ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

SignotheTimes · 27 November 2021, 04:14 AM

Hello everyone,
is this dial periodically correct for a serial number 2.1 Mil. and which MK ... is it?

Thanks and greetings

mignonp13 · 27 November 2021, 04:22 AM

Hi, no you need a Long E dial, this one one is mk5 for last production, surely swapped during a service with hands and insert

Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk

Initial_J · 27 November 2021, 05:36 AM

+1 on mignonp13's comments.

The Long E dial is appropriate for that vintage / serials in the 2m range.

This looks like a Mk 5B. According to my research this is not the most common service dial, but sometimes used a service dial nonetheless. The hands match the dial indicating they were likely replaced together.

The bezel insert has also been replaced. See the top half of the 8's. All 1675's should have an oval for the top half of the 8. These are round.

springer · 27 November 2021, 07:18 AM

The dial in your watch is not correct based on the serial number.

You need a Mark I dial - which some guys call a LONG E.

Your current dial is one of the Mark V variations which were sometimes used as a service dial decades ago.

SignotheTimes · 3 December 2021, 04:54 PM

Would this dial be periodically correct?

Dan S · 3 December 2021, 07:31 PM

You can find this information here: https://gmtmaster1675.com

springer · 4 December 2021, 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SignotheTimes

Would this dial be periodically correct?

That would be a Mark I dial which would be correct.

Try this thread at the gmtforum.com The last entry is the Mark I dial.

https://www.gmtforum.com/viewforum.p...d076529e2115a5

27 November 2021, 04:14 AM	#1
SignotheTimes "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2021 Location: Germany Posts: 66	Rolex 1675 1968/69 Dial Hello everyone, is this dial periodically correct for a serial number 2.1 Mil. and which MK ... is it? Thanks and greetings Attached Images

27 November 2021, 05:36 AM	#3
Initial_J "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2018 Location: San Francisco, CA Posts: 73	+1 on mignonp13's comments. The Long E dial is appropriate for that vintage / serials in the 2m range. This looks like a Mk 5B. According to my research this is not the most common service dial, but sometimes used a service dial nonetheless. The hands match the dial indicating they were likely replaced together. The bezel insert has also been replaced. See the top half of the 8's. All 1675's should have an oval for the top half of the 8. These are round. __________________ Rolex GMT Master 1675 “Pepsi” \| Rolex GMT Master II 116710BLNR “Batman” \| Rolex Daytona 116520 (black dial) \| Vacheron Constantin Overseas Chronograph LE 49150-000A-9017 \| Cartier Santos de Cartier Large Black ADLC WSSA0039 \| Panerai PAM00673

27 November 2021, 07:18 AM	#4
springer 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: jP Location: Texas Watch: GMT-MASTER Posts: 17,319	The dial in your watch is not correct based on the serial number. You need a Mark I dial - which some guys call a LONG E. Your current dial is one of the Mark V variations which were sometimes used as a service dial decades ago. __________________ Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.

3 December 2021, 04:54 PM	#5
SignotheTimes "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2021 Location: Germany Posts: 66	Would this dial be periodically correct? Attached Images

3 December 2021, 07:31 PM	#6
Dan S 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2018 Location: Colorado, USA Posts: 6,289	You can find this information here: https://gmtmaster1675.com __________________ @oldwatchdan on IG

27 November 2021, 04:22 AM	#2
mignonp13 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: France Posts: 58	Hi, no you need a Long E dial, this one one is mk5 for last production, surely swapped during a service with hands and insert Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)