ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

amh · 28 May 2022, 10:26 PM

No. Like most things Tudor is doing to make things 'better', it actually makes things worse. All the damn 'heritage' features packed into a single piece with lipstick on top.

But on the other hand it's certainly excellent value if you happen to like it.

HogwldFLTR · 28 May 2022, 10:34 PM

It's not bad looking; questionable construction of the bracelet make it a no go for me.

holdingon · 28 May 2022, 11:42 PM

Not a fan of wrapped gold. I would stick with steel watches.

28 May 2022, 10:34 PM	#152
HogwldFLTR 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Real Name: Lee Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48 Watch: Too many to list! Posts: 33,692	It's not bad looking; questionable construction of the bracelet make it a no go for me. __________________ Troglodyte in residence! https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599

28 May 2022, 10:26 PM	#151
amh "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Tejas Watch: Various Posts: 5,082	No. Like most things Tudor is doing to make things 'better', it actually makes things worse. All the damn 'heritage' features packed into a single piece with lipstick on top. But on the other hand it's certainly excellent value if you happen to like it.

28 May 2022, 11:42 PM	#153
holdingon "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2020 Location: usa Posts: 553	Not a fan of wrapped gold. I would stick with steel watches.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)