ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
21 May 2023, 10:39 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Dublin, OH
Posts: 22
|
PAM01164 vs PAM02164 - 42MM Goldtech Submersible
Does anyone know of any differences between the PAM01164 and the PAM02164? It looks like the model number changed for 2023 and the MSRP went up a little, but otherwise I can't see anything different in terms of the specs. Both seem to have the same specs on Watchbase.
https://watchbase.com/panerai/submersible/pam01164 https://watchbase.com/panerai/submersible/pam02164 Anyone have any insights into why the model # might have changed? |
22 May 2023, 11:25 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Rick
Location: Wakanda
Watch: amacallit
Posts: 2,090
|
No difference
__________________
रोलेक्स |
23 May 2023, 04:49 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sweden
Watch: 1680
Posts: 1,874
|
So, I'm guessing here, but maybe thay changed the reference number indicating that the movement hacks again now?
|
24 May 2023, 06:07 PM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: canada
Posts: 460
|
|
25 May 2023, 02:56 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: NH
Watch: 228239, PAM00684
Posts: 2,121
|
Agree completely...I am happy I got the 684 with the original P.9010 movement. Not a fan of the movement change with the subsequent iterations.
__________________
Rolex 228239 PAM00684 |
30 August 2023, 11:21 PM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Dublin, OH
Posts: 22
|
Quote:
The 684 launched in 2017 and has the best movement and the ability to set the hour hand independently and has the hacking seconds, which I believe all the subsequent models lacked. It looks like in 2019 the 974 was launched. This switched out the inhouse movement to the generic one but at least it was still finished and had an open case back. The used some gold writing on the dial and added 300m water resistance. However a few articles mention that the rose Gold was changed to GoldTech for this model and it is more reddish. I haven't seen any side by side pictures between it and the older 684, so curious to know how much of a change it really was. It seems there weren't a lot of 974s produced before the change to the 1164 happened l, which got the closed case back and unfinished movement. Anyone seen a 974 and 684 side by side and can comment on differences in the gold color? https://www.watchcollectinglifestyle...74-introducing |
|
31 August 2023, 10:27 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: NH
Watch: 228239, PAM00684
Posts: 2,121
|
Quote:
I have had it for over 6 months now and the "new" watch feel hasn't worn off and it is my go to watch every morning over my WG DD40. I have owned a number of 44mm Luminors prior to this and the 42 is just perfect. The P.9010 movement is so much better too IMHO. Finishing is sharp and it holds up under a loupe.
__________________
Rolex 228239 PAM00684 |
|
5 September 2023, 11:01 PM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Dublin, OH
Posts: 22
|
Quote:
It will be interesting to put it side by side to one of the new versions just to see if the rose gold color changed at all. I looked at a ton of pictures and can't see a difference, but photo's don't always get colors quite right. |
|
6 September 2023, 02:41 AM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: NH
Watch: 228239, PAM00684
Posts: 2,121
|
Quote:
__________________
Rolex 228239 PAM00684 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.