|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
7 July 2023, 11:37 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 113
|
116520 vs 116500 bracelet
Do the 116500 bracelets feel lighter and somewhat flimsier than the 116520?
|
|
|
|
7 July 2023, 11:48 AM
|
#2 | |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Gary
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 11,756
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 July 2023, 12:29 PM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Nation of Rolex
Watch: 116500 & 116520s
Posts: 198
|
No I have panda and both black and white 116250s with the updated clasp and RRR, the bracelets are the same.
Recall now there was an update to the bracelet mid 116250 cycle ~ V Series (2009) ish. Perhaps that is what you speak of
__________________
All day I dream about Daytona |
|
|
|
|
7 July 2023, 02:13 PM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: USA
Watch: ing my wrist
Posts: 1,268
|
I’d think it would be the opposite for the old style bracelet vs the new.
|
|
|
|
|
7 July 2023, 07:25 PM
|
#5 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: US, SG, DK, GR
Watch: Reverso
Posts: 3,089
|
The bracelet of the "late" 116520 (with long clasp) is exactly the same as the 116500. The bracelet of the "early" 116520 (with short clasp) is different, but none of them is "flimsy". The bracelet of the 16520 (if that's what you had in mind) feels less substantial but again, not flimsy by a long shot!
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
