The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 27 May 2024, 02:38 AM   #1
benderschweiz
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Ohio
Posts: 16
Submariner 16800s circa 84

I was looking at a few 16800s from around 1984. Not really concerned about the cases but interested in thoughts on the dials and inserts and if they are correct. The first both dial and insert look correct to me for that time.

[IMG][/IMG]

In the second insert doesn't look like straight or flat four so must be 90s service insert?

[IMG][/IMG]

Not sure about the insert in the third? Looks like a straight 4 which would be correct. Several of the serifs look different from other sub inserts I've looked at from original straight 4 inserts. The dial says Swiss Made I haven't seen on 16800s. Is this a later dial?

[IMG][/IMG]
benderschweiz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2024, 04:52 AM   #2
0nly5iv3Digits
"TRF" Member
 
0nly5iv3Digits's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: EARTH
Watch: What is "watch"?
Posts: 1,347
The first two watches are 16800s.

1st watch - Looks good.

You're correct about the 2nd watch. It has a service insert. The tell is the fact that it doesn't have "hooked" 2's and 4's.

3rd watch - not a 16800. Rather, it is a 16610.
__________________
UNpolished or I’m not interested” 😎
2FA Enabled
0nly5iv3Digits is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 May 2024, 04:32 AM   #3
benderschweiz
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Ohio
Posts: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by 0nly5iv3Digits View Post
The first two watches are 16800s.

1st watch - Looks good.

You're correct about the 2nd watch. It has a service insert. The tell is the fact that it doesn't have "hooked" 2's and 4's.

3rd watch - not a 16800. Rather, it is a 16610.
Thanks for your response. So if the third watch has a serial 8,471,679. Then it would have to be a
16610 dial on an earlier case correct? Looks like 16610s started around 88.
benderschweiz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 May 2024, 07:35 PM   #4
TuRo
"TRF" Member
 
TuRo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Real Name: Paul
Location: Cantabrigia - G.B
Watch: ing the detectives
Posts: 2,832
Quote:
Originally Posted by benderschweiz View Post
Thanks for your response. So if the third watch has a serial 8,471,679. Then it would have to be a
16610 dial on an earlier case correct? Looks like 16610s started around 88.
3rd a 16800 (might have been matte originally as on cusp SRL no) with a 13/16800-814 post-2006 service dial (installed when the up to 99 'T25' and post-2000 'SWISS' service stock started running out). As below:

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/196147033...mis&media=COPY
__________________
Thieves and fools and long travelled soldiers, A candid light exposes their homes. Human falter, people bellowed from their homes. And houses, there's fools and long reigning pharaohs.

IT BITES - Yellow Christian
TuRo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.