ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

TARDIS · 19 April 2007, 10:06 PM

or are they just having a laugh?

I read that it has 100 more parts than a Daytona, so you wouldn't want to bump it against the helm!!

btw THANKS JOCKE FOR THIS FANTASTIC PHOTO:

Gedanken · 19 April 2007, 10:31 PM

For God's sake I'm hoping that they're just testing the waters and that the blackened toes have led them to change their minds about releasing this abortion.

President · 19 April 2007, 10:36 PM

Yachty Is just became more expensive...

TARDIS · 19 April 2007, 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gedanken

For God's sake I'm hoping that they're just testing the waters and that the blackened toes have led them to change their minds about releasing this abortion.

Dead right.

Can you picture some yatchie here in OZ with one on his wrist at the club?

I think there would be a few sniggers

Remarks like.. "Hey Wally, can you drink ten schooners in that time?

jac67 · 19 April 2007, 11:00 PM

I think you are all wrong!

Although the new Yachtmaster II is NOT my cup of tea, it IS a watch specifically designed for a specific function/trade.

Again, Rolex has been true to its existance and produced a real "tool watch".

How many people here who own Subs or SD's actually go diving?

Do you really think Rolex would devote so much time, money and effort in producing a watch that nobody wants? I'm sure all their research has been done.

This watch WILL be sold to thousands of yachties ALL over the world, as it performs the very function that these people require.

We, ordinary watch wearers won't buy them, but that's ok, each to their own.

Just my 2 cents worth.

John.

SPACE-DWELLER · 19 April 2007, 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jac67

I think you are all wrong!

Although the new Yachtmaster II is NOT my cup of tea, it IS a watch specifically designed for a specific function/trade.

Again, Rolex has been true to its existance and produced a real "tool watch".

How many people here who own Subs or SD's actually go diving?

Do you really think Rolex would devote so much time, money and effort in producing a watch that nobody wants? I'm sure all their research has been done.

This watch WILL be sold to thousands of yachties ALL over the world, as it performs the very function that these people require.

We, ordinary watch wearers won't buy them, but that's ok, each to their own.

Just my 2 cents worth.

John.

Hi John,

very well observed! In fact you are quite right :-)

So maybe the YMII is not that bad at all. I just hope that Rolex won't make all the watches into bling blings, i.e. polish lugs and centre links of the Sub and Sea-Dweller for example. I think it is good news that Rolex has made a new and quite complex movement and yet another tool watch. It is also nice to see that Rolex makes SOME new design, just as long as it is not carried TOO far, i.e. that the bling bling design is transferred to ALL Rolex watches. Because if THIS is done, Rolex will not be as we knew it. In that case, you might as well buy a Breitling

With kind regards,

Bo.

Gedanken · 19 April 2007, 11:32 PM

John, I agree with you about the functionality of the YM2 - in that department, for sure it's an improvement over the blinged-out Sub that preceded it, and on the basis of its yachting-related functionality I'd say that it has a place in the tool-watch line.

I just wish it wasn't so damned ugly. Surely they could have dressed that nice new movement up better? The bezel's redundant because there's already the 10-to-1 scale on the dial, and that redundancy works against its place in the tool-watch line. A tachymeter would have been more useful instead of that "look at me - I'm a YACHT-MASTER II!" doughnut. Also, being intended to be on the water, one would think that the classic screw-down pushers would have more place on a YM2 than on a Daytona, yet it's the other way round.

Lol-x · 19 April 2007, 11:44 PM

Yes, Rolex has released a number of new models this year to hopefully cater for everyones tastes and preferences.
Fortunately, Rolex didn't give the GMTII polished lugs

But I am honestly surprised by the release of the YMII as being the type of watch that the consumer needs or demands. Time will tell.
Also the Milgauss was a commercial failure in the 1980's so it will be interesting to see how it goes.
Rolex doesn't need to make a profit, I'd love to hear what goes on in their HQ about decisions on releasing new models.
It seems the new GMTII is going to be US$6000+ which is quite a lot, as for the YMII, I don't intend taking out a second mortgage.

Mr. K · 19 April 2007, 11:57 PM

I hear the movement in this new YM is a work of art, but really only appreciated by those who will use it.

