ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

bayerische · 19 February 2010, 02:09 AM

Hi guys.

I wisited my dealer today, as I forgot the Submariner booklet there last week when I got the LV.

He mentioned he would be getting a Ceramic GMT master soon, LNIB 10 days old!

I feel somewhat tempted to flip the Fat lady 16760 GMT master 2 that I have for the Ceramic GMT...

I shouldn't, because I just received bezel inserts from "Greekbum" and left the watch to have the sapphire changed today (because of a 1mm crack on the edge of the glass). So I have spent about 400 euros on the watch these two weeks...

Should you flip? I'm sitting on a wonderful 1988 R-serial Fat lady.

DWdrummer · 19 February 2010, 02:11 AM

I personally wouldn't. If only for the fact the GMT IIc while beautiful in its own right is a current production model.

The Fat Lady will never be made again. I would keep it and save up for the GMT IIc if it were my choice.

ersnyder · 19 February 2010, 02:13 AM

Keep the 88 and save up for the IIc.

ParisDakarBmw · 19 February 2010, 02:15 AM

Keep the 16760, and save up for the other.

Ozzie · 19 February 2010, 02:45 AM

Don't do it!

2005rivers · 19 February 2010, 02:48 AM

I agree with above, keep it, and save for gmt iic(It is an awsome watch)

sakuraba · 19 February 2010, 02:51 AM

I wouldn't do it!

Dr.B · 19 February 2010, 02:52 AM

Get what you like.

bayerische · 19 February 2010, 03:10 AM

Some good advise. Hmmm, Well I guess I have to check if the Ceramic sings to me... Best would be to keep both, but I'm having a hard time explaining these things to my wife...

even though me buying a watch doesn't interfere in anyway with our life.

sea-dweller · 19 February 2010, 03:11 AM

I wouldn't. I would keep the 16760 and also buy the GMT II C...

gmh1013 · 19 February 2010, 04:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2005rivers

I agree with above, keep it, and save for gmt iic(It is an awsome watch)

The new model does not blow my skirt up and I would never trade my Pepsi for one

1000ftSub · 19 February 2010, 04:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ersnyder

Keep the 88 and save up for the IIc.

indeed

JUSTROLEXES · 19 February 2010, 04:22 AM

Do Not do it.. you can always get the Ceramic later

Woody · 19 February 2010, 04:38 AM

I would go for the GMTII-C - great watch

mpkRolex · 19 February 2010, 04:57 AM

I would keep the 88 and consider buying the IIC if I could afford..

bounce · 19 February 2010, 04:58 AM

I have owned the GMT IIc, nice watch but I would not flip the Fat Lady for it.

Gerardus · 19 February 2010, 05:19 AM

Take the GMT2C.

karmatp · 19 February 2010, 08:08 AM

Don't even think about it, keep that classic.

bayerische · 19 February 2010, 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bayerische

I shouldn't, because I just received bezel inserts from "Greekbum"

Quoting myself, as i mixed "Greekbum" and "Tempoking".

I bought the bezel inserts from "Tempoking", not "Greekbum". Sorry for the mistake.

gmtobsessed · 19 February 2010, 08:45 AM

Nah, keep the fat lady!

19 February 2010, 02:09 AM	#1
bayerische "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Andreas Location: Margaritaville Watch: Smurf Posts: 19,879	Would you flip? Hi guys. I wisited my dealer today, as I forgot the Submariner booklet there last week when I got the LV. He mentioned he would be getting a Ceramic GMT master soon, LNIB 10 days old! I feel somewhat tempted to flip the Fat lady 16760 GMT master 2 that I have for the Ceramic GMT... I shouldn't, because I just received bezel inserts from "Greekbum" and left the watch to have the sapphire changed today (because of a 1mm crack on the edge of the glass). So I have spent about 400 euros on the watch these two weeks... Should you flip? I'm sitting on a wonderful 1988 R-serial Fat lady.

19 February 2010, 02:45 AM	#5
Ozzie "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: London UK Watch: Daytona 116520 WD Posts: 143	Don't do it! __________________ Daytona 116520 WD GMT Pepsi 16700 Sea Dweller 16600 Sub Date 16610 Panerai PAM 111

19 February 2010, 02:51 AM	#7
sakuraba "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Real Name: Jib Location: SJ, California Watch: sun dial Posts: 8,189	I wouldn't do it! __________________ F 14000 AirKing black F 16710 GMT Pepsi F 16570 Explorer II white T 16600 SD D 16610 LV "fine quality is remembered long after the pain of spending money" -Steve Mulholland

19 February 2010, 02:52 AM	#8
Dr.B "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Real Name: Fernando Location: North Carolina Watch: SS White Daytona Posts: 1,944	Get what you like. __________________ The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new lands but seeing with new eyes. —Marcel Proust

19 February 2010, 03:11 AM	#10
sea-dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Dennis Location: Bay Area - 925 Posts: 40,018	I wouldn't. I would keep the 16760 and also buy the GMT II C... __________________ TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007)

19 February 2010, 02:11 AM	#2
DWdrummer Banned Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Florida USA Posts: 954	I personally wouldn't. If only for the fact the GMT IIc while beautiful in its own right is a current production model. The Fat Lady will never be made again. I would keep it and save up for the GMT IIc if it were my choice.

19 February 2010, 02:13 AM	#3
ersnyder 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Eric Location: Long Beach CA USA Watch: Rolex Explorer II Posts: 4,102	Keep the 88 and save up for the IIc.

19 February 2010, 02:15 AM	#4
ParisDakarBmw Banned Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Paul Location: New Haven, CT Watch: 116610 Sub-C Posts: 6,552	Keep the 16760, and save up for the other.

19 February 2010, 02:48 AM	#6
2005rivers Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: texas Watch: GMT Master IIc Posts: 545	I agree with above, keep it, and save for gmt iic(It is an awsome watch)

19 February 2010, 03:10 AM	#9
bayerische "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Andreas Location: Margaritaville Watch: Smurf Posts: 19,879	Some good advise. Hmmm, Well I guess I have to check if the Ceramic sings to me... Best would be to keep both, but I'm having a hard time explaining these things to my wife... even though me buying a watch doesn't interfere in anyway with our life.

19 February 2010, 04:22 AM	#13
JUSTROLEXES ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 2024 SubLV41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Tony Geha Location: San Diego, CA Watch: Yacht-Master Posts: 51,134	Do Not do it.. you can always get the Ceramic later __________________ Instagram @JustRolexes 2FA security active

19 February 2010, 04:38 AM	#14
Woody "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Africa Posts: 1,127	I would go for the GMTII-C - great watch

19 February 2010, 04:57 AM	#15
mpkRolex 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: USA Watch: Pepsi Posts: 2,180	I would keep the 88 and consider buying the IIC if I could afford.. __________________ Rest in peace JJ! http://www.rolexforums.com/showthrea...light=JJ+irani "Rolex is highly addictive. Please shop responsibly"

19 February 2010, 04:58 AM	#16
bounce Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: kent Posts: 234	I have owned the GMT IIc, nice watch but I would not flip the Fat Lady for it.

19 February 2010, 05:19 AM	#17
Gerardus "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: Gerardus Location: often in the air Watch: ♕ Posts: 12,148	Take the GMT2C. __________________ ♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300

19 February 2010, 08:08 AM	#18
karmatp "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Real Name: Trevor Location: Arizona Posts: 5,740	Don't even think about it, keep that classic. __________________ My grails:

19 February 2010, 08:45 AM	#20
gmtobsessed "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Indonesia Posts: 1,374	Nah, keep the fat lady!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 4 (0 members and 4 guests)