The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 29 October 2009, 12:17 PM   #1
Foodman
"TRF" Member
 
Foodman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Paul
Location: WI, USA
Watch: Milgauss, Sub
Posts: 33
Fortune Magazine

The November 9th issue of Fortune has a small "watch guide" in it. They claim "The newest hue is blue" and "Brown is the new basic." They also say the following about the $29,850 Rolex: "The 2009 blue-dial, white-gold Submariner is a rare investment item - expect it to retain, if not gain, value over time." It's appropriately titled "Life at the Top."
Foodman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2009, 12:20 PM   #2
R1@160@alltimes
"TRF" Member
 
R1@160@alltimes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: ♛
Posts: 4,408
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foodman View Post
The November 9th issue of Fortune has a small "watch guide" in it. They claim "The newest hue is blue" and "Brown is the new basic." They also say the following about the $29,850 Rolex: "The 2009 blue-dial, white-gold Submariner is a rare investment item - expect it to retain, if not gain, value over time." It's appropriately titled "Life at the Top."
With the recent gold prices....why not?
__________________
R1@160@alltimes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2009, 12:40 PM   #3
Joey_V
"TRF" Member
 
Joey_V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Joey
Location: Dallas, TX
Watch: SS Sub 16610 M
Posts: 3,824
Love the smurf...
__________________

Current Rotation: Rolex Submariner Date (M) - 1/08, Rolex Milgauss GV (V) - 2/10, Rolex SS Black Daytona (V) - 6/10, Rolex GMTIIC (G) - 5/11, TAG Heuer Silverstone (286/1860) - 1/2015
Former-watches: Omega PO/2535.80/2254, TAG Carrera/F1x2/Monaco, Panerai 312K/292L
Wish List: Panerai 270/505, Rolex SMURF, Rolex RG Daytona, Rolex DSSD
Joey_V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2009, 12:58 PM   #4
mustangbrad
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: brad
Location: il
Watch: 16613
Posts: 286
Don't count on any gain in value. The only value currently losing is the value of our dollars and higher inflation.
mustangbrad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2009, 01:07 PM   #5
deserted
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: fort wayne IN
Watch: Patek 1909003
Posts: 2,176
There's something about that smurf blue, i'm starting to love it....My AD has one and i've tried on , it's very heavy in weight but looks really good in person...
deserted is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2009, 01:11 PM   #6
R1@160@alltimes
"TRF" Member
 
R1@160@alltimes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: ♛
Posts: 4,408
Quote:
Originally Posted by mustangbrad View Post
Don't count on any gain in value. The only value currently losing is the value of our dollars and higher inflation.
value of a dollor goes down = gold price goes up
inflation goes up = gold price goes up
__________________
R1@160@alltimes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2009, 01:29 PM   #7
nektar
"TRF" Member
 
nektar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Louisiana
Watch: 114060
Posts: 1,678
ridiculous post.. to me , a rolex cannot be considered an investement.just a way to satisfy yourself without lose everything
nektar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2009, 01:58 PM   #8
Speed
"TRF" Member
 
Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
Fortune is a business "glossy" don't expect anything article a WIS would appreciate / agree with.
Speed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2009, 02:15 PM   #9
rob
2024 Pledge Member
 
rob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Northern Ca.
Watch: SS only
Posts: 865
Nice thought! Where do they get their data?
rob is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2009, 05:20 PM   #10
mda
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Don
Location: Midwest
Posts: 46
I was flipping through Fortune today and wondered why they had Patek Philippe ad on the back cover, and Rolex Daytona ad inside the front cover. hmm......
mda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2009, 05:30 PM   #11
sturgeon123456
"TRF" Member
 
sturgeon123456's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,551
The actual weight of gold in a wg sub is probably 140 grams (without movement)

140 grams of 18k (75% pure)= 105 grams of actual gold

105 grams = 3.4 ounces of gold

3.4 grams of gold at todays market value = $3 700 USD

Ummmmmmm better off investing in credit suisse gold bars......that sub aint going up based on gold value......it also seems obvious that the all gold models LOOSE the most value the quickest.
sturgeon123456 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2009, 06:16 PM   #12
Singslinger
"TRF" Member
 
Singslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,424
Thanks for posting. Even if most us don't agree with the WG Sub being a "rare investment'', it's good to know how mistaken some people can be, even supposedly investment-savvy sources like Fortune.
Singslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2009, 07:17 PM   #13
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,527
Quote:
Originally Posted by sturgeon123456 View Post
The actual weight of gold in a wg sub is probably 140 grams (without movement)

140 grams of 18k (75% pure)= 105 grams of actual gold

105 grams = 3.4 ounces of gold

3.4 grams of gold at todays market value = $3 700 USD

Ummmmmmm better off investing in credit suisse gold bars......that sub aint going up based on gold value......it also seems obvious that the all gold models LOOSE the most value the quickest.
You are getting a bit mixed up there mate......better to buy Ozzie dollars.
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 October 2009, 02:10 AM   #14
Welshwatchman
"TRF" Member
 
Welshwatchman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
Quote:
Originally Posted by sturgeon123456 View Post
The actual weight of gold in a wg sub is probably 140 grams (without movement)

140 grams of 18k (75% pure)= 105 grams of actual gold

105 grams = 3.4 ounces of gold

3.4 grams of gold at todays market value = $3 700 USD

Ummmmmmm better off investing in credit suisse gold bars......that sub aint going up based on gold value......it also seems obvious that the all gold models LOOSE the most value the quickest.
The weight sans movement would be closer to 200g though still not a lot of gold for your money of course.
Welshwatchman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 October 2009, 03:33 AM   #15
ingoodtime
"TRF" Member
 
ingoodtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,834
Quote:
Originally Posted by sturgeon123456 View Post
The actual weight of gold in a wg sub is probably 140 grams (without movement)

140 grams of 18k (75% pure)= 105 grams of actual gold

105 grams = 3.4 ounces of gold

3.4 grams of gold at todays market value = $3 700 USD

Ummmmmmm better off investing in credit suisse gold bars......that sub aint going up based on gold value......it also seems obvious that the all gold models LOOSE the most value the quickest.

If the above is true, Valentine, let me be the first to offer you 5000.00 for your YG 50th ann. GMT with green dial. If you don't respond within 10 minutes, I am dropping my offer to 4500.00. LOL!
ingoodtime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 October 2009, 09:07 AM   #16
snowbird
"TRF" Member
 
snowbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 2,157
Quote:
Originally Posted by mda View Post
I was flipping through Fortune today and wondered why they had Patek Philippe ad on the back cover, and Rolex Daytona ad inside the front cover. hmm......
Well that's a nice picture of the Daytona in the ad.

I've seen that same Patek ad in several magazines lately e.g. same back cover spot on a magazine inside the Financial Times. Patek seems to really focus on the idea that a Patek is an heirloom you can pass down . . .
snowbird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 October 2009, 10:04 AM   #17
Nick1959
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York
Watch: Rolex DSSD
Posts: 558
I think appreciationwise SS will do better than WG or YG
__________________
Regards,
Nick
Rolex Oyster Perpetual, DSSD,TT GMT IIC Daytona SS Breitling Chronomat
CX 20000 Swiss Military,Longine Grande
Nick1959 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 October 2009, 10:41 AM   #18
The GMT Master
"TRF" Member
 
The GMT Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,150
Any 18ct watch is horrendous as far as depreciation goes, I think they could do with a rethink
The GMT Master is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.