ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
14 March 2017, 04:33 PM | #61 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: U.S.
Posts: 2,702
|
Quote:
|
|
14 March 2017, 04:49 PM | #62 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Home!
Posts: 3,307
|
ceramic for me
|
16 March 2017, 12:33 AM | #63 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 246
|
|
16 March 2017, 12:48 AM | #64 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Real Name: David
Location: Suisse
Watch: 16610 LV random
Posts: 6
|
I am 42 years old ,had 6 digits subs (116619,114060,116610 ln and lv )but went back to five digits subs and sd ,only keep a 116600 . Like old style case much more.
|
16 March 2017, 01:00 AM | #65 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
|
It has occured to me that Rolex was trying to take off the Genta inspired Royal Oak/Nautilus abrupt Shape/discontinuity. I don't like the look, believe the 5 digits were close to perfection and think Rolex should have brought another watch out entirely instead of imparting this to the icons. Or produce both case shapes like they did with the OysterQuartz. Wonder how many would buy the maxi one then?
All this being said I can fully understand how some might love the look. The 6 digit crowd needs to understand that when you radically alter an icon a great many will not agree or see it as an improvement over what was a huge part of the previous iconic design. Even if the bracelet is heavier/clasp better.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4 |
16 March 2017, 01:05 AM | #66 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Argentina
Posts: 804
|
|
25 July 2020, 09:59 PM | #67 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: NYC
Posts: 1
|
Bezel width, case, dial diameter
So if both models are same 40mm outer bezel edge to outer bezel edge but bezel is wider on the supercase, does that mean that the dial diameter is smaller on 116610?
|
25 July 2020, 10:03 PM | #68 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 6,545
|
Each has its own charm!
__________________
Wear the watch you like, not the one they tell you to wear! |
25 July 2020, 10:51 PM | #69 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chuck
Location: SW Florida
Watch: 16233,16610,214270
Posts: 11,196
|
The six digit Sub looks too square to me. I do love the new glidelock bracelet, maxi dial & ceramic insert but these things could have bene without changing the size of the case.
__________________
16233 Y Serial Datejust 16610 Z Serial Submariner 214270 Explorer 114300 Oyster Perpetual 76200 Tudor Date+Day |
25 July 2020, 11:30 PM | #70 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: John
Location: Texas
Watch: 14060
Posts: 3,434
|
Retro design and comfort.
|
25 July 2020, 11:58 PM | #71 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: US
Posts: 2,698
|
5-digit contour with the 6-digit ceramic and bracelet will be perfect. The 5 digit clasp looks flimsy and cheap
|
26 July 2020, 12:49 AM | #72 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
|
Watch proportions and comfort. I'm obviously talking about 16610
|
30 July 2020, 08:57 AM | #73 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Real Name: Hans Wildorf
Location: USA
Posts: 159
|
I am going to go 5 digits all the way. Planning to collect all of them.
__________________
♛ Rolex Daytona 16520 Black dial ♛ Rolex Explorer 14270 Swiss only |
30 July 2020, 09:09 AM | #74 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 6,545
|
For the LN I personally prefer the ceramic 116610, but for the LV, I believe both the 5 and 6 digit can coexist in the same collection!
__________________
Wear the watch you like, not the one they tell you to wear! |
30 July 2020, 09:12 AM | #75 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: East
Watch: AP+FPJ+ PP+Rolex
Posts: 1,776
|
Yummy! I know im not the only one who like's 'em fat!!
__________________
|
30 July 2020, 09:30 AM | #76 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Florida Keys
Posts: 149
|
I have both. The five digit is definitely more dainty and dated in appearance.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.