ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
4 September 2005, 10:08 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,872
|
I don't like it neither but 1 watch is not representative for the whole brand.
I'm sure that every sigle brand once made watches that look stupid today. JLC for example is a superb manufacturer but if you take a look at some pieces they made in the 70's or 80's ... they're butt-ugly. Besides most gold watches with diamond and other precious stones are ugly pimp watches. Or do you like the Leopard Daytona ??? I can't imagine that you 'hate' this watch. for me, the Royal Oak is the best looking chronograph available. Looks 10 times better than a Daytona. I like my daytona but an RO chronograph from AP just looks better. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.