ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 October 2010, 08:53 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Vincent
Location: Louisiana
Watch: 16710 Coke
Posts: 448
|
Rolex gold
Are we getting our moneys worth on the all gold models? When I do the math the numbers don't add up as far as what Rolex is selling their gold for. My wife says stick with the stainless models and buy a nice 18k bracelet for the right hand, What say you?
|
9 October 2010, 08:59 AM | #2 |
Facilitator
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Omnipresent
Posts: 33,587
|
You will definitely pay a premium if you buy a new gold model.
A used but excellent condition gold model will save you potentially many $1,000's. At least a Rolex is more pretty on your wrist (and useful) than a gold bar strapped to it |
9 October 2010, 09:37 AM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Tim
Location: tennessee
Watch: 16623 YM
Posts: 3,630
|
As little as a few Days ago there were Deals from some of the Respected Members for all 18K Models for Waaaaaaaaaaay cheap.Anyhow,do your Homework
|
9 October 2010, 09:47 AM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Tim
Location: tennessee
Watch: 16623 YM
Posts: 3,630
|
Don't know exactly what You might be after,But here is just one example.Mike(Invision)had his 116718 GMT2c Listed here for close to 30 percent off not long ago.Theres a whole bunch of Reputable sellers here that you should Touch base with
|
9 October 2010, 09:59 AM | #5 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
What math ???? Jewelry never sells for the value of the materials, and neither does a Rolex.. (or a Coach or Luis Vuitton bag, etc.) As Steve mentioned, if it is a concern and you can't afford to buy new, buy used where somebody else has taken the initial devaluation.......
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
9 October 2010, 10:32 AM | #6 | |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
Quote:
Let me give you a concrete example: List price of SS Sub-date 16610 = US$6,000 List price of TT Sub-date 16613 = US$9,300 So in reality, the MSRP of the TT model is a whopping US$3,300 extra for a bugger all amount of 18K gold you get in exchange. Of course, you will get a much better discount on the TT model, but at the end of the day, it's what you like and what price you're prepared to pay. If you like gold, especially yellow gold, then you won't mind paying the extra $$$.................but you'd still be paying a helluva lot more for the actual gold you get in return. JJ |
|
9 October 2010, 10:40 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Vincent
Location: Louisiana
Watch: 16710 Coke
Posts: 448
|
I see your point,I just was looking for a justification why 6 oz of 18k should cost an extra 10k, If I had the money I would but the 116718 for sale
|
9 October 2010, 10:45 AM | #8 | |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
Quote:
If you can pick one up cheap and really love gold, go for it. Gold does have its own characteristic look, but may not be everyone's cuppa. Good luck - JJ |
|
9 October 2010, 10:48 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Alex
Location: NYC
Watch: No batteries
Posts: 248
|
Spot prices per ounce is for 24kt. If you want gold for investing look at the ETF GLD. I think it will pull back but then snap up. IMHO
|
9 October 2010, 10:52 AM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,391
|
I would only buy a gold model used. The old 16618 retailed for 24500USD, a AD near me has a used 2005 model with box&papers, for only 13850USD! That's a 10k discount!!
|
9 October 2010, 11:01 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Vincent
Location: Louisiana
Watch: 16710 Coke
Posts: 448
|
Yeah, The Blue 16618 is a stunning watch, I have seen some as low as 10k on here, that seems like a good deal, some I have seen look like the bracelet is quite loose though, I would not want to have to order a new all gold bracelet from Rolex
|
9 October 2010, 11:42 AM | #12 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,006
|
Quote:
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
|
9 October 2010, 11:48 AM | #13 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Wolfgang
Location: New Jersey.
Watch: Rolex Tudor Omega
Posts: 5,592
|
If you thought gold models are bad look at the platinum models and see how out of wack the math is.....
__________________
TRF member #917 |
9 October 2010, 12:26 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Renato
Location: New York
Posts: 2,396
|
Also, I think that we're really talking about scrap value. The additional cost is attributed to the labor, craftsmanship, etc., that is necessary to produce the watch.
As for platinum, from what I understand, it is a more difficult and labor intensive material to work with, so the cost is passed on to the consumer. |
9 October 2010, 12:50 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
|
Well in weight wise you get much more gold kn your bracelet for the same price you pay for a Rolex. But then again, there's the workmanship cost, the delivery cost, and many other incorporated costs involved. It would be much cheaper if your gold watch is made by a private goldsmith, but will it be a Rolex?
