ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 May 2024, 01:57 AM | #31 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 721
|
Unless the 6 digit OP is your first watch ever, sell it.
__________________
Rolex Day-Date 118208 YG/Datejust 116139 WG/116231 TT/GMT2 116710 BLNR SS Patek Calatrava 5096 RG - Omega Speedmaster 3861 Sapphire SS - Cartier Tank Louis 1140 YG Panerai GMT 233 SS - Zenith ChronoMaster 01.0240.410 SS - Ebel 1911 Chrono 1134901 TT - JLC Reverso Duo Q2714910 SS Laine V38 SS - Grand Seiko SGBA407 SS - Baltic Aquascaphe SS - Garmin Approach S62 - Casio GShock 5600/9502 TAG Heuer Formula One - Swatch MoonSwatch Mission to the Moon/Mercury/Jupiter/Neptune/Lava |
17 May 2024, 01:59 AM | #32 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Canada
Watch: Sub| DJ41| 79540
Posts: 1,412
|
This 32 series movement issues are way over blown.
|
17 May 2024, 03:08 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Dystopia
Posts: 85
|
Or not. We don't really know, do we? We know the issue exists, but we don't know how extensive it is. The poll on this forum suggests that about 30% of 32XX movements will suffer from the low amplitude problem. The deniers/minimizers of the 32XX issue will argue that the poll captures only a tiny number of all of the 32XX Rolexes out there. This is true. On the other hand, the poll is of Rolex owners who have been paying attention to the accuracy of their watches -- which is the exact group of owners you would want to poll. And Rolex themselves refuse to acknowledge that the issue exists, which to me suggests that the problem is widespread. If the problem affected only a small percentage of units, and you cared about your customers, why not admit to the problem and reassure your customers that you will take care of it? That's what a reputable business would do.
|
17 May 2024, 07:44 AM | #34 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,064
|
Quote:
But the closed shop cover up must continue until they deem a satisfsctory resolution is reached. As good as Rolex has been until now, we must accept the possibility that they may hsve made a mess of it. Awsome watches. Shame about the movements |
|
17 May 2024, 09:10 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Real Name: Chuck
Location: Canada
Watch: Rolex 116610LV
Posts: 2,270
|
Hmmm...I wonder if the busy little Rolex watch elves are quietly working on the next gen 33XX movement at a secret Swiss Alps chalet location. My 32XX is okay so far, but I'm a little concerned about the future, but not planning on selling over something that may never happen. Rolex will make a fortune off out of warranty repairs perhaps....ha!. Cheers
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.