The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11 April 2021, 04:34 AM   #61
GGGMT
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GGGMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 8,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by GGGMT View Post
Made this switch in 2015 because the 36mm is too small.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Whoops meaning to the 214270, the best sized exi


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
GGGMT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2021, 04:56 AM   #62
Gimoozaabi
"TRF" Member
 
Gimoozaabi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LBSF
Watch: ing the grass grow
Posts: 699
I am keeping both 214270 Mk II and 14270. The five digits Explorer is made in 1991, lug holes case, tritium dial and gorgeous light 'frozen' patina on the dial.

I really like that Rolex introduced the Explorer in its original old school size, I believe in few years it will be available in 41mm as well.
Gimoozaabi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2021, 11:57 AM   #63
baamvino
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: US
Posts: 319
Here are some side by side photos.
They are 2 different watches.
I think the old 36mm is more refined and balanced overall
Attached Images
   
baamvino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2021, 12:39 PM   #64
Sunny Arizona
"TRF" Member
 
Sunny Arizona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Brad
Location: Colorado
Watch: 16613
Posts: 1,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by iTreelex View Post
I hope everyone knows that the 114270/14270 isn't really 36mm. It's about 35mm and wears a lot like a 34mm. That thing is tiny. I think Rolex got the Exp I right this time with a true 36mm.
36 on the button. All dial.
Sunny Arizona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2021, 12:49 PM   #65
2nastie
"TRF" Member
 
2nastie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: YVR
Watch: Time Only
Posts: 2,332
Quote:
Originally Posted by baamvino View Post
Here are some side by side photos.
They are 2 different watches.
I think the old 36mm is more refined and balanced overall
Looks like the new one would resemble a “maxi” type dial. Overall interested to see what it looks like in person.
2nastie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2021, 06:30 AM   #66
McDusty
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: New York
Posts: 88
Just learned of this new 36mm Explorer today. Looks very nice.

First thought though .. "now we know why they killed off the 36mm 3-6-9 OP six months ago".
McDusty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2021, 01:36 AM   #67
CagKaly
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Turkey
Posts: 56
From Hodinkee Japan
Attached Images
 
CagKaly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2021, 01:57 AM   #68
nickscaps
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Real Name: Nick
Location: USA
Watch: DJ126200 Blue
Posts: 71
I've been following a few threads suggesting that the new 36mm may actually have 19mm lugs and slimmer outer lugs than a similar OP/DJ. It seems to make sense.
nickscaps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2021, 06:13 PM   #69
CagKaly
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Turkey
Posts: 56
From Hypebeast
Attached Images
   
CagKaly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2021, 06:24 PM   #70
Lew Archer
"TRF" Member
 
Lew Archer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: L.A., Calif.
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 2,220
That's right. The new one is pure garbage. Stick with the 39mm, or an old 36mm. So much better. Definitely don't buy one! Spread the word! Don't buy the new Explorer!

That way, I may be able to get my hands on one before I'm too old to tell time...maybe at a discount!
Lew Archer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2021, 08:02 PM   #71
jipstone
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2021
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lew Archer View Post
That's right. The new one is pure garbage. Stick with the 39mm, or an old 36mm. So much better. Definitely don't buy one! Spread the word! Don't buy the new Explorer!

That way, I may be able to get my hands on one before I'm too old to tell time...maybe at a discount!

I for one will be happy to spread the word! Just sold my (beloved) 14270 to make room for the new one. The new garbage ticks all the boxes which weren’t ticked before, lumed numbers, better bracelet, AR coating…
Don’t buy it!


Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk
jipstone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2021, 05:42 AM   #72
canneverdecide
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 4
I thought I was sold when I heard the 124270 was in 36mm with lumed 3,6,9

Doubt crept in when I saw the beefy indices and lugs, and the 19mm bracelet size

the 114270 proportions just seemed so perfect to me, understated and classic. the new one is a bit 'louder' and dial features feel 'scrunched'.

Anyone else agree? I hope I'm wrong cause I'd love to buy a new Rolex!
canneverdecide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2021, 06:28 AM   #73
rossi46
2024 Pledge Member
 
rossi46's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Dan
Location: CT, by a lake
Watch: 16570
Posts: 1,544
Quote:
Originally Posted by canneverdecide View Post
the 114270 proportions just seemed so perfect to me, understated and classic. the new one is a bit 'louder' and dial features feel 'scrunched'.

Anyone else agree? I hope I'm wrong cause I'd love to buy a new Rolex!
As someone else noted, this does seem like a "maxi-dial" version of the Exp. Certainly the hour markers are more bold (even a little brash?) compared to older 36 versions.

So on one hand, Rolex downsized the lug width and made the bracelet taper narrower. Yet, on the other, they made the dial a little louder. I find it a strange decision, but that's kinda the Rolex MO these days.

It will have to be an on-the-wrist decision. Which, considering how impossible any SS Rolex is to find these days, may be impossible.
__________________
A watch is about the entire package, not just its appearance. Any large watch company not making its own movement is not making a watch at all; they’re just playing dress-up. --The Watch Snob
rossi46 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2021, 06:12 AM   #74
boxsash
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: England
Watch: 1680
Posts: 41
I think you nailed it with 'It will have to be an on-the-wrist decision.'

I have a 114270 and am on the list for a new model. I'm looking forward to the new movement, a great new bracelet, great new lume colour and a glowing 3,6 and 9. The dial Indices being larger I feel may be only really obvious it direct comparison or close up. I think that on the wrist it will look balanced and right to itself....if I get one I'll let you know :)
__________________
1680, 16600, 114270.
boxsash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2021, 06:12 AM   #75
boxsash
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: England
Watch: 1680
Posts: 41
I think you nailed it with 'It will have to be an on-the-wrist decision.'

I have a 114270 and am on the list for a new model. I'm looking forward to the new movement, a great new bracelet, great new lume colour and a glowing 3,6 and 9. The dial Indices being larger I feel may be only really obvious it direct comparison or close up. I think that on the wrist it will look balanced and right to itself....if I get one I'll let you know :)
__________________
1680, 16600, 114270.
boxsash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2021, 07:10 AM   #76
fania123
"TRF" Member
 
fania123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PHILA
Posts: 1,725
14270 for me.
Attached Images
   
fania123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2021, 07:36 AM   #77
dannyp
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
Quote:
Originally Posted by fania123 View Post
14270 for me.
Nice example! Never realized how "late" the Explorer was to the flip-lock party.
dannyp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2021, 07:59 AM   #78
fania123
"TRF" Member
 
fania123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PHILA
Posts: 1,725
Quote:
Originally Posted by dannyp View Post
Nice example! Never realized how "late" the Explorer was to the flip-lock party.
Thanks, just came back from RSC.
fania123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.