The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25 September 2009, 04:30 PM   #1
Poohsan
"TRF" Member
 
Poohsan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Arron
Location: phoenix, AZ
Watch: GMT 1675
Posts: 764
Replacing the clasp on a 9315 folded oyster bracelet

I am replacing the clasp on my 9315 folded oyster bracelet. Can anyone tell me how to open the connecting ling between the clasp and the first link in the bracelet? Is there a special trick to opening this link with out buggering it up?

Thanks,
Arron


Last edited by Poohsan; 25 September 2009 at 04:32 PM.. Reason: Title edit.
Poohsan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 September 2009, 10:47 PM   #2
Balboa
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: SoCal OC U.S.A.
Posts: 342
I would remove the drive pin that that holds the link and clasp. You can do this with a small pin punch and hammer, but it is much easier and safer to use a bracelet pin tool.

They are available on eBay and from any watch parts dealer. Under $20.

Mark
Balboa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 September 2009, 11:58 PM   #3
Poohsan
"TRF" Member
 
Poohsan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Arron
Location: phoenix, AZ
Watch: GMT 1675
Posts: 764
Mark,

I'm not sure if that is possible. This is the link that connects to the bracelet clasp on the flip lock side. Wouldn't I need to grind off the mushroomed ends on the pin?

Thanks,
Arron
Poohsan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2009, 12:17 AM   #4
Balboa
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: SoCal OC U.S.A.
Posts: 342
Good question. I just removed the clasp from a 7835 folded link bracelet. The pin has straight ends and remains in place by friction. Wonder if you can just replace your current pin with a straight one?

I'm sure that folded link can be opened, but there is always the concern of ending up with wrinkles on the front side of the link. (Been there)

Be patient. Someone will chime in here with the easiest and safest way to go.

Mark
Balboa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2009, 03:46 AM   #5
koronet-kid
"TRF" Member
 
koronet-kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: John
Location: AT HOME
Watch: deep-sea Comex
Posts: 676
Rolex have a special die that they sit the bracelet in and they can then un-fold the link to enable the clasp to be replaced. i would not try to do it yourself i feel it a bit to involed to be a diy job

regards

sean
koronet-kid is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2009, 07:48 AM   #6
DadsWatch72
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
Ask Dalton.
DadsWatch72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2009, 11:34 AM   #7
DadsWatch72
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poohsan View Post
I am replacing the clasp on my 9315 folded oyster bracelet. Can anyone tell me how to open the connecting ling between the clasp and the first link in the bracelet? Is there a special trick to opening this link with out buggering it up?

Thanks,
Arron

Are you replacing it with a correct clasp? Where did you get it?
DadsWatch72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2009, 03:19 PM   #8
Poohsan
"TRF" Member
 
Poohsan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Arron
Location: phoenix, AZ
Watch: GMT 1675
Posts: 764
Quote:
Originally Posted by DadsWatch72 View Post
Are you replacing it with a correct clasp? Where did you get it?
The clasps are the same. The only difference is the replacement clasp is a couple years newer than the original. I would like to keep the connecting link that is currently on the bracelet. I do not want to use the connecting link that came with the replacement clasp. The image I originally posted is not of my band. It was just for illustration purposes only. Below are images of the clasps.

- Arron






Last edited by Poohsan; 26 September 2009 at 04:10 PM.. Reason: Added images
Poohsan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2009, 08:22 AM   #9
Poohsan
"TRF" Member
 
Poohsan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Arron
Location: phoenix, AZ
Watch: GMT 1675
Posts: 764
Well I decided not to fight with the original claps and connecting link. So I used the one that came with the replacement clasp. Everything went ok and now I have the newer clasp installed on my 1680. This corrects several issues I had with the band. :)

- Arron

Poohsan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2009, 03:28 AM   #10
Dalton
TechXpert
 
Dalton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Dal
Location: Seattle
Watch: 168000
Posts: 1,614
Well I'm glad you're happy, but FYI: the ends need to be gringded off, then replaced and flattened at the ends to hold in the lip lock, you basically cant do it without having at least a pneumatic hammer.
Dalton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2009, 10:02 AM   #11
DadsWatch72
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
I am wondering if you noticed that the crowns look a little different on each bracelet. Can you comment on why they would be slightly different Dalton????
DadsWatch72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2009, 10:53 AM   #12
Poohsan
"TRF" Member
 
Poohsan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Arron
Location: phoenix, AZ
Watch: GMT 1675
Posts: 764
The original clasp is several years older than the replacement. It had been lightly sanded in the past to remove scratches. The replacement clasp has never been sanded. The crown on the replacement clasp has more detail. I think that is why the crowns may look a little different. It could also be different tooling used during the manufacturing process.

-Arron

Dalton?
Poohsan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2009, 11:44 AM   #13
Czechman
"TRF" Member
 
Czechman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Watch: See my signature
Posts: 1,189
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dalton View Post
you basically cant do it without having at least a pneumatic hammer.
A pneumatic hammer?
That's a joke, right?

A steel pin that long would bend before the end swelled up from being hammered on, wouldn't it?
__________________
"Woody and Jen say hey from North Kakalaki"

19019, 19018x3, 17000x2, 16570x2, 16220, 5700, 1501, 6564, 16030, 16710, 16610

Czechman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2009, 02:14 PM   #14
DadsWatch72
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poohsan View Post
The original clasp is several years older than the replacement. It had been lightly sanded in the past to remove scratches. The replacement clasp has never been sanded. The crown on the replacement clasp has more detail. I think that is why the crowns may look a little different. It could also be different tooling used during the manufacturing process.

-Arron

Dalton?
The steelinox text is also in a slightly different position from the Rolex symbol on the replacement??
DadsWatch72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2009, 02:39 PM   #15
Poohsan
"TRF" Member
 
Poohsan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Arron
Location: phoenix, AZ
Watch: GMT 1675
Posts: 764
Quote:
Originally Posted by DadsWatch72 View Post
The steelinox text is also in a slightly different position from the Rolex symbol on the replacement??
I've noticed that the stamping on many older clasp tends to wonder. I have 3 classic bands and each has the stamping in a slightly different location. I would gather that the Steelinox and Patent stamps are put on the clasp in a secondary operation.

- Arron
Poohsan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2009, 03:42 AM   #16
Dalton
TechXpert
 
Dalton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Dal
Location: Seattle
Watch: 168000
Posts: 1,614
Quote:
Originally Posted by Czechman View Post
A pneumatic hammer?
That's a joke, right?

A steel pin that long would bend before the end swelled up from being hammered on, wouldn't it?
No joke, there are ways of doing it by hand, but you'd have to be very good with a dremel, heat and hammer. A bench hammer is faster to work with and gives you a better looking finished product, and doesn't come out looking like a pin that was once on medieval armor.
Dalton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2009, 05:03 AM   #17
Czechman
"TRF" Member
 
Czechman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Watch: See my signature
Posts: 1,189
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dalton View Post
a dremel, heat and hammer
Ah, HEAT, that's the magic word. Thanks for clarifying that.
__________________
"Woody and Jen say hey from North Kakalaki"

19019, 19018x3, 17000x2, 16570x2, 16220, 5700, 1501, 6564, 16030, 16710, 16610

Czechman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.