ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
13 January 2010, 11:38 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Gary
Location: GMT-6
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,350
|
If it didn't rattle it wouldn't feel right.
__________________
Omega Seamaster 300M GMT Noire Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 8500 Benson 1937 Sterling Silver Hunter |
13 January 2010, 12:15 PM | #32 |
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 318
|
Never had problems with the older type bracelet and clasps. I actually like them for their simplicity, and beautiful Rolex stamp It looks and feels so old skool However, I have to admit the newer solid versions are more comfortable overall, ableit heavier. Cheers, |
13 January 2010, 04:34 PM | #33 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Steve
Location: UK
Watch: Rolex Seadweller
Posts: 253
|
I have a Seadweller and date Sub, both less than two years old and both used for diving and have experienced no problems. I also have a Tudor Sub on a Rolex bracelet that I bought in 1981 and which is still working perfectly and has never let me down in any way. I've read many complaints about the folding mechanism of the Rolex bracelet, but my observation is that it's a tried and trusted design. The Omega folding clasp "bit" is made from three pieces of steel that allow a degree of lateral movement that the Rolex does not. This puts a lot of pressure on the pin that holds the clasp together and which broke last year on my PO. Omega (apparently) doesn't replace the pin and put a completely new clasp on instead at a cost of £80!
I agree the Rolex clasp arangement may feel a bit "tinny" but it works. It's all very well to have chunky, thick steel bracelets, but they still have to be held together with comparatively fragile pins. What sets Rolex divers apart in my view, is their "real-world" use that has influenced their design characteristics: military and Comex. Just my tuppence worth. |
13 January 2010, 06:29 PM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
They have a certain 'historic' appeal and can work satisfactorily for decades, but... still look & feels cheap. Fine back in the 70s, but not at today's prices with today's design/engineering capabilities. Also they feel too flimsy when open, as if could be easily bent by hand. The new clasps have had their problems, but they are a big step in the right direction - especially the Glidelock.
Cheers
__________________
|
13 January 2010, 06:48 PM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: luke standing
Location: england
Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue
Posts: 3,997
|
I dont like the new tapering bracelets and i have a Longines Hydro-conquest with a nice parallel 22mm bracelet which seems stronger than the GMT 11c. The new bracelets seem stronger in feel, but even they have their problems, never had any probs with my Sub or GMT.
|
13 January 2010, 06:53 PM | #36 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: Sydney
Watch: The Game
Posts: 17,415
|
Quote:
|
|
13 January 2010, 08:47 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Martin
Location: UK
Posts: 7,023
|
Rolex bracelets have stood the test of time, no problems with older style
|
13 January 2010, 09:03 PM | #38 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,062
|
Likewise SD subs too and using them what they was intended for with many 100s of dives underwater.And while working as a instructor and dive guide on various live-aboard boats world wide never ever had any problem with any fliplock oyster.On one occasion while wearing a SD bracelet held my almost 15stone dangling over the side a zodiac boat for several minutes until the weakest link the spring bar failed.But good job it did might have damaged my wrist a lot more.Watch was lost to the abyss watch easily replaced but body parts are not.The fliplock has a well proven track record in the field for almost 50 years.While the new clasp is a new kid on the block and it has a long way to go before it get the same credentials as the fliplock.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
14 January 2010, 07:59 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Dan
Location: Essex, UK
Watch: West Ham! COYI!!
Posts: 7,941
|
Great info' Gents..... Thankyou!!
__________________
Onwards & Upwards Rodders...... Onwards & Upwards. Life is not about how fast you can run or how high you can climb........... It's about how well you can bounce!! TRF HALL OF FAME JANUARY 2010 |
14 January 2010, 08:02 AM | #40 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Not here anymore
Posts: 4,787
|
I have never worn the new style, but the old style on my Sub is very very comfortable. It's a heavy watch and I sometimes forget I have it on, right now I haven't taken my Sub off in 3 days and it feels like a part of me, total comfort.
|
14 January 2010, 08:24 AM | #41 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: UTC/GMT +1 Hours
Watch: 16570
Posts: 250
|
Hiya! Is there any difference on the bracelets on SUB V-series compared to older models?
///mascot |
14 January 2010, 12:24 PM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 593
|
It's a Jubilee, not an Oyster, but it's the old style. And who out there is going to say it's not a work of art. No problems with it either.
|
14 January 2010, 04:31 PM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Outside
Watch: Isn't it obvious?
Posts: 1,926
|
I have had problems with the clasps on all of my Subs opening when I hit the water on a dive. It has happened with all of them -- the Sub, TT Sub and SD. It is annoying and all too common.
__________________
Subfiend |
14 January 2010, 04:45 PM | #44 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,529
|
My "Z" Explorer II never opened up on me. I've never had any problems with it either. But after wearing a PO for about a month, I dont think I would ever go back to the old clasps. If they had the new clasps, I'd jump on it like white on rice. Only if I could find an awesome deal on a DJ with roman numerals. :)
__________________
2 FACTOR AUTHENTICATION ENABLED. |
14 January 2010, 09:05 PM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: steve
Location: dallas area
Watch: 50's TT t-bird
Posts: 3,689
|
I've got a 50's DJ, and it's still OK.
|
14 January 2010, 09:34 PM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 9,407
|
I have had problems with my clasp.
All that money and only 50 years of continued use through three generations before a rivet went. Rolex, that just aint good enough! Buy Omega! J |
14 January 2010, 10:00 PM | #47 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,062
|
Now very true Jim to some they may look flimsy, but in the real world with millions upon millions of Rolex world wide they sure stood the test of time.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
14 January 2010, 10:11 PM | #48 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Manchester, M16
Watch: SS GMT-IIc
Posts: 106
|
Quote:
fingers are crossed that my new baby (a GMT-IIc) will be similarly reliable and robust! |
|
14 January 2010, 10:41 PM | #49 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 9,407
|
Quote:
That watch has been all over the place including jungles and deserts. Who says the clasps are flimsy? 53 years old this year and still ticking away! J |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.