Submariner (without Date) Owners ...

[JWD531]

Originally Posted by BumbleB

Not true, then you would probably settle for an explorer or DJ.

The Sub is a classic that looks good in any collection. If you have many Rolexes with date then the Sub is a great addition to a collection.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Agreed. I want the Submariner some day to add to my collection, assuming it is still made when I am able to add it. If I ever get a Submariner Date, it will be with a blue or green dial. The Submariner date SS black dial is probably one of the last watches I would add to my collection.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Xtralarg]

Originally Posted by Handey0465

IMO, most people settle for the sub no-date because of price.....Not the "cleanliness" and "lack of cyclops"

Rubbish

[RolexWombat]

Originally Posted by Handey0465

IMO, most people settle for the sub no-date because of price.....Not the "cleanliness" and "lack of cyclops"

I would respectfully beg to differ. I would even go as far as say that most people that go for the Sub (as opposed to the Sub-date) do it for reasons other than the price difference.

[nr1416]

GMT and a Submariner are the perfect pair

Sent from my SM-G975W using Tapatalk

[Jlatreille]

I don’t own a Sub yet but I do own a blue dial DJ 16014. I am specifically waiting for the Sub from my AD. As much as I do like the cyclops on the 36mm DJ I prefer the look of the Sub without.

[Andrejb]

They both get close to an equal amount of wrist time. have been wearing the sub lately as a daily just because the colours and bracelet are a little more casual and understated. The GMT is on my wrist if I’m not at work, when I go for drinks etc

P.s. I also previously owned a SubC date, had it for a year. Once I got the BLRO I wanted to contrast it by having a watch without a cyclops, grab set and go.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[nr1416]

Here here

Sent from my SM-G975W using Tapatalk

[upsidedownbelt]

Originally Posted by RolexWombat

I would respectfully beg to differ. I would even go as far as say that most people that go for the Sub (as opposed to the Sub-date) do it for reasons other than the price difference.

If the date and non date were the same price I would bet sales would change very little.

[GradyPhilpott]

[GradyPhilpott]

Originally Posted by RolexWombat

I would respectfully beg to differ. I would even go as far as say that most people that go for the Sub (as opposed to the Sub-date) do it for reasons other than the price difference.

I don't know about most, but I bought my 14060M because that's the Submariner I wanted.

I did not settle. Yea, verily, I ordered mine from my AD and got one of the last five left in the United States just weeks before the 114060 was released at Basel.

My AD, who went on the hunt to find mine, was so shocked by the dearth of specimens, he bought one for himself.

[Bluside]

Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott

[INDENT]

Nice Sub. What's in the guitar case?

[Nikrnic]

I wouldn't take a Sub date over a Sub if they were the same price. It's not about the money but it was nice to save a k. I love both of mine 5&6 dgt. For a sports Rolex I'll save the dates for the Gmts..

Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk

[GradyPhilpott]

Originally Posted by Bluside

Nice Sub. What's in the guitar case?

It's an Eastman E20SS.

I love it.

I'm not good with it yet, but I'm learning.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

[NachoNeal]

Originally Posted by Wannabecop

Rolex’s finest timepiece

It could be argued, for sure.

[Bluside]

Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott

It's an Eastman E20SS.

I love it.

I'm not good with it yet, but I'm learning.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

That's a nice guitar.

Now back to watches....

[samsmart]

.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk