The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17 June 2009, 03:19 AM   #1
diablojota
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Real Name: Frank
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Watch: SS Submariner Date
Posts: 4,042
Rolex Buys Rolex Watches To Prevent Price Drops

Over at Luxist (http://www.luxist.com/2009/06/16/rol...price-drops/):
by Ariel Adams Jun 16th 2009 at 7:01AM

Watch sales are down, way down in some places, and the only option for many dealers is to provide deep discounts to move inventory. This creates price drops that many watch brands are less than thrilled with. Some brands are taking an active approach to protect brand pricing. Rolex is personally purchasing back inventory from dealers who are having trouble selling Rolex watches. Buying back the watches gives some money back to the retailers to help them during hard times, and allows Rolex to be confident that less deep discounting is occurring in the market. Rolex is of the most protective brands when it comes to pricing and image. They have an almost legendary reputation for not giving significant discounts. This is not a fact that they wish to change right now when keeping the integrity of a brand's pricing system solid is an important endeavor.

It is no secret that Rolex is a cash rich company. It is not likely a huge impact for them to be buying back inventory which will likely be warehoused until future times when things are better for the luxury watch market. I would go so far as to say that it is probably in Rolex's best interest to dismantle and recycle unsold watches than to release them at below market rates (that they set). Further, you might be wondering why dealers are all selling back to Rolex in the first place rather than discounting and potentially getting more money. This would likely conflict with their authorized dealer contracts with Rolex. Plus, Rolex likely has a redemption right - that allows it to buy back stock under certain circumstances. For you, this means less chance that your dream Rolex watch is going to be discounted any time soon. Pictured is a 2009 Rolex Datejust watch with Arabic numerals.
__________________
RTFT - Read The Friggin' Thread

FcB
diablojota is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 03:41 AM   #2
ocwatching
"TRF" Member
 
ocwatching's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Phil
Location: CA
Posts: 5,374
Interesting..thanks for the post...
This move makes sense IMHO..
__________________
too much into watches...
ocwatching is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 03:58 AM   #3
BigHat
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Matt
Location: Arlington, VA
Watch: Lange One MP
Posts: 4,043
Good find Frank.
BigHat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 04:03 AM   #4
Fabuloso
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Miami
Posts: 27
It's all about maintaining high brand equity, that's what Rolex is all about! It also protects the value of our "previously loved" watches in the secondary market.
Fabuloso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 04:13 AM   #5
B Square
"TRF" Member
 
B Square's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Boyd
Location: NC
Posts: 1,815
Would it not make sense for the AD to sell to the consumer at a deeply discounted price rather than to resell back to Rolex at cost?
__________________
16610M
16710Z Pepsi
16570V White
B Square is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 04:19 AM   #6
LocoNBroko
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: California
Watch: GMTIIcSUBUBFDSDDS
Posts: 334
Makes sense to me... But what is going to happen in 3 years when things improve and Z and W series watches start shipping back to the AD's? And are they going to be serviced again before being shipped back out?
Or are they going to take them apart, scrap the cases and use the movements, dials and bracelets in a new series?
LocoNBroko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 04:21 AM   #7
diablojota
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Real Name: Frank
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Watch: SS Submariner Date
Posts: 4,042
Quote:
Originally Posted by LocoNBroko View Post
Makes sense to me... But what is going to happen in 3 years when things improve and Z and W series watches start shipping back to the AD's? And are they going to be serviced again before being shipped back out?
Or are they going to take them apart, scrap the cases and use the movements, dials and bracelets in a new series?
Who knows. My AD has primarily all M-Series watches and the guy was trying to tell me that these were the latest. I nodded my head, bit my tongue, thanked him and left. I hate having only one AD in town.
__________________
RTFT - Read The Friggin' Thread

FcB
diablojota is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 04:35 AM   #8
beshannon
"TRF" Member
 
beshannon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
Interesting.

No actual source for the article, just speculation. I too would wonder about watches that might be out of warranty.

If this is true I have to say that I am somewhat taken aback at their business model and I am not sure about how I feel when it may come to purchasing another Rolex piece.