BTW that is not me.

I can see it not looking so bad if they had it in SS w/ a black bezel. or even a PT bezel like the YMI

In the circle I hang out with.

: But in boating circles it may just be

20 April 2007, 01:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jac67

Again, Rolex has been true to its existance and produced a real "tool watch".

I agree - I suspect many "tools" will be wearing the YMII.

cbrenthus · 20 April 2007, 02:12 AM

Like many, I think the bezel really kills it. I think they should have done a reverse 60 second non-rotatable bezel. It would look much better and countdown the seconds to the next minute. The one they have now seems kind of redundant.

nko51 · 20 April 2007, 02:36 AM

What does the 0 - 10 half dial read or represent?

Solo118 · 20 April 2007, 02:50 AM

Ok so noone here will use it, Lets just assume those who will buy it and use it would love it. Rolex will still manage to sell every piece believe it or not (just like every other model)
There are lots of other tool watches nobody uses but we think of them as fashion devices, This on the other hand is no fashion piece so I hope those that wear it know what they are doing.

ohlins · 20 April 2007, 02:58 AM

ha it can still be worn as a fashion piece.....

cbrenthus · 20 April 2007, 03:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nko51

What does the 0 - 10 half dial read or represent?

It represents the countdown from 10 minutes. I think it has something to do with how they start a yachting race.

JJ Irani · 20 April 2007, 04:25 AM

It's that bloody horse-shoe with the 0~10 on the dial that's put me off this watch!!

Welshwatchman · 20 April 2007, 05:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jac67

I think you are all wrong!

Although the new Yachtmaster II is NOT my cup of tea, it IS a watch specifically designed for a specific function/trade.

Again, Rolex has been true to its existance and produced a real "tool watch".

How many people here who own Subs or SD's actually go diving?

Do you really think Rolex would devote so much time, money and effort in producing a watch that nobody wants? I'm sure all their research has been done.

This watch WILL be sold to thousands of yachties ALL over the world, as it performs the very function that these people require.

We, ordinary watch wearers won't buy them, but that's ok, each to their own.

Just my 2 cents worth.

John.

There is one flaw to your logic.

A proper tool watch would be offered in stainless steel.

Blue Bull · 20 April 2007, 05:59 AM

They should call it the YACHTDISASTER-II or perhaps for the sake of simplicity,how about ... TITANIC-II ??

It remains a pathetic design....

Chris B · 20 April 2007, 06:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blue Bull

They should call it the YACHTDISASTER-II or perhaps for the sake of simplicity,how about ... TITANIC-II ??

There's been some great quotes in TRF lately,

warbird · 20 April 2007, 09:43 AM

"it's just dreadfully awful"

montecristo · 20 April 2007, 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TARDIS

or are they just having a laugh?

I read that it has 100 more parts than a Daytona, so you wouldn't want to bump it against the helm!!

btw THANKS JOCKE FOR THIS FANTASTIC PHOTO:

Reminds me of GerardoG's Swatch, instead his swatch is actually cool and this YMII is simply retarded in my opinion.

Mrdi · 20 April 2007, 11:18 AM

YM2
Functionally correct
A proper tool
Just like Comex
Well almost, ...
too bad it had to be compromised with a BlInG factor.
The cost of the YM2 is about the same as the cost of a new mainsail
on a sled.

Mrdi · 20 April 2007, 11:48 AM

YM2
Functionally correct
A proper tool
Just like Comex
Well almost, ...
too bad it had to be compromised with a BlInG factor.
The cost of the YM2 is about the same as the cost of a new mainsail
on a sled.

syahriltaher · 20 April 2007, 12:04 PM

Guys,

I think we have to start accepting the reality. Rolex are going to launch the YMII real soon...If you check their website, they've put the YMII there already...It indicates that they're serious about it...

The good point is maybe for those who already own the current YM (like I do), can expect appreciation of value....may be just like the vintage orange hand explorer II...hehehe...

Best Regards,

leopardprey · 20 April 2007, 12:38 PM

It would look much better without YachtMaster on the Bezel!!!

jac67 · 20 April 2007, 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Avalon

I agree - I suspect many "tools" will be wearing the YMII.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Welshwatchman

There is one flaw to your logic.

