ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
26 June 2009, 09:59 PM | #31 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Weizhen
Location: Singapore
Watch: Rolex Explorer I
Posts: 162
|
The answer is obvious since this is a Rolex forum
|
26 June 2009, 10:10 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
|
I have not owned a current Breitling, but did have three going back to the late 60's, all three spent more time on the work bench than on my arm. I like the looks of the new Breitlings but I don't think I would buy one over a Rolex of any kind.
|
27 June 2009, 02:19 AM | #33 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Japan
Watch: ing your back.
Posts: 16,179
|
Explorer II. Definitely a no brainer.
|
27 June 2009, 02:48 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Mike
Location: Charlotte NC
Watch: SD & Exp II
Posts: 961
|
Don't even waste time thinking...
__________________
16600 Sea-Dweller 16570 Explorer II (White Dial) |
27 June 2009, 04:44 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Dr Mark R Nail
Location: New Albany
Watch: Tudor Sub 75090
Posts: 8,254
|
Expy II....Love mine...trust you would as well.
__________________
------------------------------- Member of the Nylon Nation |
27 June 2009, 04:59 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: CT, USA
Posts: 141
|
Exp II
|
27 June 2009, 07:30 AM | #37 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 801
|
The Explorer is boring and the Breitling MB is a thing of beauty
|
27 June 2009, 08:03 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Dave
Location: England.
Watch: Various
Posts: 7,305
|
Tough call, both are very different watches.
Don't let the crystal on the Breitling worry you, they are superb, its sometimes impossible to see that there is actually a crystal fitted, in house or ETA movements don't really bother me, most of the time one is looking at the face not the back, Breitling use tried and tested ETA movements that are heavily modified and keep excellent time. Which do I prefer? the Rolex, simply because between the two models compared I like the face of the Explorer better, if the choice was between the Explorer and the Avenger Sea Wolf I would, and have, picked the latter. What I will add is that IMHO whichever of the two that you choose, you will not be disappointed, great problem to have, neither solution will be wrong.
__________________
KINDEST REGARDS DAVE |
27 June 2009, 10:50 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 25
|
Explorer II !!!
|
27 June 2009, 11:06 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Nick
Location: South Carolina
Watch: Rolex GMTIIc
Posts: 11
|
I was confronted with the same sort of situation earlier this year. It was between a Breitling SuperOcean Steelfish (new for $2800) or an ExpII (used for $3600) from the same AD. After days of deliberation I went with the ExpII. Here's the moral to the story. Today I returned the ExpII to the same AD and traded it in for the new GMTIIc. The AD gave me my full purchase price back for the ExpII AND took off $500 from the GMTIIc. Had I purchased the Breitling, I would still have the Breitling. It is a fantastic watch but will never be worth even close to what I paid for it. I'll be posting my review of the new GMTIIc along with photos in a separate thread.
|
27 June 2009, 12:03 PM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Allan
Location: California
Posts: 3,210
|
Anything Rolex!!
Allan |
27 June 2009, 07:02 PM | #42 | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
|
Quote:
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.