ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Jakord · 18 November 2022, 11:05 PM

Hello! I'm new to this wonderful forum

I'm thinking about buying this Rolex 118239, but I'm no expert like many here. How would you rate the condition of this watch? Anything that stands out or seems weird? Thank you so much for your help.

K serial (mid 2001)
Clasp code: DT6
Bracelet: 83859
It's in Tokyo, Japan

Zaslice · 18 November 2022, 11:31 PM

I don’t think that dial is correct for a 6 digit DD but I could be wrong

TheWatchmen · 19 November 2022, 01:16 AM

Not sure about 100% authenticity, but it looks very clean.

Seddyspaghetti · 19 November 2022, 01:23 AM

Welcome. Condition looks great to me

matthew_r · 19 November 2022, 01:24 AM

I could be wrong, but the bracelet looks like what would have came on a 18239 not a 118239. Since this is an early 118239, it could be correct but it is definitely worth researching.

TheWatchmen · 19 November 2022, 02:47 AM

You also might try posting in the vintage forum, not that a 6-digit reference is necessary “vintage”, but the guys over there have a crazy amount of knowledge and have been in the business of validating authenticity for a long time.

Jakord · 21 November 2022, 09:22 PM

I got a copy of the papers.

Is it weird that there is no date or name on the papers? Also should the serial number be hole-punched and not printed?

billyhsat · 24 December 2022, 07:09 AM

AD in Busan South Korea, but as far as no date or name I can't advise whether that was an aok practice back then or not. Watch looks clean though.

18 November 2022, 11:05 PM	#1
Jakord "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2022 Location: Stockholm Posts: 2	Help me rate this Rolex 118239 Hello! I'm new to this wonderful forum I'm thinking about buying this Rolex 118239, but I'm no expert like many here. How would you rate the condition of this watch? Anything that stands out or seems weird? Thank you so much for your help. K serial (mid 2001) Clasp code: DT6 Bracelet: 83859 It's in Tokyo, Japan Attached Images

21 November 2022, 09:22 PM	#7
Jakord "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2022 Location: Stockholm Posts: 2	I got a copy of the papers. Is it weird that there is no date or name on the papers? Also should the serial number be hole-punched and not printed? Attached Images

18 November 2022, 11:31 PM	#2
Zaslice "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Location: Chamblee GA Posts: 227	I don’t think that dial is correct for a 6 digit DD but I could be wrong

19 November 2022, 01:16 AM	#3
TheWatchmen "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2019 Location: The Moon Posts: 1,367	Not sure about 100% authenticity, but it looks very clean.

19 November 2022, 01:23 AM	#4
Seddyspaghetti "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2016 Location: Uranus Watch: 116500LN Posts: 4,789	Welcome. Condition looks great to me

19 November 2022, 01:24 AM	#5
matthew_r "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2020 Real Name: Matt Location: USA Watch: 114200 Posts: 72	I could be wrong, but the bracelet looks like what would have came on a 18239 not a 118239. Since this is an early 118239, it could be correct but it is definitely worth researching.

19 November 2022, 02:47 AM	#6
TheWatchmen "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2019 Location: The Moon Posts: 1,367	You also might try posting in the vintage forum, not that a 6-digit reference is necessary “vintage”, but the guys over there have a crazy amount of knowledge and have been in the business of validating authenticity for a long time.

24 December 2022, 07:09 AM	#8
billyhsat "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2015 Real Name: William Location: San Antonio Watch: 14060, 16613 Posts: 46	AD in Busan South Korea, but as far as no date or name I can't advise whether that was an aok practice back then or not. Watch looks clean though.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)