A proper tool watch would be offered in stainless steel.

True. But people who own and sail these (high end) yachts are, let's say, a little out there!

I have met a few yachties. They are a little flashy (cars, clothes & jewellry).

So I think the new YMII is PERFECT!

Maybe the YMIII will be "iced out".

Yes ,it's a generalisation, so please don't flame me.

John.

astcell · 20 April 2007, 11:44 PM

When I firat saw it I said "A watch for wearing on a yacht? It *IS* the yacht! It looks like someone melted a box of crayons on a Daytona. Holy moley what a conflaguration. I think the Yacht racing folks will ban the watch unanimously. It truly looks like a semaphore carnivore.

19 April 2007, 10:06 PM	#1
TARDIS "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2005 Real Name: Steve Location: Queensland, AUST Posts: 2,003	Are Rolex Really Serious about YMII...... or are they just having a laugh? I read that it has 100 more parts than a Daytona, so you wouldn't want to bump it against the helm!! btw THANKS JOCKE FOR THIS FANTASTIC PHOTO:

19 April 2007, 10:31 PM	#2
Gedanken "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: Sir Location: Melbourne Watch: F-series SD Posts: 8,589	For God's sake I'm hoping that they're just testing the waters and that the blackened toes have led them to change their minds about releasing this abortion. __________________ You buy a Casio to make sure you're on time; you wear a Rolex because you don't have to be on time.

19 April 2007, 11:32 PM	#7
Gedanken "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: Sir Location: Melbourne Watch: F-series SD Posts: 8,589	John, I agree with you about the functionality of the YM2 - in that department, for sure it's an improvement over the blinged-out Sub that preceded it, and on the basis of its yachting-related functionality I'd say that it has a place in the tool-watch line. I just wish it wasn't so damned ugly. Surely they could have dressed that nice new movement up better? The bezel's redundant because there's already the 10-to-1 scale on the dial, and that redundancy works against its place in the tool-watch line. A tachymeter would have been more useful instead of that "look at me - I'm a YACHT-MASTER II!" doughnut. Also, being intended to be on the water, one would think that the classic screw-down pushers would have more place on a YM2 than on a Daytona, yet it's the other way round. __________________ You buy a Casio to make sure you're on time; you wear a Rolex because you don't have to be on time.

20 April 2007, 02:12 AM	#11
cbrenthus "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Real Name: Brandon Location: FL Watch: ing my second hand Posts: 869	Like many, I think the bezel really kills it. I think they should have done a reverse 60 second non-rotatable bezel. It would look much better and countdown the seconds to the next minute. The one they have now seems kind of redundant. __________________ www.bknicholas.com www.myspace.com/bknicholas

20 April 2007, 02:36 AM	#12
nko51 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Real Name: Alex Location: USA Watch: TT Blue Sub Posts: 2,542	What does the 0 - 10 half dial read or represent? __________________

19 April 2007, 10:36 PM	#3
President Banned Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: M.Thatcher MP Location: Le Locle Watch: Bear Grylls Posts: 2,913	Yachty Is just became more expensive...

19 April 2007, 11:00 PM	#5
jac67 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: John Location: Australia Watch: Me Posts: 1,950	I think you are all wrong! Although the new Yachtmaster II is NOT my cup of tea, it IS a watch specifically designed for a specific function/trade. Again, Rolex has been true to its existance and produced a real "tool watch". How many people here who own Subs or SD's actually go diving? Do you really think Rolex would devote so much time, money and effort in producing a watch that nobody wants? I'm sure all their research has been done. This watch WILL be sold to thousands of yachties ALL over the world, as it performs the very function that these people require. We, ordinary watch wearers won't buy them, but that's ok, each to their own. Just my 2 cents worth. John.

19 April 2007, 11:44 PM	#8
Lol-x Facilitator Join Date: Nov 2005 Real Name: Steve Location: Omnipresent Posts: 33,588	Yes, Rolex has released a number of new models this year to hopefully cater for everyones tastes and preferences. Fortunately, Rolex didn't give the GMTII polished lugs But I am honestly surprised by the release of the YMII as being the type of watch that the consumer needs or demands. Time will tell. Also the Milgauss was a commercial failure in the 1980's so it will be interesting to see how it goes. Rolex doesn't need to make a profit, I'd love to hear what goes on in their HQ about decisions on releasing new models. It seems the new GMTII is going to be US$6000+ which is quite a lot, as for the YMII, I don't intend taking out a second mortgage.

