The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17 May 2024, 01:57 AM   #31
njlam
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 721
Unless the 6 digit OP is your first watch ever, sell it.
__________________
Rolex Day-Date 118208 YG/Datejust 116139 WG/116231 TT/GMT2 116710 BLNR SS
Patek Calatrava 5096 RG - Omega Speedmaster 3861 Sapphire SS - Cartier Tank Louis 1140 YG
Panerai GMT 233 SS - Zenith ChronoMaster 01.0240.410 SS - Ebel 1911 Chrono 1134901 TT - JLC Reverso Duo Q2714910 SS
Laine V38 SS - Grand Seiko SGBA407 SS - Baltic Aquascaphe SS - Garmin Approach S62 - Casio GShock 5600/9502
TAG Heuer Formula One - Swatch MoonSwatch Mission to the Moon/Mercury/Jupiter/Neptune/Lava
njlam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 May 2024, 01:59 AM   #32
Giovannibravo
2024 Pledge Member
 
Giovannibravo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Canada
Watch: Sub| DJ41| 79540
Posts: 1,412
This 32 series movement issues are way over blown.
Giovannibravo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 May 2024, 03:08 AM   #33
Commander C.
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Dystopia
Posts: 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by Giovannibravo View Post
This 32 series movement issues are way over blown.
Or not. We don't really know, do we? We know the issue exists, but we don't know how extensive it is. The poll on this forum suggests that about 30% of 32XX movements will suffer from the low amplitude problem. The deniers/minimizers of the 32XX issue will argue that the poll captures only a tiny number of all of the 32XX Rolexes out there. This is true. On the other hand, the poll is of Rolex owners who have been paying attention to the accuracy of their watches -- which is the exact group of owners you would want to poll. And Rolex themselves refuse to acknowledge that the issue exists, which to me suggests that the problem is widespread. If the problem affected only a small percentage of units, and you cared about your customers, why not admit to the problem and reassure your customers that you will take care of it? That's what a reputable business would do.
Commander C. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 May 2024, 07:44 AM   #34
Dirt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,064
Quote:
Originally Posted by Commander C. View Post
Or not. We don't really know, do we? We know the issue exists, but we don't know how extensive it is. The poll on this forum suggests that about 30% of 32XX movements will suffer from the low amplitude problem. The deniers/minimizers of the 32XX issue will argue that the poll captures only a tiny number of all of the 32XX Rolexes out there. This is true. On the other hand, the poll is of Rolex owners who have been paying attention to the accuracy of their watches -- which is the exact group of owners you would want to poll. And Rolex themselves refuse to acknowledge that the issue exists, which to me suggests that the problem is widespread. If the problem affected only a small percentage of units, and you cared about your customers, why not admit to the problem and reassure your customers that you will take care of it? That's what a reputable business would do.
Beautifully said

But the closed shop cover up must continue until they deem a satisfsctory resolution is reached.
As good as Rolex has been until now, we must accept the possibility that they may hsve made a mess of it.
Awsome watches.
Shame about the movements
Dirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 May 2024, 09:10 AM   #35
TickTockChuck
"TRF" Member
 
TickTockChuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Real Name: Chuck
Location: Canada
Watch: Rolex 116610LV
Posts: 2,270
Hmmm...I wonder if the busy little Rolex watch elves are quietly working on the next gen 33XX movement at a secret Swiss Alps chalet location. My 32XX is okay so far, but I'm a little concerned about the future, but not planning on selling over something that may never happen. Rolex will make a fortune off out of warranty repairs perhaps....ha!. Cheers
TickTockChuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.