ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

mcjp6 · 25 April 2010, 08:30 PM

the date mag that is??

seller the-righteous-one ( 175 )

Rolex Oyster Perpetual Date Explorer II

Model 16570

Serial F977152

This Rolex is 100% Genuine

I don't have any papers or box with this watch.

Everything is working fine

There are a few small dents and scracthes around the watch casing which some of them are in the photographs

There are 2 marks on the face, one between the 7-8 and the other one around the hands in the middle of the face. You can see them in the photos.

I can't any scratches on the glass.

Any other questions please don't hesitate to ask.

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Rolex-Oyster-P...item4ceeffb263

idk01 · 25 April 2010, 08:33 PM

For an F 2006 serial, that don't look right :-) That is not the original crystal, looks like an acrylic to me, unless he has mucked up the serial somewhere

idk01 · 25 April 2010, 08:36 PM

Just another note - I'm now saying fake, Hour hand should be below the 24H hand on the hand stack :-)

Disregard that :-)

having one of those nights :-) the stack is correct on that one

BASSETHOUNDS · 25 April 2010, 08:51 PM

I certainly doesn't feel right . Glass could be aftermarket . Clasp code is consistent with late F serial . Just note the drop of the last digit (2) on the serial . Strange to see such a irregularity of the serial on relative young Rolex watches .

mcjp6 · 25 April 2010, 08:54 PM

I am probably wrong, I just thought the date mag was too small, on others the date appears to be the same size as numbers on the bezel, on this one it appears to me to be smaller.

Jackxv · 25 April 2010, 09:06 PM

IMO it's real.

Crown fits nice to the case.

My Exp2 has the same crazy serial engraving.

Jack

mborner · 25 April 2010, 10:42 PM

I say it's real. Here's why.

the guy took some very good, clear, close up shots of the watch, so he's confident in the authenticity. Also, there's no SOB story on where the watch came from, like a dead Uncle or a gift he didn't want. He didn't pick it up at an estate sale. For those reasons alone it looks legit. If it is fake, the seller, himself, doesn't know it.

25 April 2010, 08:30 PM	#1
mcjp6 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Michael Location: VK2 - AUS Watch: 5513s Posts: 7,380	Does this look right? the date mag that is?? seller the-righteous-one ( 175 ) Rolex Oyster Perpetual Date Explorer II Model 16570 Serial F977152 This Rolex is 100% Genuine I don't have any papers or box with this watch. Everything is working fine There are a few small dents and scracthes around the watch casing which some of them are in the photographs There are 2 marks on the face, one between the 7-8 and the other one around the hands in the middle of the face. You can see them in the photos. I can't any scratches on the glass. Any other questions please don't hesitate to ask. http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Rolex-Oyster-P...item4ceeffb263 Attached Images

25 April 2010, 08:33 PM	#2
idk01 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Dave Location: Australia Watch: DJ16233TT Posts: 18,485	For an F 2006 serial, that don't look right :-) That is not the original crystal, looks like an acrylic to me, unless he has mucked up the serial somewhere __________________ *Apprentice to Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth*

25 April 2010, 08:36 PM	#3
idk01 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Dave Location: Australia Watch: DJ16233TT Posts: 18,485	Just another note - I'm now saying fake, Hour hand should be below the 24H hand on the hand stack :-) Disregard that :-) having one of those nights :-) the stack is correct on that one __________________ *Apprentice to Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth*

25 April 2010, 09:06 PM	#6
Jackxv "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Netherlands Posts: 969	Real IMO it's real. Crown fits nice to the case. My Exp2 has the same crazy serial engraving. Jack

25 April 2010, 08:51 PM	#4
BASSETHOUNDS Banned Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Tristan Location: GIRONA , SPAIN Watch: 116520/660/710/334 Posts: 7,147	I certainly doesn't feel right . Glass could be aftermarket . Clasp code is consistent with late F serial . Just note the drop of the last digit (2) on the serial . Strange to see such a irregularity of the serial on relative young Rolex watches .

25 April 2010, 08:54 PM	#5
mcjp6 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Michael Location: VK2 - AUS Watch: 5513s Posts: 7,380	I am probably wrong, I just thought the date mag was too small, on others the date appears to be the same size as numbers on the bezel, on this one it appears to me to be smaller.

25 April 2010, 10:42 PM	#7
mborner "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: Coral Springs, Fl Posts: 99	I say it's real. Here's why. the guy took some very good, clear, close up shots of the watch, so he's confident in the authenticity. Also, there's no SOB story on where the watch came from, like a dead Uncle or a gift he didn't want. He didn't pick it up at an estate sale. For those reasons alone it looks legit. If it is fake, the seller, himself, doesn't know it.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)