The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 1 December 2024, 01:21 AM   #1
mpnunes
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Belmont, CA
Posts: 138
Which would you choose?

All are 16570 Polars but trying to decide between 1) Swiss only dial, full set, 2) Swiss made, holes case SEL bracelet (no B&P), 3) later model 3186 with full set. There are price differences (3186 most expensive of the bunch), but not factoring that in to the decision. Wouldn’t sell anytime soon, but overall collectibility is a consideration for me. I like the idea of SEL/holes case for strap changes, but not sure that outweighs lack of B&P. Thoughts??
mpnunes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 December 2024, 01:31 AM   #2
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,044
Well speaking for myself would not pay extra for a 3186 movement that's for sure so just buy the one that best condition and price your comfortable in paying.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 1 December 2024, 02:29 AM   #3
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 77,926
I much prefer buying complete sets
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 December 2024, 03:21 AM   #4
mpnunes
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Belmont, CA
Posts: 138
Yeah, complete set is an important consideration. Narrowed to the Swiss only dial and the 3186, both with complete set. Any final words of wisdom? Leaning towards the 3186.
mpnunes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 December 2024, 04:24 AM   #5
mpnunes
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Belmont, CA
Posts: 138
Done deal. Going for 3186. Will post pics!
mpnunes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 December 2024, 04:26 AM   #6
rockmastermike
2024 Pledge Member
 
rockmastermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: GA
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 4,415
Quote:
Originally Posted by mpnunes View Post
Done deal. Going for 3186. Will post pics!
Congratulations - looking forward to your pictures
rockmastermike is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 1 December 2024, 04:46 AM   #7
Roddypeepa
"TRF" Member
 
Roddypeepa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Real Name: Mark
Location: Southern England
Watch: DJ41 SubC SMP mast
Posts: 1,683
Well it depends whether you like the interaction with the 3185 and its wobbly jumping hour hand. But it’s supposed to be an extremely tough, well made and long lasting one. Like most Rolex movements really.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Roddypeepa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 December 2024, 05:09 AM   #8
0nly5iv3Digits
"TRF" Member
 
0nly5iv3Digits's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: EARTH
Watch: What is "watch"?
Posts: 1,327
If your 3186 has the "thin" hour marker surrounds" dial, that would be a dealbreaker for me.
__________________
UNpolished or I’m not interested” 😎
2FA Enabled
0nly5iv3Digits is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 December 2024, 07:14 AM   #9
mpnunes
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Belmont, CA
Posts: 138
A few quick pics
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg IMG_8478-compressed.jpeg (144.3 KB, 347 views)
File Type: jpeg IMG_8477-compressed.jpeg (156.1 KB, 348 views)
mpnunes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 December 2024, 07:27 AM   #10
rmagoo57
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
rmagoo57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Ron
Location: Detroitish
Watch: GMT II/Sub/Exp II
Posts: 2,550
Great choice!!
rmagoo57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 December 2024, 10:18 AM   #11
piratfisk
"TRF" Member
 
piratfisk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Real Name: Jake
Location: Slam Diego
Watch: 16233, 116619LB
Posts: 2,312
Excellent choice & congrats. I like it in both the thin & thick hour surrounds. This level of nit-pickery is only found here. Wear it in good health.
__________________
What's the time? It's time to get ill.

Wishlist: 128236; 16202BC; 5396G
piratfisk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 December 2024, 10:42 AM   #12
mpnunes
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Belmont, CA
Posts: 138
Quote:
Originally Posted by piratfisk View Post
Excellent choice & congrats. I like it in both the thin & thick hour surrounds. This level of nit-pickery is only found here. Wear it in good health.
Thanks! Curious what everyone means by thick vs thin hour surrounds? Is there a difference in these late model 16570s?
mpnunes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 December 2024, 10:51 AM   #13
77T
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
77T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 41,955
There are dial differences and the polar dialed ones show it in the black surrounds on the hour plots.

If you have already committed, it means you liked it as it looks so don't fret over one comment. I'm sure it will serve you well for years.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________


Does anyone really know what time it is?
77T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 December 2024, 11:02 AM   #14
Duey
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Duey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Duey
Location: Maui
Watch: Too Many To List
Posts: 3,597
I would pass on the 3186.
This was the first iteration of the movement that had the Jumping Hour Click Spring issue.

The broken spring issue on the early 3186 are well known.
Duey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 December 2024, 11:31 AM   #15
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,581
Lugholes. Always lugholes
__________________
subtona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 December 2024, 11:56 AM   #16
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,510
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duey View Post
I would pass on the 3186.
This was the first iteration of the movement that had the Jumping Hour Click Spring issue.

The broken spring issue on the early 3186 are well known.
I have had no issues with my 3186 movements (both 2008 models) but I did read of a 3186 user posting that he could spin through the dates just as fast as a quickset?

__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 December 2024, 11:46 PM   #17
1William
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,671
Congratulations.
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2024, 01:07 AM   #18
pk552502
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Real Name: Paul
Location: ohio
Watch: 16570 black
Posts: 510
I don't think you could go wrong with any of the options really and it looks like the one you bought is in nice overall condition. I personally would have gone with the swiss only dial and papers all else being equal. I say condition is the most important factor though.
pk552502 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2024, 03:14 AM   #19
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,502
Good looking watch. I do prefer lug holes and SELs on these models. I do not see any benefit with a 3185 or 3186 movement, but preferences are what the chase is all about.

One of mine.

DividerBack4.jpg
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2024, 03:55 AM   #20
mpnunes
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Belmont, CA
Posts: 138
Thanks again all! Really happy with this decision. The final factor was that it seems to be in unpolished condition and came with a Rolex service card (so I know it’s been cared for). Couldn’t be happier. Including a morning pic!
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg IMG_8486-compressed.jpeg (157.0 KB, 105 views)
mpnunes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2024, 04:30 AM   #21
Jackie Daytona
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Jackie Daytona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Brian
Location: Nashville
Watch: 16750
Posts: 6,613
#2 option for me as long as condition is good.

I have the 3186 option and while I enjoy the uniqueness of the engraved rehaut and all I absolutely wouldn’t pay extra for it. Plus I would’ve liked to have lug holes.
__________________
16750 | 6516(wife’s) | 126334 | 16570 | SBGA413 | SRPE33 | 126610LV
Jackie Daytona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2024, 04:45 AM   #22
RolexDave68
"TRF" Member
 
RolexDave68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Real Name: Dave
Location: USA
Watch: SUB 116613LN
Posts: 2,877
Quote:
Originally Posted by mpnunes View Post
Thanks again all! Really happy with this decision. The final factor was that it seems to be in unpolished condition and came with a Rolex service card (so I know it’s been cared for). Couldn’t be happier. Including a morning pic!

Congrats looks like years of enjoyment, cheers to enjoying this journey
RolexDave68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.