very close.

Edit: I looked a little closer to the number of holes on the clasp, the picture shows 9 holes, mine has 7, so I think the clasp is fake. Also on the mini-lock piece I will call it, your picture has a dimple on the outside, mine does not.

Yours looks like a 78790A? Different buckle

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

GLADIATOR · 8 March 2020, 06:02 AM

EO6
Is also a genuine date - that does not make it fake
Lets see a photo of the engraving on inside of the end links
A

BillA · 8 March 2020, 06:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GGGMT

Yours looks like a 78790A? Different buckle

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes, mine is 78790A

freefly · 8 March 2020, 06:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GLADIATOR

EO6
Is also a genuine date - that does not make it fake
Lets see a photo of the engraving on inside of the end links
A

True. However, that was not the deciding factor here. The bracelet is 100% junk. No need for further pics.

GLADIATOR · 8 March 2020, 06:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freefly

True. However, that was not the deciding factor here. The bracelet is 100% junk. No need for further pics.

Hi Eric
Just wanted to make clear EO6 can be authentic.

I have my suspicions on the bracelet, but for me anyway, I need to see the engraving to decide.

BillA · 8 March 2020, 07:15 AM

What makes the bracelet a fake?

freefly · 8 March 2020, 07:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BillA

What makes the bracelet a fake?

Quite a few "tells" that stand out like a sore thumb (and no need to expound further than that).

BillA · 8 March 2020, 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freefly

Quite a few "tells" that stand out like a sore thumb (and no need to expound further than that).

I am sorry you feel that way. I and perhaps others would like to learn. I do not think it violates forum policy.

GLADIATOR · 8 March 2020, 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BillA

I am sorry you feel that way. I and perhaps others would like to learn. I do not think it violates forum policy.

I too would like to know so conclusively
But
We learned here teaching others also teaches the scammers.
So I respect we don’t post reasons.

thesharkfactor · 8 March 2020, 07:41 PM

My post at No.5 explains why.

ThatExplorer · 9 March 2020, 02:18 AM

E06.... There are more E06 clasp codes then ever made, I see them all the time on the bay and Chrono.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

GGGMT · 9 March 2020, 04:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThatExplorer

E06.... There are more E06 clasp codes then ever made, I see them all the time on the bay and Chrono.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It was an outstanding year for bracelets, quite akin to 1947 or 2015 for champagne

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

6 March 2020, 08:56 PM	#1
Chrisjktopher "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2019 Location: Nyc Posts: 17	Please help verify bracelet 93250 Hi guys just want to make sure this bracelet is authentic from 07. Thank you... Attached Images

7 March 2020, 06:55 AM	#6
garyk 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Gary Location: USA Watch: Daytona Posts: 11,748	wow, bummer... __________________

8 March 2020, 03:11 AM	#14
BillA 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: US Posts: 3,877	I will defer to others on the E06 stamping, but the rest of the bracelet looks OK to me. I compared it to mine, looks very very close. Edit: I looked a little closer to the number of holes on the clasp, the picture shows 9 holes, mine has 7, so I think the clasp is fake. Also on the mini-lock piece I will call it, your picture has a dimple on the outside, mine does not. Attached Images

8 March 2020, 06:02 AM	#16
GLADIATOR "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: Adam Location: Costa Blanca, Watch: YMII,GMTII,DAYTONA Posts: 5,288	EO6 Is also a genuine date - that does not make it fake Lets see a photo of the engraving on inside of the end links A __________________ The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. Winston Churchill "We judge ourselves by what we feel capable of doing, while others judge us by what we have already done."

9 March 2020, 02:18 AM	#25
ThatExplorer "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2018 Real Name: Cory Location: US Watch: 114060 Posts: 652	Please help verify bracelet 93250 E06.... There are more E06 clasp codes then ever made, I see them all the time on the bay and Chrono. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. -------------------------------------------------------------- 116610-214270-116710-113700-114300-M79380RB-Zodiac GR

6 March 2020, 11:07 PM	#2
BillA 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: US Posts: 3,877	Others will have to chime in who know more than me but here is my thought: I count 10 links, you are missing either 2 or 3 links. In fact for that year, you should have a total of 13 links as mine does. I have a D serial (year 2005). For a 2007 model, I thought it should be stamped 93250A not 93250, I think the difference has to do with solid end links. While I think the bracelet is real, I wonder if it has been swopped out for a different years bracelet. I have a D serial Expl II, and compared it to mine. Mine is stamped 93250A. I am not 100% sure.

7 March 2020, 04:26 AM	#3
Chrisjktopher "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2019 Location: Nyc Posts: 17	Yes noticed the missing links and I have seen some 07 with 93250 and 93250a as you mentioned so just want to be certain with the stamping/engravings

7 March 2020, 04:35 AM	#4
Chrisjktopher "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2019 Location: Nyc Posts: 17	Bump help anybody else?

7 March 2020, 06:50 AM	#5
thesharkfactor "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Scotland Watch: GMT Posts: 3,643	Its fake. That's a common fake code E06. The poor stamping on the blades gives it away and the fliplock rest area of the clasp is not like genuine and the underside of the fliplocker itself looks like it's polished, it should be all brushed.

7 March 2020, 07:21 AM	#7
freefly "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: Eric Location: AZ Watch: 4&5-digit Sub/GMTs Posts: 1,974	No good.

7 March 2020, 07:36 AM	#8
Chrisjktopher "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2019 Location: Nyc Posts: 17	Really what gives it away..

7 March 2020, 07:37 AM	#10
Chrisjktopher "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2019 Location: Nyc Posts: 17	Should always go with first gut feeling :)

7 March 2020, 08:07 AM	#12
thesharkfactor "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Scotland Watch: GMT Posts: 3,643	You're welcome.

8 March 2020, 07:15 AM	#20
BillA 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: US Posts: 3,877	What makes the bracelet a fake?

8 March 2020, 07:41 PM	#24
thesharkfactor "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Scotland Watch: GMT Posts: 3,643	My post at No.5 explains why.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)