The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 5 May 2023, 12:59 PM   #1
mattg6
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: usa
Posts: 89
1680 red - “tiny”bottom right lug. Known defect?

Now seem to 1680 red subs with a “tiny” bottom right lug. The camfers look factory and they’re presented as unpolished. But they’re clearly skinnier than the other 3 lugs. Was this a particular factory that made these and/or a particular period? Service case? Anyone seen this or have an idea

I have confirmed it’s not just the photo or lighting - in person it’s clearly smaller and I guess just came from the factory that way? Thought it was one off but have now seen two


mattg6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2023, 01:00 PM   #2
mattg6
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: usa
Posts: 89
Another shot of the skinny lug. Yes both sides of the case lugs aren’t supposed to be equal but it’s just the bottom one that looks skinny

mattg6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2023, 01:11 PM   #3
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,289
It simply looks refinished to me, the chamfer is also funny on that lug.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2023, 01:37 PM   #4
mattg6
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: usa
Posts: 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan S View Post
It simply looks refinished to me, the chamfer is also funny on that lug.

Occam’s razor!
mattg6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2023, 01:40 PM   #5
77T
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
77T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,013
Like Dan said…it appears to have been refinished for some dent/gouge that must’ve been deep enough to requiring reprofiling the chamfer. And that leaves the top looking thinner.

For a more accurate measurement maybe remove the bracelet and take photos from the backside. That way you’ll see the actual width of each lug without the optical confusion from the chamfering.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________


Does anyone really know what time it is?
77T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2023, 03:49 PM   #6
GGGMT
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GGGMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 8,345
Nasty polish. Nasty


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
GGGMT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2023, 11:20 PM   #7
swish77
2024 Pledge Member
 
swish77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,999
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattg6 View Post
The camfers look factory and they’re presented as unpolished.
I would say this is inaccurate.

Now, there are inconsistencies with cases on some vintage Rolexes, and crown guards sometimes are a little uneven. The lower crown guard on my unpolished 5512 is a little smaller, and it's a known feature on some Subs. (See below.)

However, the lug differences on that 1680 are too extreme and it would not have come from the factory that way. If it did, it was a defect/abnormality.
Attached Images
 
swish77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2023, 12:10 AM   #8
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattg6 View Post
Now seem to 1680 red subs with a “tiny” bottom right lug. The camfers look factory and they’re presented as unpolished. But they’re clearly skinnier than the other 3 lugs. Was this a particular factory that made these and/or a particular period? Service case? Anyone seen this or have an idea

. . .
You are looking at the width at the edge of the chamfer. The lug itself is not particularly "tiny", it just has a larger than normal chamfer at the end.

To say that a 50 year old watch is "unpolished" is usually laughable unless you find an original owner and its history is well documented.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2023, 06:43 AM   #9
Proto3
"TRF" Member
 
Proto3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2021
Real Name: Tony
Location: Atlanta
Watch: 1675
Posts: 101
I saw that watch listing. Suspiciously cheap.
Proto3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2023, 11:20 AM   #10
RFC
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Puerto Rico
Watch: 1968 5513 Sub
Posts: 450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
You are looking at the width at the edge of the chamfer. The lug itself is not particularly "tiny", it just has a larger than normal chamfer at the end.

To say that a 50 year old watch is "unpolished" is usually laughable unless you find an original owner and its history is well documented.
Spot on. Your last paragraph debunks some sellers marketing “lightly” polished or unpolished pieces when they are probably not. Like you said to find an unpolished vintage Sub is to find a needle in a haystack.
RFC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2023, 12:33 PM   #11
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,289
Quote:
Originally Posted by RFC View Post
Spot on. Your last paragraph debunks some sellers marketing “lightly” polished or unpolished pieces when they are probably not. Like you said to find an unpolished vintage Sub is to find a needle in a haystack.
"Needle in a haystack" precisely describes many of the watches owned by many forum members.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2023, 05:01 PM   #12
Lol-x
Facilitator
 
Lol-x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Omnipresent
Posts: 33,587
Yes I agree with Larry.
The lugs look to have been polished.
__________________

Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be. ~Abraham Lincoln
Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride. ~John F. Kennedy

ROLEXploitation - yeah I'm a victim
Lol-x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2023, 06:36 PM   #13
karleone
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Dayona
Posts: 2,269
Quote:
Originally Posted by swish77 View Post
I would say this is inaccurate.