I understand defending the brand but intentionally manipulating prices like this smacks a bit unethical. Why don't they just reduce production? If they are so cash rich, that saves them money too instead of continuing to flood the market with product only to "possibly" buy it back. Reducing supply is certainly more palatable than removing comleted product from stores.
__________________
IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock
beshannon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 04:58 AM   #9
diablojota
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Real Name: Frank
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Watch: SS Submariner Date
Posts: 4,042
I don't read french, but this is the originating site, and they have links to other information on it as well. This had to come from somewhere (http://www.worldtempus.com/fr/actual...opres-montres/)

I don't like the idea either. I think Rolex priced themselves too high at this point and it's starting to catch up with them, especially in the economy as it currently stands.
__________________
RTFT - Read The Friggin' Thread

FcB
diablojota is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 05:07 AM   #10
Rolexroz
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Roz
Location: Scotland
Watch: Orange hand Exp11
Posts: 103
What's new

Omega have been doing this for many a year, worse than that they have been buying most of ther own stock when sold at auction (allegedly). One only has to look at the OMEGAMANIA auction site to realise that they are trying to boost the value of their own stock. But this is not a new phenomenon as they have been doing the same with SWATCH watches for quite a few years.

One only has to read the financial papers to realise that they are trying to raise the value of OMEGA by relating the watches to various celebrities.

A good watch is one that we, the people want for it's own value, not the supposed value as described by a celebrity/company owner etc.

I hope I have use enough, allegedly, supposedly, I heard that.... etc etc etc too keep me out of court..........but do your own research, it is the truth(allegedly).

Rolexroz
Rolexroz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 05:10 AM   #11
Gold Crown
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Ross
Location: Chicago Area
Watch: 6265 18K Daytona
Posts: 928
Quote:
Originally Posted by diablojota View Post
I don't read french, but this is the originating site, and they have links to other information on it as well. This had to come from somewhere (http://www.worldtempus.com/fr/actual...opres-montres/)

I don't like the idea either. I think Rolex priced themselves too high at this point and it's starting to catch up with them, especially in the economy as it currently stands.
Agreed. They got a little to greedy in the past 10 years.
Gold Crown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 05:12 AM   #12
buz-lh
"TRF" Member
 
buz-lh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Buz
Location: Atlanta
Watch: Rolex Tudor Pam
Posts: 5,108
Interesting read and certainly feasable. IF Rolex monitors sales prices in AD's and has a stipulation in the AD's contract that gives them this right to repurchase I don't see why they wouldn't excercise it in this market to "protect" the brand. I've got all the new models I want right now so I sort of hope it's true as this will protect the value of the preowned watches somewhat.
__________________
Buz
The faster you move, the slower time passes, the longer you live. Peter Diamandis

buz-lh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 05:17 AM   #13
kcmo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Karis
Location: USA
Posts: 19,377
Interesting read....thanks for posting this!
kcmo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 05:44 AM   #14
cmr
"TRF" Member
 
cmr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: marcus
Location: us, oklahoma
Posts: 1,646
Quote:
Originally Posted by diablojota View Post
I don't read french, but this is the originating site, and they have links to other information on it as well. This had to come from somewhere (http://www.worldtempus.com/fr/actual...opres-montres/)

I don't like the idea either. I think Rolex priced themselves too high at this point and it's starting to catch up with them, especially in the economy as it currently stands.
without a doubt.
__________________
cmr


OA-Black dial SS Daytona, V-White dial SS Daytona, Z-GMT2C
Wife, Z-Platinum Yacht Master, Black ceramic White dial SS Daytona,
cmr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 06:03 AM   #15
argee1977
"TRF" Member
 
argee1977's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Ryan
Location: England
Watch: AP ROC
Posts: 1,462
Quite a lot of companies do this, and depending on the product a lot of them manipulate the second hand market as well to keep the new price within a set parameter. The way they do this is to use some of the production run for employees and other personnel, then once they've used them for 3 months change over, then they stockpile the 'secondhand' items and put them onto the market depending on how the price is doing, if the price is too low they reduce the stock they put on the market, if it's too high they put more on.

