ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

ferrissteve11 · 11 July 2020, 02:12 AM

Tudor operates in its own space as does Rolex. There's certainly cross over, but I think anyone buying a Tudor thinking its 'better' than a Rolex will ulitmitley not be able to convince themselves of that. I guess a similar comparision might be between Snap On and Blue Point tools. Both good, but one outdoes the other. Be it in the marketing OR simply the refinement of some of the details.
FWIW I've owned a Tudor in the past....great watch. Only reason I moved it along is I disliked not having a date feature. That aside if it had a date complication I would have kept it, regardless that it didn't have the Crown on the dial.

11 July 2020, 02:12 AM	#40
ferrissteve11 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: USA Posts: 1,116	Tudor operates in its own space as does Rolex. There's certainly cross over, but I think anyone buying a Tudor thinking its 'better' than a Rolex will ulitmitley not be able to convince themselves of that. I guess a similar comparision might be between Snap On and Blue Point tools. Both good, but one outdoes the other. Be it in the marketing OR simply the refinement of some of the details. FWIW I've owned a Tudor in the past....great watch. Only reason I moved it along is I disliked not having a date feature. That aside if it had a date complication I would have kept it, regardless that it didn't have the Crown on the dial.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)