Now, there are inconsistencies with cases on some vintage Rolexes, and crown guards sometimes are a little uneven. The lower crown guard on my unpolished 5512 is a little smaller, and it's a known feature on some Subs. (See below.)

However, the lug differences on that 1680 are too extreme and it would not have come from the factory that way. If it did, it was a defect/abnormality.
Beautiful 5512! Amazing condition!
karleone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2023, 02:20 AM   #14
swish77
2024 Pledge Member
 
swish77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,999
Quote:
Originally Posted by karleone View Post
Beautiful 5512! Amazing condition!
Thank you! It's the vintage Rolex i've had the longest.
swish77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2023, 03:10 AM   #15
TuRo
"TRF" Member
 
TuRo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Real Name: Paul
Location: Cantabrigia - G.B
Watch: ing the detectives
Posts: 2,832
Agree with others on your particular observation - but interestingly, crown side lugs and even north v south lugs do differ on some models...and of course the 37mm Daytonas the north pusher miles away from equal distance to the crown than the closer south pusher !!

Here's a fellas opinion on sports models...

https://atelierdegriff.com/2019/08/2...vintage-rolex/
__________________
Thieves and fools and long travelled soldiers, A candid light exposes their homes. Human falter, people bellowed from their homes. And houses, there's fools and long reigning pharaohs.

IT BITES - Yellow Christian
TuRo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2023, 03:11 AM   #16
decisive
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: US
Posts: 87
It’s not uncommon to see significant differences in the chamfers on these watches… they were hand finished. You can find photos all day of this. I wouldn’t classify this as a “nasty polish” either …
I believe these are factory chamfers. While worn, who knows if polished or not. If it was polished it was long ago. Lastly, the bottom right is also the leading “edge” when worn on the left hand.
decisive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2023, 09:05 AM   #17
springer
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
For me, it appears the same watchmaker polished both of those Subs giving both that "distinct" look - especially the bottom right lug. Hopefully that guy has retired by now.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2023, 05:36 PM   #18
zapokee
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Japan
Posts: 4,367
Factory lugs on the right were thinner on some models.

It can be clearly seen on this factory 1680 from some Rolex literature. (Credit to whoever posted it originally)
Attached Images
 
zapokee is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2023, 12:45 AM   #19
swish77
2024 Pledge Member
 
swish77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,999
Quote:
Originally Posted by decisive View Post
It’s not uncommon to see significant differences in the chamfers on these watches… they were hand finished.
I’ve yet to see one that has “significant” differences on an untouched example. Subtle differences, yes, but the OP’s example on the right shows quite an extreme difference in the lower right lug.

These were Swiss craftsmen working on watches by hand. They were not always going to achieve machine perfection, but they knew what they were doing.

Grand Seikos, even to this day, were all finished by hand, and those cases are/were amazingly perfect.
swish77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2023, 06:51 AM   #20
decisive
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: US
Posts: 87
Quote:
Originally Posted by swish77 View Post
I’ve yet to see one that has “significant” differences on an untouched example. Subtle differences, yes, but the OP’s example on the right shows quite an extreme difference in the lower right lug.

These were Swiss craftsmen working on watches by hand. They were not always going to achieve machine perfection, but they knew what they were doing.

Grand Seikos, even to this day, were all finished by hand, and those cases are/were amazingly perfect.
Even more common on gilt era watches.
decisive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2023, 06:53 PM   #21
PVR
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Darien, CT
Posts: 333
The reason you see the lugs thinner on the crown guard side is that the polishing wheel focuses on a smaller surface area because of the crown guards. Meaning, on the non crown guard side, you can gradually polish the entire length of the lugs with no interference, but when the crown guards are present, your wheel is more aggressively focused on the lug tips and smaller surface area..
PVR is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.