You can say more the same about stainless steel. Are they actually worth what you're paying for in ss models? I don't think so..
__________________
My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417. |
9 October 2010, 01:32 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Howard
Location: Midwest
Watch: 18078
Posts: 604
|
<<< You can say more the same about stainless steel. Are they actually worth what you're paying for in ss models? I don't think so.. >>>
Yes I agree. How can people talk about the price of the gold models being out of proportion to their actual precious metal content, yet in the next breath talk about an all stainless model being a better value? At 1347.00 spot, 18K gold is currently valued at just above $1000.00 per oz. whereas the value of 904L stainless per oz. is pretty much next to nothing.
__________________
Day-Date Bark Finish 18078, TT Datejust Turn-O-Graph Oysterquartz 17013 Explorer I 114270 |
9 October 2010, 02:25 PM | #17 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: CA
Watch: 42mm Exp 2
Posts: 378
|
Take a bar of gold and turn it into a watch or a piece of jewelry. I doubt you'll charge only for the value of the gold used. Think about the cost of skilled labor, industrial manufacturing, international advertising, etc. Rolex isn't paying for it, you are.
|
9 October 2010, 02:29 PM | #18 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Jinder
Location: Ontario
Watch: 116713
Posts: 601
|
|
9 October 2010, 04:16 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: uk
Posts: 389
|
Hi guys let us try to equate this in real terms, in the UK 18k gold is scrapping for aprox £21.00 a gram an all gold sub weighs 225grms that is £4725.00 worth of scrap, then you sell the movemnt as well for a bonus. the new price of the sub is £18500.00 but with the with discount you can get them for £12000.00sh new or £10000.00 used, the stainless steel sub c new price is aprox £5000.00, what is its scrap weight of stainless, 0. so if we take the £5000.00 off a second hand gold sub you are actually paying £5000.00 for it and it scraps for £4725.00 so in fact it is only costing you £275.00 for an all gold submariner which looks like a million dollars.........ha ha ha work that out
|
9 October 2010, 04:57 PM | #20 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,526
|
Great logic Paul and absolutely amazing calculations.
__________________
E |
9 October 2010, 05:11 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: uk
Posts: 389
|
Cheers bud, its weekend i allways get carried away at weekend,
|
9 October 2010, 05:22 PM | #22 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,526
|
__________________
E |
10 October 2010, 01:22 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Vincent
Location: Louisiana
Watch: 16710 Coke
Posts: 448
|
thanks Paul you just convinced me to save for a used all gold Sub
|
10 October 2010, 01:57 AM | #24 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Mike
Location: Destin, FL USA
Watch: Outerspace DayDate
Posts: 2,662
|
My 18K GMT IIc weighs 240 grams which probably equates 180 grams of 18K (.75) gold. So ~ $6k of gold value. The SS runs $7275 or so. So a gold 18K GMT IIc is really only $13k and change. But the older ones had much lighter bracelets so be careful.
I paid quite a premium for my GMT and still love the watch a lot, trouble is I obtained my Grail DD so when I have the chance to wear a fancy watch like the 18k GMT, I almost always wear the Meteorite DD. I am currently looking for a Platty DD to dress down some. Most folks have no idea it is not just SS. Now there is a dilemma !! As far as gold Rolex watches go I have learned a valuable lesson. Go with a devalued pristine watch with the features you want and you won't take a great big hit. Mike |
10 October 2010, 04:28 AM | #25 | |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: dan
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: keystone pocket
Posts: 5,917
|
Quote:
and now, i'm about to hear how you only want a new watch from an AD....... so be it........vive la difference! |
|
10 October 2010, 04:53 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Renato
Location: New York
Posts: 2,396
|
|
10 October 2010, 08:22 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Vincent
Location: Louisiana
Watch: 16710 Coke
Posts: 448
|
Mike your watch is #1 on my wish list. Do you think you will regret selling the watch?
|
10 October 2010, 09:16 AM | #28 | |
Facilitator
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Omnipresent
Posts: 33,587
|
Quote:
Seems much harder to tell fakes too (than Rolex ) on the internet |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.