ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

JediRolex · 21 March 2010, 05:31 PM

I love the looks of the new 39!!!!

With the exception of one detail!

Dr. Jones · 21 March 2010, 05:40 PM

I will have to wait and see the new one in the flesh. I can't make up my mind based upon the photos.

TimeOnHand · 21 March 2010, 05:56 PM

I like the 36mm Explorer.

The new one just doesn't look right due to the fact if has small hands!

Roxas · 21 March 2010, 07:45 PM

I prefer the 39 mm except its short hands.

Deyn Man · 21 March 2010, 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JediRolex

I love the looks of the new 39!!!!

With the exception of one detail!

same here!!!

RogerF · 21 March 2010, 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JediRolex

I love the looks of the new 39!!!!

With the exception of one detail!

Gerardus · 21 March 2010, 10:10 PM

New one, they should have made the DJ2 also this size......

rolexcd · 21 March 2010, 10:41 PM

Will definitely get the new one as well as I think 39mm would like bigger than the existing one. I consider that 36mm is a little bit too small compared with other sport models.

snow_rocks · 21 March 2010, 10:46 PM

The one I own already, with the engraved flange (rehaut), which is now gonna be rarer!

Poom · 21 March 2010, 11:18 PM

The 36mm is actually so nice in its shape, anyone has a chance to own it, you will love it. Just pick one today, I love it.

TheDude · 21 March 2010, 11:35 PM

I personally like the very old 1016 style, but the new 214270 is awesome.

Rolex is lucky it didn't have Internet forums to contend with back in 1989 when the 1016 was replaced by the 14270.

I will be adding a 39mm Explorer to my 39mm 1016 Homage, the MkII Vantage.

andy102 · 22 March 2010, 12:39 AM

36mm with out a doubt, I like my T-Swiss dial to much.

carlhaluss · 22 March 2010, 02:07 AM

Well, I can't see it getting any better for me than my 36mm.
Although the 39mm isn't available yet, I think that Rolex made a good move. I believe it will make the model more popular. Have to see it for real to decide. One of the things I like about the 36mm model, is the nice wide lug width at 20mm, which is quite wide for a watch this size. That gives it the proporitions I really like. I am wondering if the lug width on the 39mm will stay the same. I think 20mm is the max lug width for any Rolex?
I am curious to see how the hands look for real, as I have heard complaints about them being too small. Does that mean they kept the same hands as the 36mm, or made the hands smaller, or made them bigger but not big enough? I can't really see by just looking at the pics, to be honest.
Paid a visit to my Rolex AD yesterday. Also my favourite AD. When they heard that the Explorer 36mm was to be changed, they grabbed the last ones from Rolex that they could get hold of. I was lucky that I got mine in Feb as I got a 20% discount. Now they will only sell the watch for full price, no discount even with cash. I don't know if other AD's will follow suit, but maybe this is a good indication that the 36mm model will at the very least hold it's value.
I am really looking forward to viewing the 39mm model, I guess at least 3 or 4 months away. I would like to see the proportions and also the dial and the new all white gold numerals. I am also wondering what the price will be, given the upgrade of the movement and the bracelet to the oyster with Easylink.
If I had neither a Milgauss nor an Explorer, and couldn't decide between the two, I think the new 39mm Explorer would make it an easier choice.
Cheers

,
Carl

kyle L · 22 March 2010, 02:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by carlhaluss

Well, I can't see it getting any better for me than my 36mm.
Although the 39mm isn't available yet, I think that Rolex made a good move. I believe it will make the model more popular. Have to see it for real to decide. One of the things I like about the 36mm model, is the nice wide lug width at 20mm, which is quite wide for a watch this size. That gives it the proporitions I really like. I am wondering if the lug width on the 39mm will stay the same. I think 20mm is the max lug width for any Rolex?
I am curious to see how the hands look for real, as I have heard complaints about them being too small. Does that mean they kept the same hands as the 36mm, or made the hands smaller, or made them bigger but not big enough? I can't really see by just looking at the pics, to be honest.
Paid a visit to my Rolex AD yesterday. Also my favourite AD. When they heard that the Explorer 36mm was to be changed, they grabbed the last ones from Rolex that they could get hold of. I was lucky that I got mine in Feb as I got a 20% discount. Now they will only sell the watch for full price, no discount even with cash. I don't know if other AD's will follow suit, but maybe this is a good indication that the 36mm model will at the very least hold it's value.
I am really looking forward to viewing the 39mm model, I guess at least 3 or 4 months away. I would like to see the proportions and also the dial and the new all white gold numerals. I am also wondering what the price will be, given the upgrade of the movement and the bracelet to the oyster with Easylink.
If I had neither a Milgauss nor an Explorer, and couldn't decide between the two, I think the new 39mm Explorer would make it an easier choice.
Cheers

,
Carl

Good post Carl, I'm interested on how it would look too, but I am sticking with my 36mm.

