ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

HogwldFLTR · 19 October 2022, 07:29 PM

The current Milgauss has been tested to 60,000 gauss so it's quite a bit above its name. The new movement can't perform to the same level by design. There's no data shown anywhere for the 3230, only claims of improvement. It also has the problems that have intermittently bother it (as opposed to the older movement). I can't find any data on the 3230 magnetic resistance. Here's a rough comparison between the MG and Omega.

https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/a-...odymium-magnet

19 October 2022, 07:29 PM	#1
HogwldFLTR 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Real Name: Lee Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48 Watch: Too many to list! Posts: 33,693	The current Milgauss has been tested to 60,000 gauss so it's quite a bit above its name. The new movement can't perform to the same level by design. There's no data shown anywhere for the 3230, only claims of improvement. It also has the problems that have intermittently bother it (as opposed to the older movement). I can't find any data on the 3230 magnetic resistance. Here's a rough comparison between the MG and Omega. https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/a-...odymium-magnet __________________ Troglodyte in residence! https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)