ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
22 January 2010, 05:57 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: DFW
Posts: 364
|
Difference between 16013 and 16233?
Probably a simple question, but what is primarily the difference in these two models? I'm looking at both and they appear the same to my eyes. The 16233 is priced higher and it might be newer(?) and that is the only difference I can see. Both are SS/18K yg. Both have what looks like the same jubilee bracelet. Both have the same dials with Roman numerals and what looks like the same hands. One of them does have the numbers upside down for the 5(V) and 6(VI).
Thanks! |
22 January 2010, 06:01 AM | #2 | |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
Quote:
The 16013 was the older TT DJ with acrylic crystal and, in some cases, 14K gold (I should know.....that was my very first Rolex way back in Oct. 1980). The 16233 came in with the sapphire crystal and all models with 18K gold only. Unsure, if there was a change in movement. The Jubilee bracelet would be the same on both models. Hollow centre gold links with normal steel clasp. JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
|
22 January 2010, 06:02 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Scott
Location: GMT -7
Watch: GMT's & Sub's
Posts: 10,401
|
The 16013 has a Finely Engine Turned bezel and the 16233 has a Engine Turned bezel. I believe the 16013 is an older watch as well.
Scott
__________________
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin Member No. 922 |
22 January 2010, 06:03 AM | #4 | |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
Quote:
Engine-turned bezels were fitted only to the SS models!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
|
22 January 2010, 06:17 AM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Wolfgang
Location: New Jersey.
Watch: Rolex Tudor Omega
Posts: 5,592
|
JJ, you forgot that engine turned bezels were available on the TT Date and all gold Date models as well as some TT and all gold OP's.
|
22 January 2010, 06:17 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Alejandro
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 185
|
|
22 January 2010, 06:20 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Scott
Location: GMT -7
Watch: GMT's & Sub's
Posts: 10,401
|
Quote:
JJ, I was just going by my chart for the bezel difference.... Type of Bezel... 0 Polished 1 Finely Engine Turned 2 Engine Turned 3 Fluted 4 Hand-Crafted 5 Pyramid 6 Rotating Bezel
__________________
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin Member No. 922 |
|
22 January 2010, 06:21 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Alejandro
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 185
|
what does a pyramid bezel look like ?
|
22 January 2010, 06:24 AM | #9 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Wolfgang
Location: New Jersey.
Watch: Rolex Tudor Omega
Posts: 5,592
|
|
22 January 2010, 06:29 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Alejandro
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 185
|
gotcha, hadn't heard of that before
|
22 January 2010, 07:06 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Jib
Location: SJ, California
Watch: sun dial
Posts: 8,189
|
|
22 January 2010, 07:09 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: DFW
Posts: 364
|
SO the main differences
16233 is newer 16233 is SS and the 16013 is not(??) 16233 is 18k and 16013 can be 14K or 18K The jubilee band on both is hollow so it's light wieght probably like a Tudor jubilee. Do both use the same 3035 movement? |
22 January 2010, 07:20 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: GMT+1
Posts: 2,711
|
The caliber differs:
Caliber 3035 in all DJ 160XX Caliber 3135 in all DJ 162XX The change of crystal and caliber was the main thing going from 160XX to 162XX. Best, A |
22 January 2010, 07:24 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: DFW
Posts: 364
|
|
22 January 2010, 08:02 AM | #15 | |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
Quote:
FLUTED bezels are ONLY available in WG, YG or RG.........never in steel. JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
|
22 January 2010, 10:50 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Wayne
Location: Ventura County CA
Watch: TT DateJust 16013
Posts: 428
|
Oh boy, I get to show it off again.
Here is a TT DJ 16013 with the 3035 movement and acrylic crystal purchased in 1987 right before the switch over to the 3135 movement and sapphire crystal.
__________________
Rolex DateJust 16013 Omega Railmaster 2503.52 |
22 January 2010, 10:58 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Fort Myers, FL
Watch: Rolex Deepsea
Posts: 8,726
|
you "TRF" are so well informed! It's a pleasure reading and learning. Thanks!!!
__________________
Rolex SS Blk Sub-C V-Series Rolex TT Blk Sub-C V-Series Rolex Sub 14060M V-Series Rolex Explorer II White V-Series Rolex Yachtmaster SS M-Series |
22 January 2010, 09:27 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Nat Parkinson
Location: Maine, USA
Watch: me pull a rabbit..
Posts: 1,196
|
This is easy.
16233
- 16013 220
__________________
When the alien spaceships actually landed, to everyone's surprise, it turned out that the world's governments had not been hiding anything. They were just as clueless as the rest of us! |
23 January 2010, 12:34 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Peter
Location: Massachusetts
Watch: 214270 Mk2
Posts: 1,963
|
Denver Dick:
Is that the original box that came with your TT in 1987? Just asking because I bought the same box set to go with my 1987 16030.
__________________
2016 Explorer 214270 Mk2 - 1996 Submariner 14060* - 1972 Datejust 1601 1972 Oyster Perpetual 1002 - 1978 Oysterquartz 17000 Omega Seamaster 2265.80 - Omega Seamaster 300 166.0324 *RIP PAL 1942-2015 |
23 January 2010, 12:39 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 969
|
Right
|
23 January 2010, 12:52 AM | #21 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: DFW
Posts: 364
|
Quote:
I find it funny that the swiss don't know how to count in roman. They use IIII for 4 instead of IV. |
|
23 January 2010, 12:54 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Dave
Location: Australia
Watch: DJ16233TT
Posts: 18,485
|
Just following on from Wayne, here is my 94 S serial 16233 and accessories.
__________________
Apprentice to Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.