Roselló · 22 March 2010, 02:45 AM

The new Explorer. I think it will look way better with 39mm.

TheDude · 22 March 2010, 03:35 AM

39mm Explorer homage with 20mm lugs for comparison to some others. The watch on the far right is 42mm with 22mm lugs.

21 March 2010, 05:56 PM	#33
TimeOnHand "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Kevin Location: Hong Kong Watch: Rolex Air-King Posts: 4,468	I like the 36mm Explorer. The new one just doesn't look right due to the fact if has small hands! __________________ Instagram: timeonhand1010

21 March 2010, 10:10 PM	#37
Gerardus "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: Gerardus Location: often in the air Watch: ♕ Posts: 12,142	New one, they should have made the DJ2 also this size...... __________________ ♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300

21 March 2010, 11:18 PM	#40
Poom "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Bangkok, Thailand Posts: 349	The 36mm is actually so nice in its shape, anyone has a chance to own it, you will love it. Just pick one today, I love it. __________________ Watch is all around! I love the crown of achievement!

22 March 2010, 02:07 AM	#43
carlhaluss "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Carl Location: Vancouver, Canada Watch: Rolex Explorer 1 Posts: 1,780	Well, I can't see it getting any better for me than my 36mm. Although the 39mm isn't available yet, I think that Rolex made a good move. I believe it will make the model more popular. Have to see it for real to decide. One of the things I like about the 36mm model, is the nice wide lug width at 20mm, which is quite wide for a watch this size. That gives it the proporitions I really like. I am wondering if the lug width on the 39mm will stay the same. I think 20mm is the max lug width for any Rolex? I am curious to see how the hands look for real, as I have heard complaints about them being too small. Does that mean they kept the same hands as the 36mm, or made the hands smaller, or made them bigger but not big enough? I can't really see by just looking at the pics, to be honest. Paid a visit to my Rolex AD yesterday. Also my favourite AD. When they heard that the Explorer 36mm was to be changed, they grabbed the last ones from Rolex that they could get hold of. I was lucky that I got mine in Feb as I got a 20% discount. Now they will only sell the watch for full price, no discount even with cash. I don't know if other AD's will follow suit, but maybe this is a good indication that the 36mm model will at the very least hold it's value. I am really looking forward to viewing the 39mm model, I guess at least 3 or 4 months away. I would like to see the proportions and also the dial and the new all white gold numerals. I am also wondering what the price will be, given the upgrade of the movement and the bracelet to the oyster with Easylink. If I had neither a Milgauss nor an Explorer, and couldn't decide between the two, I think the new 39mm Explorer would make it an easier choice. Cheers , Carl __________________ Those who possess a sense of entitlement are seldom satisfied.

21 March 2010, 05:31 PM	#31
JediRolex "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Real Name: Derek Location: Chicago Watch: 114060 Posts: 447	I love the looks of the new 39!!!! With the exception of one detail!

21 March 2010, 05:40 PM	#32
Dr. Jones Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: Jack Location: Boise Watch: LV Sub, GMT IIC Posts: 122	I will have to wait and see the new one in the flesh. I can't make up my mind based upon the photos.

21 March 2010, 07:45 PM	#34
Roxas "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Earth Watch: 14060M Posts: 516	I prefer the 39 mm except its short hands.

21 March 2010, 10:41 PM	#38
rolexcd Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Anthony Location: China / Australia Watch: Daytona SS Black D Posts: 318	Will definitely get the new one as well as I think 39mm would like bigger than the existing one. I consider that 36mm is a little bit too small compared with other sport models.

21 March 2010, 10:46 PM	#39
snow_rocks Banned Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Rick Location: At what TIME?!!! Watch: the SKY tonite! Posts: 3,225	The one I own already, with the engraved flange (rehaut), which is now gonna be rarer!

21 March 2010, 11:35 PM	#41
TheDude "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: DC Area, USA Watch: IIc,1680 Red,16660 Posts: 4,492	I personally like the very old 1016 style, but the new 214270 is awesome. Rolex is lucky it didn't have Internet forums to contend with back in 1989 when the 1016 was replaced by the 14270. I will be adding a 39mm Explorer to my 39mm 1016 Homage, the MkII Vantage.

22 March 2010, 12:39 AM	#42
andy102 Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Sussex, UK Posts: 43	36mm with out a doubt, I like my T-Swiss dial to much.

22 March 2010, 02:45 AM	#45
Roselló "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: SA, Texas. Watch: * { SD & DJ } * Posts: 943	The new Explorer. I think it will look way better with 39mm.

22 March 2010, 03:35 AM	#46
TheDude "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: DC Area, USA Watch: IIc,1680 Red,16660 Posts: 4,492	39mm Explorer homage with 20mm lugs for comparison to some others. The watch on the far right is 42mm with 22mm lugs.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)