The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 30 November 2020, 06:44 AM   #1
Tan_
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: UK
Posts: 31
Icon7 First or last year of production?

Hi,

I was curious to know peoples opinion on this;

When looking to own a retired/extinct model/reference, do you consider the first year of production or final year to be more significant (or special)?

First year: This is how it was first created and released, the original of the reference.
Last year: final period it was made, possibly with refinements and variations.

I’m not so much concerned with price for either end, just what you consider to be the sweet spot for an extinct model and why?

I understand that condition, documentation and price are often paramount - please let me know what you think from an all-other-things-being-equal viewpoint.

Thanks
Tan_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 November 2020, 06:55 AM   #2
skyblue12
"TRF" Member
 
skyblue12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Uk
Posts: 207
I'd rather have the first example rather than the last.

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
skyblue12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 November 2020, 06:56 AM   #3
brucethemanlee
"TRF" Member
 
brucethemanlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: 1 of 13 Colonies
Posts: 8,575
i'm not that into vintage watch collecting - so others with more experience will no doubt chip in.

But imho....

all things begins equal in terms of price, condition, set.... one would prefer first year production first then last year production and then everything in between

However price will fluctuate widely depending on condition and would take a better condition watch over 1st year watch
brucethemanlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 November 2020, 07:11 AM   #4
Tan_
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: UK
Posts: 31
Thanks both.
That was what I’d thought broadly speaking - Quality of piece, then first year if possible.
Tan_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 November 2020, 07:21 AM   #5
Chadridv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Chadridv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
No expert here but I think it depends on the reference and in most cases makes no difference at all.

I think for example a 16610LV, my guess is the first year is probably more special and dare I say collectible. But take the 116610LV, I don’t think it really matters. Although for some reason I’d prefer to own a 2020.
Chadridv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 November 2020, 07:55 AM   #6
rmagoo57
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
rmagoo57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Ron
Location: Detroitish
Watch: GMT II/Sub/Exp II
Posts: 2,559
Last year for me. I'm noodling putting together a collection of "last run" 5 digit references (or close to last.) I have a couple so why not add a couple more! I also have a 2019 114060 - by luck a last run model. Would love to add a random serial 14060M!
rmagoo57 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 30 November 2020, 07:58 AM   #7
dpt.calvin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: TRF
Posts: 2,270
First for me.
dpt.calvin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 November 2020, 09:37 AM   #8
sutats
"TRF" Member
 
sutats's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: London
Posts: 1,225
Icon7

Hi. To collect, the first version. To wear, the final version. Generally with any type of collectable, it's the first and therefore the oldest variant of anything that people usually remark on and seek.
__________________
There's no such thing as a Submariner No Date, it's simply Submariner.
You don't call a Porsche 911 Turbo, a Porsche 911 Turbo No S.
www.instagram.com/sutatshorology
Post Your Rolex/Tudor Watch Weight (PYRTWW)
sutats is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 November 2020, 09:57 AM   #9
Watchsama
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Tellus
Posts: 194
Hm. If I had to pick. First year. Feels more special. Like the first pressing of a book
Watchsama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 November 2020, 09:59 AM   #10
rmagoo57
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
rmagoo57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Ron
Location: Detroitish
Watch: GMT II/Sub/Exp II
Posts: 2,559
Quote:
Originally Posted by sutats View Post
Hi. To collect, the first version. To wear, the final version. Generally with any type of collectable, it's the first and therefore the oldest variant of anything that people usually remark on and seek.
I collect to wear! I'll stick to last run with all updates incorporated.
rmagoo57 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 30 November 2020, 10:00 AM   #11
MTdweller
"TRF" Member
 
MTdweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Real Name: Ty
Location: West Coast
Watch: the time fly!
Posts: 1,493
I usually prefer the last year of production to get any/all improvements to that model.
MTdweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 November 2020, 11:34 AM   #12
illiguy
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
illiguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: UTC/GMT -5
Posts: 3,662
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTdweller View Post
I usually prefer the last year of production to get any/all improvements to that model.
Same for me.
illiguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 November 2020, 11:46 AM   #13
samuel019
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
samuel019's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Anthony
Location: Triad
Watch: Me go broke!!!!
Posts: 4,038
First for me

My SDK-First year released

My 116613-First year with Smurf dial

Not the greatest examples but what I have that’s no more
__________________
Rolex Collection: A few here and there. Just ask
samuel019 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 November 2020, 11:53 AM   #14
jimcarver
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Abroad
Posts: 829
Depends what you are talking about. Vintage piece, maybe first. 116610Lv or something similar. Last, so many produced that neither years have much significance. So I'd just like the newest one possible.
jimcarver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 November 2020, 02:38 PM   #15
Kevin of Larchmont
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kevin of Larchmont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The Ice House
Watch: Ingersoll Mickey
Posts: 3,393
I’ll buy from the middle of the production run because none of you guys are shopping there. The argument between first or last means nothing to me, it’s still a Rolex and I buy ‘em to wear ‘em. I don’t buy anything too precious to wear and I don’t pay extra for a narrative.
Kevin of Larchmont is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 November 2020, 02:42 PM   #16
kans86
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Berlin
Posts: 1,340
Quote:
Originally Posted by sutats View Post
Hi. To collect, the first version. To wear, the final version. Generally with any type of collectable, it's the first and therefore the oldest variant of anything that people usually remark on and seek.
Agreed with this.
kans86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 November 2020, 02:46 PM   #17
Dr.Smellody
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 5,414
I like to have both.... the closest I have is a SUBMARINER 6205 and a last year SUBMARINER 16610.
Dr.Smellody is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
opinions , survey


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.