ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
22 August 2020, 03:10 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Ohio, u.s.a
Posts: 5
|
16700 vs 16710 which is more collectable?
Hello everyone,
I am new in the forum, and was wondering if which one is more collectable? Your reply would be appreciated. |
22 August 2020, 07:34 AM | #2 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,515
|
All Rolex watches are collectible.
The GMT Master and the GMT Master II are different generation watches and each has it's followers.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
22 August 2020, 08:32 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: U.S
Watch: Rolex, PP, AP, GS
Posts: 5,785
|
|
22 August 2020, 08:55 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Tim
Location: Worcestershire,UK
Watch: Coke 16710
Posts: 894
|
no bad choices here but there is better functionality in the movement of the 16710
__________________
Tim. 124060 Submariner, 16710 Coke, 16570 Black dial, Datejust 41 Wimbledon dial, Tudor Black Bay GMT, Tudor Black Bay 58 Blue, Tudor Black Bay 58 925, Tudor Prince Date Chronograph (panda dial) |
22 August 2020, 08:59 AM | #5 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,697
|
I'd say in general the 16710 is more desirable. This is due to the three time zone capability. I liked the 16700 due to the fast date set capability.
|
22 August 2020, 09:35 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Odorious Onion
Watch: yes, it's hipster
Posts: 1,587
|
16700 has a (slightly) slimmer profile and the quickset function. It is also less common than the 16710. The 16710, of course, has that extra time zone functionality. Both are fine GMTs, and both are not as collectible as their predecessors, the 16750 and 16760, respectively.
__________________
Here come dat boi Jerry |
22 August 2020, 09:50 AM | #7 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 25,182
|
Quote:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001 Zenith 02.480.405 2FA security enabled |
|
22 August 2020, 09:58 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Louis Nick Ric
Location: Michigan, USA
Watch: Blnr, Expll, Subs,
Posts: 10,172
|
Buy condition, originality. Mines a 16710
Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk |
22 August 2020, 10:01 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: SF
Posts: 589
|
|
22 August 2020, 10:19 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Uk
Watch: RolexGMT/Tudor7928
Posts: 4,182
|
I would pick the 16710 obviously I’m a little biased as I love mine,The watch that’s a keeper |
22 August 2020, 11:29 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Real Name: Jack
Location: NYC
Watch: 16570, 16710
Posts: 1,535
|
they are both sought after and have their own merits as the others have listed. Its more what you want in the watch that matters.
|
23 August 2020, 02:52 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: US, SG, DK, GR
Watch: Reverso
Posts: 3,089
|
Both are awesome and sought after. Although my impression is that most people are more into the 16710, but I think that's because the 16700 is not so well known.
|
23 August 2020, 03:32 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Ohio, u.s.a
Posts: 5
|
Thanks everyone for the input.
|
23 August 2020, 03:43 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 6,545
|
16710 Is the way to go
To me I would certainly go with the 16710!
__________________
Wear the watch you like, not the one they tell you to wear! |
23 August 2020, 11:00 PM | #15 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Real Name: Nash
Location: Europe
Watch: Rolex Only
Posts: 1,579
|
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro Last edited by nachopc; 23 August 2020 at 11:05 PM.. Reason: Mistake |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.