ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
13 June 2010, 10:49 AM | #91 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: Beverly Hills
Watch: Rolex/Cartier/FM
Posts: 122
|
Style is evolving and heavily influenced by cultural icons. Actors, politicians and celebrities (be it fashion designers, socialites or gasp - reality stars) are the greatest influencers of style and set the new standards. A lady may recognize the formal individual, but 10 to 1 she will be visualizing James Bond in his tux and Sub when she orgasims.
James Bond may have been uncouth in the 60s, but now he represents the epitomy of style and class. Bottom line - some rules are meant to be broken and once accepted they become the new standard. Imagine Paris without the Eiffel Tower (it was abhorred by the Parisians when first constructed). REMEMBER - "Only those who attempt the absurd will acheive the impossible" - Albert Einstein The real scary subject we should be discussing is plastic surgery - every woman wants Angelina Jolie's lips - talk about some ridiculous looks... |
13 June 2010, 09:39 PM | #92 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Dick
Location: USA
Watch: SubND,DD,SSDaytona
Posts: 2,257
|
Quote:
__________________
“The only reason for time ....................... is so that everything doesn't happen at once." Albert Einstein |
|
14 June 2010, 02:31 AM | #93 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Northern NJ
Watch: Tiffany blue Sub
Posts: 244
|
If I'm in a business meeting I don't see anyone wearing a sport watch with a suit. Because it looks ridiculous. That's why they're called 'dress' and 'sport' watches. If people don't get it, or choose to ignore it, they should be prepared to be thought ill-dressed. Of course the ones that don't get it are clueless anyway, and the ones that ignore it don't care so it's all good!
|
14 June 2010, 05:51 AM | #94 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Dan
Location: Essex, UK
Watch: West Ham! COYI!!
Posts: 7,941
|
Quote:
__________________
Onwards & Upwards Rodders...... Onwards & Upwards. Life is not about how fast you can run or how high you can climb........... It's about how well you can bounce!! TRF HALL OF FAME JANUARY 2010 |
|
14 June 2010, 06:23 AM | #95 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John
Location: Washington
Watch: 16710, 16610, DJ
Posts: 7,329
|
Quote:
|
|
14 June 2010, 06:26 AM | #96 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John
Location: Washington
Watch: 16710, 16610, DJ
Posts: 7,329
|
Quote:
|
|
14 June 2010, 06:28 AM | #97 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John
Location: Washington
Watch: 16710, 16610, DJ
Posts: 7,329
|
|
22 June 2010, 06:10 PM | #98 |
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Philippines
Posts: 650
|
Asian viewpoint... I think many of you will notice that plenty of dressy Citizen's and Seiko's have steel bracelets. It Asia, because of the heat and moisture, wearing a fine leather strap with our business attire is often not feasible from a durability standpoint.
|
27 June 2010, 09:56 AM | #99 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: usa
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 6,962
|
I personally don't wear a sport watch with a suit. However, the chivalry remark is foolish, as fashion and chivalry are unrelated. Fashions do change and what is acceptable in LA may not fly in NYC, etc etc. Beyond that, it think it is much more ridiculous to wear a dress watch with flip flops than a sub with a suit. Some purists I've encountered claim that any complication (even a second hand) is inappropriate for a dress watch. On that note I disagree and realize the whole discussion is subjective anyway. However, if I want to know if someone is a gentleman, I'll wait for him to open his mouth...
Collecting dress watches is fun, but if there ever was a single watch that does all well, it's the Datejust. My DJ seems to match a much broader range of clothes than any other watch I own... |
27 June 2010, 03:03 PM | #100 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 741
|
|
27 June 2010, 06:55 PM | #101 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 741
|
In answer to your question ‘Is chivalry comatose’ – the short answer is it has experienced a well-deserved death. Also, if I understand the word, it also references courage and code of integrity and honour, not easily swayed by ‘fashionable’ court etiquette. It is very clear from this type of thread that there is a quite a mix of Rolex fans with dramatically different tastes.
I am a long time fan of Subs because: a/ I like a rugged, well constructed watch that will last for decades and offer reliable accurate timekeeping. I no longer dive, but I like the confidence of knowing that whatever the weather, and wherever I am, dodging a wildebeest stampede in Africa or simply taking a walk along the seashore at night in a winter gale, I can glance at my watch and easily see the correct time. b/ As a designer, I favour clean, un-adorned austere design that performs the product’s ultimate purpose… in this case, clearly conveying what time it is. Therefore the high-contrast, black & white, easy-to glance, no-nonsense sub is for me. When someone says Rolex to me the last thing I think of is some gaudy gold and diamond encrusted jewelry that some favour. c/ I do not like glitzy ‘dress watches’, nor do like the type of events where it is apparently just absolutely mandatory that I wear one, or for that matter, most of the elitist, foo-foo twits I meet at them. Nor do I want a fleet of watches to match every type of social event or activity. d/ I do not wear my Sub because some guy named Roger F. can bounce a fuzzy yellow ball well and endorses it. Nor do I allow some New York fashion-marketing jerk dictate to me what is good (or bad) fashion and how I should dress. e/ I do admit I’m intrigued by the history of the company, it’s culture and a design philosophy that recognizes that really good design is timeless and only incorporates a new technology after it has proven itself in use. I think if you feel that a stainless-steel sub looks clunky and out-of-place and these fashion ‘rules’ are important to you… well vive la difference! Life would certainly be boring if just everybody wore a sub. However, don’t assume that you’ll get too much sympathy in these forums by suggesting a sub & a suit is a fashion faux-pas. And to ‘Art 1’ who suggests I’m embarrassing myself and just don’t know it, - not at all, in fact I’d love to attend your office in my suit & sub… just for your personal amusement. |
27 June 2010, 07:20 PM | #102 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,534
|
Hi Nowzen,
Archie was banned again for this troll thread so don't wind youself up too much mate. Welcome to the Forum.
__________________
E |
27 June 2010, 09:10 PM | #103 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 741
|
Haaa Haaaa
thanx for the heads up... wound up for nothing! I guess it was a theraputic vent. And thanx for the welcome. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.