The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17 May 2010, 04:42 AM   #1
JToddH
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Todd
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 40
Daytona's static "second" hand?

I was told my ARD that the stopwatch hand should remain static on the Daytona and only engaged when used as a stopwatch. While I realize the true second hand is at the six o'clock position, are there pros and cons to leaving the larger "second/stopwatch engaged"?
I've twice had people point out that my "second hand" was broken because it wasn't moving and one thought it was the sign of a fake. WOAH! I'm not real crazy about trying to defend my watch as authentic.
JToddH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 May 2010, 04:45 AM   #2
Mockingbird
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: --
Posts: 2,097
When you need to time something use it, if not keep it still. It's basically just a device used for timing and finding unit rates so use it as you see fit!
Mockingbird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 May 2010, 04:58 AM   #3
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by JToddH View Post
I was told my ARD that the stopwatch hand should remain static on the Daytona and only engaged when used as a stopwatch. While I realize the true second hand is at the six o'clock position, are there pros and cons to leaving the larger "second/stopwatch engaged"?
I've twice had people point out that my "second hand" was broken because it wasn't moving and one thought it was the sign of a fake. WOAH! I'm not real crazy about trying to defend my watch as authentic.
Why worry what others think you know yours is real,and its best to use the crono function when needed.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17 May 2010, 05:08 AM   #4
The GMT Master
"TRF" Member
 
The GMT Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by JToddH View Post
I was told my ARD that the stopwatch hand should remain static on the Daytona and only engaged when used as a stopwatch. While I realize the true second hand is at the six o'clock position, are there pros and cons to leaving the larger "second/stopwatch engaged"?
I've twice had people point out that my "second hand" was broken because it wasn't moving and one thought it was the sign of a fake. WOAH! I'm not real crazy about trying to defend my watch as authentic.
If people don't understand the basic principles of a chronograph function, then why are you getting worried about it? If anything, if the chrono hand can't be stopped, it's a sign of a fake. As for running it all the time, it can be done, although it will impact on the power reserve, and, in theory at least, increase wear and tear on the movement.

Just wear it how you want it - it's your watch at the end of the day
The GMT Master is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 May 2010, 05:28 AM   #5
Speed
"TRF" Member
 
Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
I am with Chris & Padi...

Funny. When I had my Speedy Pro, I often wanted to just let the chrono hand run...but did not want to run the watch down unnecessarily / have to wind it and put more wear and tear on it.

The foregoing leads me to believe I cannot really justify a Daytona - other than for cosmetic reasons. I would hardly ever use the chrono function. At least with the Omega, the pushers did not require unscrewing. You really have to want to deal with this to use the Daytona as intended...
Speed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 May 2010, 07:27 AM   #6
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
I've worn Chronographs for more than 4 decades off and on. I got over people telling me my watch had stopped or was broken years ago............

There are a couple of spots in a chronograph timing complication that are not oiled such as the sub-dial counters; so you may see extra wear on those parts if it is on all the time.. Also, in Physics (it's the law), you don't get something for nothing, so the additional work that the timer is doing will reduce the amplitude slightly and the watch will run faster and deplete power reserve quicker... The watch actually does more work - like you running everywhere you go instead of walking sometimes..

But, these are slight trade-offs if wearing and using the watch the way that you want is compromised. If you like it, do it...

There is nothing terrible that will happen to the watch and any additional slight wear is easily taken care of at service time.............
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 May 2010, 01:20 PM   #7
JToddH
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Todd
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 40
Good feedback everyone. Bottom line is that I love my Daytona. I really just wondered if there was a negative impact on leaving the hand running. Bottom line is that it's not meant to leave running, that's what I needed to know and you all made it clear for me. You're all right about what others think...kinda funny actually, if people get bent out of shape on a Daytona, I'd say they have bigger issues.

Thanks All!
JToddH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 May 2010, 01:23 PM   #8
Dan Pierce
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan Pierce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,215
Spot on, Todd.
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668
Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band
Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation
The Crown & Shield Club
Honorary Member of P-Club
Dan Pierce is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2010, 02:00 AM   #9
chris russell
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Peterborough, ON
Watch: your mouth.
Posts: 1,023
Most chronos have a set of triangular teeth that are thrown or 'crashed' together...

to start the timer. The teeth are triangular to minimize the possibility of the teeth meeting point-to-point when engaged. This naturally is not the best for wear if the chrono is left running continuously. Along with a few other chronos, (Blancpain, Seiko), the Daytona has vertical clutches to engage the chrono function, so no crashing gears, not triangular teeth to grind each other. The change in amplitude and autonomy are minimal in the Daytona when the chrono is running, so feel free to leave it running. It won't materially change the interval between services or the accuracy.
chris russell is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.