19 April 2007, 11:57 PM	#9
Mr. K "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: Mark Location: Seattle-ish Posts: 6,078	I hear the movement in this new YM is a work of art, but really only appreciated by those who will use it. BTW that is not me. I can see it not looking so bad if they had it in SS w/ a black bezel. or even a PT bezel like the YMI In the circle I hang out with. : But in boating circles it may just be

20 April 2007, 02:50 AM	#13
Solo118 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: USA Watch: Daytona Posts: 6,092	Ok so noone here will use it, Lets just assume those who will buy it and use it would love it. Rolex will still manage to sell every piece believe it or not (just like every other model) There are lots of other tool watches nobody uses but we think of them as fashion devices, This on the other hand is no fashion piece so I hope those that wear it know what they are doing.

20 April 2007, 02:58 AM	#14
ohlins "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Singapore Watch: Rolex Posts: 1,213	ha it can still be worn as a fashion piece..... __________________ the hype is true. a crown for every achievement. visit my audio and watch blog & how to use the rolex comfort link?

20 April 2007, 04:25 AM	#16
JJ Irani Fondly Remembered Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: JJ Location: Auckland, NZ Watch: ALL SOLD!! Posts: 74,319	It's that bloody horse-shoe with the 0~10 on the dial that's put me off this watch!! __________________ Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!

20 April 2007, 05:59 AM	#18
Blue Bull Banned Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 2,887	They should call it the YACHTDISASTER-II or perhaps for the sake of simplicity,how about ... TITANIC-II ?? It remains a pathetic design....

20 April 2007, 09:43 AM	#20
warbird Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Virginia Posts: 23	to quote a phrase from Simon Cowell "it's just dreadfully awful"

20 April 2007, 11:18 AM	#22
Mrdi Banned Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: PA Posts: 3,478	YM2 Functionally correct A proper tool Just like Comex Well almost, ... too bad it had to be compromised with a BlInG factor. The cost of the YM2 is about the same as the cost of a new mainsail on a sled.

20 April 2007, 11:48 AM	#23
Mrdi Banned Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: PA Posts: 3,478	YM2 Functionally correct A proper tool Just like Comex Well almost, ... too bad it had to be compromised with a BlInG factor. The cost of the YM2 is about the same as the cost of a new mainsail on a sled.

20 April 2007, 12:04 PM	#24
syahriltaher "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2006 Real Name: Syahril Location: Bogor, Indonesia Watch: Rolex, Omega Posts: 650	Guys, I think we have to start accepting the reality. Rolex are going to launch the YMII real soon...If you check their website, they've put the YMII there already...It indicates that they're serious about it... The good point is maybe for those who already own the current YM (like I do), can expect appreciation of value....may be just like the vintage orange hand explorer II...hehehe... Best Regards, __________________ - Rolex RG Daytona 116505 - Rolex SS Submariner "Hulk" - Rolex SS Sky Dweller "Black Dial" - Rolex SS GMT Master II 16710 "Coke" - Rolex GMT Master II CHNR "Rootbeer" TT - Rolex SS Daytona Ceramic 116500LN "Black Dial" - Rolex 126710 "New Batman" 2022 - Rolex SS/WG Datejust 41 126334 "Blue Roman" - Panerai "PAM 88" GMT - Omega New Moonwatch 3861

20 April 2007, 12:38 PM	#25
leopardprey Banned Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Chad Location: Around the world Watch: Panerai 233 Posts: 4,204	It would look much better without YachtMaster on the Bezel!!!

20 April 2007, 11:44 PM	#27
astcell "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Real Name: Robert Location: Angelus Oaks, CA Watch: 116713 Posts: 6,828	When I firat saw it I said "A watch for wearing on a yacht? It IS the yacht! It looks like someone melted a box of crayons on a Daytona. Holy moley what a conflaguration. I think the Yacht racing folks will ban the watch unanimously. It truly looks like a semaphore carnivore.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)