ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
6 February 2010, 10:40 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NYC
Watch: ya mawt!
Posts: 3,448
|
Show us your Explorer II 16570 Cream?
|
6 February 2010, 02:15 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Jib
Location: SJ, California
Watch: sun dial
Posts: 8,189
|
I thought only the 16550 dial faded?
With 16570s all I've seen are faded indices on the early ones. |
6 February 2010, 02:23 PM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NYC
Watch: ya mawt!
Posts: 3,448
|
|
6 February 2010, 02:44 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Jib
Location: SJ, California
Watch: sun dial
Posts: 8,189
|
|
6 February 2010, 02:57 PM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Pav
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 11,495
|
Nice looking watch Ben....
Can you explain the controversy about these pieces?? |
6 February 2010, 02:59 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Jim
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,188
|
Nice example, Ben. Looks good!
__________________
My collection, in order of acquisition: 16610 Sub (Z serial) 16710 GMT-Master II (Coke and Pepsi) (Z serial) 16570 Explorer II (White) (F serial) 116660 Deepsea (V serial) 79270 Tudor Tiger Chrono (red dial) |
7 February 2010, 12:41 AM | #7 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NYC
Watch: ya mawt!
Posts: 3,448
|
Quote:
I hope this helps, as it can sound confusing. |
|
7 February 2010, 01:28 AM | #8 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Pav
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 11,495
|
Quote:
I have a 16550 with SCOC just like yours.... called a non- rail dial configuration. |
|
7 February 2010, 01:59 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: GMT+1
Posts: 2,711
|
Two fine Explorers! Thanks for posting. I wouldn't mind adding a 16550 to my collection; black or white...
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.