ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
12 April 2021, 05:54 AM | #61 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Jason
Location: UK
Posts: 695
|
Classic in the making. Congratulations op
|
12 April 2021, 10:46 AM | #62 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Chicago
Watch: Nerd
Posts: 807
|
|
13 April 2021, 02:40 AM | #63 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Chicago
Watch: Nerd
Posts: 807
|
Couple additional pictures from this morning.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
13 April 2021, 05:07 AM | #64 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: Doug
Location: Charlotte, NC
Watch: Daytona BLNR SubLV
Posts: 2,266
|
Quote:
Both leather and NATO have tang buckles in silver to match case — so, no deployment. I will get mine mid-May according to my AD. I never really considered a Tudor until this one. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
14 April 2021, 06:48 AM | #65 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: california
Posts: 18
|
Great pics, I never thought I would want a bb58 so bad.
Is the extra thickness in the 925 in the slab side of the case or the caseback itself? |
15 April 2021, 11:35 PM | #66 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Chicago
Watch: Nerd
Posts: 807
|
I don’t really notice a considerable difference in thickness versus the stainless when comparing live. Maybe a little bit.
|
15 April 2021, 11:48 PM | #67 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: Doug
Location: Charlotte, NC
Watch: Daytona BLNR SubLV
Posts: 2,266
|
Quote:
It’s interesting how much thicker it appears vs. blue BB58 in your pics. Now that you’ve worn it for a few days, how do you like it and how does it compare to your blue BB58? I ask because I’ve always been a bracelet guy but am on the list for the 925. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.