ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
20 July 2020, 02:41 PM | #61 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Jesus
Location: Texas
Watch: 116234
Posts: 8,721
|
|
20 July 2020, 03:05 PM | #62 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Jesus
Location: Texas
Watch: 116234
Posts: 8,721
|
https://youtu.be/URUxbeB7_eg
Looks like this guy has similar wrist size to mine! As I mentioned above, I’ve talked to the AD and he’s gonna let me know when he gets one. I’ll keep y’all updated Thanks ! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
20 July 2020, 03:55 PM | #63 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
|
Quote:
Do you still have it or did you sell it? How do you think the bluesy wears on your wrist? When I was picking up my HULK they had a bluesy in the case. I always liked them but I’m not a huge two tone sports Rolex fan even though they do it the best in the business. Maybe id get a CHNR if I could ever try one on in person. I save the flash for my dressier watches. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
21 July 2020, 02:03 AM | #64 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Jesus
Location: Texas
Watch: 116234
Posts: 8,721
|
Quote:
I sold it. Allow me to explain. The bluesy was my first Rolex. When browsing the website, I just picked what to me was the most beautiful watch, and bought it. I didn’t take versatility, flashiness or any of that into consideration, and I wanted a watch that I could wear daily. After a few months of wearing it, I started to realize that the watch was a little too flashy for everyday wear, given my personal style, so I sold it. The watch wore well, although I was kind of obsessed with the glide lock feature and would mess with it almost every day. However, having a super jubilee bracelet now, I feel like the jubilee is a lot more comfortable than the oyster, although I do admit, I miss the extra security of the “flip lock” on the oyster bracelet for the submariner Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
21 July 2020, 08:19 AM | #65 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Larry
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 25,627
|
Explorer II is a beautiful watch no matter what size it is.
__________________
✦ 28238 President DD 18K/YG ✦ 16610LN SS Sub ✦ 16613 18K/SS Serti ✦ 16550 Exp II Non-Rail Cream Dial ✦ Daytona C 116500 ✦ 126710 BLRO GMT-Master II ✦ NEXT-->? ⛳ Hole In One! 10/3/19 DMCC 5th hole, par 3, 168 yards w/ 4-Iron. |
21 July 2020, 01:17 PM | #66 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: USA
Watch: Collector
Posts: 1,482
|
|
21 July 2020, 03:10 PM | #67 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
|
Quote:
Oddly enough I think my DJ is more flashy and slightly less versatile on jubilee. But the bluesy is flashy in its own way. In the end buy what you like. I think a GMT on jubilee might be your perfect watch or a sub to match with your DJ36. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
21 July 2020, 06:52 PM | #68 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Real Name: Daryl
Location: Singapore
Posts: 941
|
I'd say that the 16570 is a better option for your wrist size from my experience of owning one!
|
21 July 2020, 09:44 PM | #69 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Real Name: Rick Dancey
Location: NZ
Posts: 73
|
They’re so cool.
|
21 July 2020, 09:54 PM | #70 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mitch
Location: UAE
Watch: Big Ben
Posts: 2,451
|
Quote:
E2 wears bigger than the Sub. It wears big, like a Panerai. If I were you Id stay with 36-40mm range. I sold the E2 'cos it always felt too big for me, although I liked it a lot. My wrist size is pretty much same as yours.
__________________
IG: @watch_idiot_savant |
|
21 July 2020, 10:10 PM | #71 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Beder
Posts: 92
|
On a 6.8 inch wrist. I found it absolutely acceptable size wise
|
22 July 2020, 12:26 AM | #72 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: US
Posts: 3,386
|
6.7 wrist
|
22 July 2020, 12:42 AM | #73 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Jesus
Location: Texas
Watch: 116234
Posts: 8,721
|
|
22 July 2020, 12:44 AM | #74 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Jesus
Location: Texas
Watch: 116234
Posts: 8,721
|
Quote:
I’m on the waiting list for a SS GMT, but seeing the Explorer 2 on someone’s wrist... It made me realize how nice of a watch it is with the fully brushed bracelet, and brushed non-rotating bezel Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
22 July 2020, 12:47 AM | #75 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Jesus
Location: Texas
Watch: 116234
Posts: 8,721
|
|
22 July 2020, 12:47 AM | #76 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Jesus
Location: Texas
Watch: 116234
Posts: 8,721
|
|
22 July 2020, 01:09 AM | #77 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Louis Nick Ric
Location: Michigan, USA
Watch: Blnr, Expll, Subs,
Posts: 10,171
|
With its low profile case, slender lugs and smaller twinlock crown I think you'd like it. I find it more comfy than my Sub as well. Truly a one of a kind piece
Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk |
22 July 2020, 01:21 AM | #78 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex & Patek
Posts: 1,436
|
I'm about the same wrist size 6.7ish and it's the largest watch I own. I think it looks good. I've been tempted to sell it for the later 5-digit white dial for a change.
The close up photos always make them look a little magnified vs seeing the watch on in person. When it arrives with your AD only you can be the judge |
22 July 2020, 05:48 AM | #79 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: UK
Watch: Sub 16610LN
Posts: 336
|
I agree with this...I have 7.25 wrist and definitely wouldn’t want to go any bigger. It wears large especially the Polar...but it is a truly proper Rolex tool watch. Tough as hell and GMT Function to boot.
__________________
16610LN | 126710 BLRO | 228235 RG Olive | 126300 Slate | 326934 Blue | G Shock GA2100 | 116500LN White |
22 July 2020, 07:16 AM | #80 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Real Name: Kristopher
Location: Phoenix
Watch: Rolex 114060
Posts: 24
|
Explorer II is an amazing watch. I think your wrist is large enough to pull it off. It just comes down to personal preference.
But if it were me, I would go with the 16570. My wrist is a shade over 7 inches and if the 216570 were any larger it would be too big for my taste. |
22 July 2020, 09:23 AM | #81 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Australia
Posts: 137
|
The Polar looks best in 40mm. The 42mm Polar looks too big.
The 42mm looks better in black. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.