With Rolex though they've gone too high, too quickly, the market allowed the prices to rise to this level due to the economy being on a high, credit being freely available and people moving their collateral around to free up money and buy that watch they always wanted. But now we're in a recession, the people who had equity or freedom to spend thousands aren't doing so, or can't, yet the Rolex prices stay the same. I think it may come to a head in the next couple of years, Rolex can't continue to buy back stock for an extended period of time, and that's going to mean they'll need to change something within their business plan.
__________________

PANERAI, MORE THAN A WATCH, LESS THAN A KITKAT
argee1977 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 06:06 AM   #16
Flaxmoore
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Casey
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Watch: Alpha Milsub
Posts: 704
Not a fan of this idea.

If sales are down, there is a reason. In this case, it's likely a lack of ready cash in the hands of potential buyers, a legacy of a garbage economy. The sensible answer is to bring prices down, not ensure they remain inflated.

Like Subs as I do, I still can't give a logical reason for a new SS Sub to run four to six grand, when the Omega Seamaster equivalent is half that, maybe a little less. When business is good, you can raise prices. Problem is, I think Rolex has priced themselves out of reach.

My first premium watch will be an Omega Speedmaster Pro. $2500 on the secondary market, compared to $10-15,000 for the Rolex Daytona.

Rolex's pricing makes no sense. If they don't watch it, this recession is going to hurt them very badly.
Flaxmoore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 06:08 AM   #17
beshannon
"TRF" Member
 
beshannon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rolexroz View Post
Omega have been doing this for many a year, worse than that they have been buying most of ther own stock when sold at auction (allegedly). One only has to look at the OMEGAMANIA auction site to realise that they are trying to boost the value of their own stock. But this is not a new phenomenon as they have been doing the same with SWATCH watches for quite a few years.


Rolexroz
True enough. Buying at auction is one thing to prop up the price of a singular collectible piece but buying back entire inventories is quite another thing.

Perhaps if they stopped shoving inventory down the throats of retailers they could slow the grey market and actually allow prices to increase naturally. After all they create the grey market with their production goals.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flaxmoore View Post
Not a fan of this idea.

If sales are down, there is a reason. In this case, it's likely a lack of ready cash in the hands of potential buyers, a legacy of a garbage economy. The sensible answer is to bring prices down, not ensure they remain inflated.

Like Subs as I do, I still can't give a logical reason for a new SS Sub to run four to six grand, when the Omega Seamaster equivalent is half that, maybe a little less. When business is good, you can raise prices. Problem is, I think Rolex has priced themselves out of reach.

My first premium watch will be an Omega Speedmaster Pro. $2500 on the secondary market, compared to $10-15,000 for the Rolex Daytona.

Rolex's pricing makes no sense. If they don't watch it, this recession is going to hurt them very badly.
While I am not sure it will hurt Rolex I agree their their pricing makes no sense. Arguing that "someone" is buying them is not really the answer. They are trying very hard to price most interested buyers out of the new market and into the grey market. They still get to sell product but the sheer amount of product will keep prices down on the more plentiful models.
__________________
IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock
beshannon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 06:10 AM   #18
Yume-sama
"TRF" Member
 
Yume-sama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: CAN / SIN
Watch: Plat. Masterpiece
Posts: 1,959
Wouldn't it make more sense to make less?
Yume-sama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 06:13 AM   #19
beshannon
"TRF" Member
 
beshannon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yume-sama View Post
Wouldn't it make more sense to make less?
From an economic and business point of view, yes.
__________________
IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock
beshannon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 06:13 AM   #20
BigHat
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Matt
Location: Arlington, VA
Watch: Lange One MP
Posts: 4,043
[QUOTE=beshannon;1222812]
I understand defending the brand but intentionally manipulating prices like this smacks a bit unethical. Why don't they just reduce production? If they are so cash rich...QUOTE]

I don't have a well-thoughtout opinion on the buyback option as policy. Even if it is happening, to what extent?

I know dealers discount when they find it in their best interests, just like they sell to the grey market. This is just another tool (but welcomed by Rolex) to move stock.

I don't understand the question on why not just limit production. I suspect they are severely limiting production as it is, but how does that address cash flow problems at the AD level? That's like a auto dealership with a lot full of "floored planned" cars hearing the plant is reducing production. Great, but it means nothing to them. Rolexes don't flow through the dealer network like electricity, frictionlessly evening global supply and demand.

I'm also wary of statements like they're a "cash rich" business. Says who? Show me the balance sheet...that isn't disclosed to the public.
BigHat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 06:25 AM   #21
beshannon
"TRF" Member
 
beshannon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigHat View Post
I don't have a well-thoughtout opinion on the buyback option as policy. Even if it is happening, to what extent?
I guess that is my question.

This statement from the article has no independent verification from Rolex, a dealer or other source other than this writer. How does this writer know this?

Quote:
Rolex is personally purchasing back inventory from dealers who are having trouble selling Rolex watches.
I question the statement without some type of confirmation as Rolex is well known to be very secretive.
__________________
IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock
beshannon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 06:44 AM   #22
kayaker21
"TRF" Member
 
kayaker21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Canada
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,798
Not in canada

They are forcing ADS to take larger inventory,and collecting sooner no help for ADS in canada.
kayaker21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 06:50 AM   #23
diablojota
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Real Name: Frank
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Watch: SS Submariner Date
Posts: 4,042
Quote:
Originally Posted by beshannon View Post
I guess that is my question.

This statement from the article has no independent verification from Rolex, a dealer or other source other than this writer. How does this writer know this?

I question the statement without some type of confirmation as Rolex is well known to be very secretive.
If you read french, I posted the link to the originating site that had additional references to information that Rolex is doing this. I don't, however, read French.

I would not be surprised if they did this, as this is not an uncommon practice in general. And you will never get confirmation from any business that they are doing this. I don't care if it's a public company or private. They do not have to disclose this information, all you would see on the balance sheets is some form of payment to suppliers without any specificity attached.
__________________
RTFT - Read The Friggin' Thread

FcB
diablojota is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 06:51 AM   #24
Bebot
"TRF" Member
 
Bebot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Emil
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: U macallit
Posts: 2,645
Sounds good to me. This mean my Rollies are going to hold their values.
Bebot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 06:54 AM   #25
beshannon
"TRF" Member
 
beshannon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bebot View Post
Sounds good to me. This mean my Rollies are going to hold their values.
So long as the prices are artificially propped up
__________________
IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock
beshannon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 06:54 AM   #26
diablojota
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Real Name: Frank
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Watch: SS Submariner Date
Posts: 4,042
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bebot View Post
Sounds good to me. This mean my Rollies are going to hold their values.
I would prefer they do it by limiting production versus buying back what they make.
__________________
RTFT - Read The Friggin' Thread

FcB
diablojota is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 07:01 AM   #27
B. Doggy
"TRF" Member
 
B. Doggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
PP is also known for doing this via auctions, etc....which raises eyebrows for some.
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega
B. Doggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 08:03 AM   #28
Flaxmoore
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Casey
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Watch: Alpha Milsub
Posts: 704
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bebot View Post
Sounds good to me. This mean my Rollies are going to hold their values.
By holding their values, I presume you mean to append "at the expense of potential owners"? I can't figure out how this could be a sustainable model.
Flaxmoore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 08:17 AM   #29
Bebot
"TRF" Member
 
Bebot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Emil
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: U macallit
Posts: 2,645
Quote:
Originally Posted by diablojota View Post
I would prefer they do it by limiting production versus buying back what they make.
That would also make sense, but you can't have a limited production for most or all models.
Bebot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2009, 08:22 AM   #30
Bebot
"TRF" Member
 
Bebot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Emil
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: U macallit
Posts: 2,645
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flaxmoore View Post
By holding their values, I presume you mean to append "at the expense of potential owners"? I can't figure out how this could be a sustainable model.
Well, imagine AD's start discounting all models, I mean really dropped prices down to get rid of them. As an AD, you just can't have hundred thousand of dollars sitting inside the display case. Or for some AD's this are costing them money because not all them can pay cash for their inventory so they do this on a loan interest basis.

This means that if any reasons that you need to sell your Rolex, it will have almost no resale value whatsoever.
Bebot is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.