The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 9 October 2010, 08:53 AM   #1
WARVET
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Vincent
Location: Louisiana
Watch: 16710 Coke
Posts: 448
Rolex gold

Are we getting our moneys worth on the all gold models? When I do the math the numbers don't add up as far as what Rolex is selling their gold for. My wife says stick with the stainless models and buy a nice 18k bracelet for the right hand, What say you?
WARVET is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2010, 08:59 AM   #2
Lol-x
Facilitator
 
Lol-x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Omnipresent
Posts: 33,587
You will definitely pay a premium if you buy a new gold model.

A used but excellent condition gold model will save you potentially many $1,000's.

At least a Rolex is more pretty on your wrist (and useful) than a gold bar strapped to it
Lol-x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2010, 09:37 AM   #3
TRW
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Tim
Location: tennessee
Watch: 16623 YM
Posts: 3,630
As little as a few Days ago there were Deals from some of the Respected Members for all 18K Models for Waaaaaaaaaaay cheap.Anyhow,do your Homework
TRW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2010, 09:47 AM   #4
TRW
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Tim
Location: tennessee
Watch: 16623 YM
Posts: 3,630
Don't know exactly what You might be after,But here is just one example.Mike(Invision)had his 116718 GMT2c Listed here for close to 30 percent off not long ago.Theres a whole bunch of Reputable sellers here that you should Touch base with
TRW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2010, 09:59 AM   #5
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514


What math ???? Jewelry never sells for the value of the materials, and neither does a Rolex.. (or a Coach or Luis Vuitton bag, etc.)

As Steve mentioned, if it is a concern and you can't afford to buy new, buy used where somebody else has taken the initial devaluation.......
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2010, 10:32 AM   #6
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post


What math ???? Jewelry never sells for the value of the materials, and neither does a Rolex.. (or a Coach or Luis Vuitton bag, etc.)

As Steve mentioned, if it is a concern and you can't afford to buy new, buy used where somebody else has taken the initial devaluation.......
Spot-on!! If you take the actual weight of the gold and compare it what you've paid, you'll feel like you've been completely ripped off!!

Let me give you a concrete example:

List price of SS Sub-date 16610 = US$6,000

List price of TT Sub-date 16613 = US$9,300

So in reality, the MSRP of the TT model is a whopping US$3,300 extra for a bugger all amount of 18K gold you get in exchange.

Of course, you will get a much better discount on the TT model, but at the end of the day, it's what you like and what price you're prepared to pay. If you like gold, especially yellow gold, then you won't mind paying the extra $$$.................but you'd still be paying a helluva lot more for the actual gold you get in return.

JJ
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2010, 10:40 AM   #7
WARVET
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Vincent
Location: Louisiana
Watch: 16710 Coke
Posts: 448
I see your point,I just was looking for a justification why 6 oz of 18k should cost an extra 10k, If I had the money I would but the 116718 for sale
WARVET is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2010, 10:45 AM   #8
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by WARVET View Post
I see your point,I just was looking for a justification why 6 oz of 18k should cost an extra 10k, If I had the money I would but the 116718 for sale
That is one good looking watch................and that is also the reason why gold watches drop so drastically in value.

If you can pick one up cheap and really love gold, go for it. Gold does have its own characteristic look, but may not be everyone's cuppa.

Good luck - JJ
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2010, 10:48 AM   #9
alxforschnr
"TRF" Member
 
alxforschnr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Alex
Location: NYC
Watch: No batteries
Posts: 248
Spot prices per ounce is for 24kt. If you want gold for investing look at the ETF GLD. I think it will pull back but then snap up. IMHO

alxforschnr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2010, 10:52 AM   #10
Michael M.
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,391
I would only buy a gold model used. The old 16618 retailed for 24500USD, a AD near me has a used 2005 model with box&papers, for only 13850USD! That's a 10k discount!!
Michael M. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2010, 11:01 AM   #11
WARVET
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Vincent
Location: Louisiana
Watch: 16710 Coke
Posts: 448
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael M. View Post
I would only buy a gold model used. The old 16618 retailed for 24500USD, a AD near me has a used 2005 model with box&papers, for only 13850USD! That's a 10k discount!!
Yeah, The Blue 16618 is a stunning watch, I have seen some as low as 10k on here, that seems like a good deal, some I have seen look like the bracelet is quite loose though, I would not want to have to order a new all gold bracelet from Rolex
WARVET is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2010, 11:42 AM   #12
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post


What math ???? Jewelry never sells for the value of the materials, and neither does a Rolex.. (or a Coach or Luis Vuitton bag, etc.)

As Steve mentioned, if it is a concern and you can't afford to buy new, buy used where somebody else has taken the initial devaluation.......
Exactly--Well said !!
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2010, 11:48 AM   #13
Wolfgang427
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Wolfgang427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Wolfgang
Location: New Jersey.
Watch: Rolex Tudor Omega
Posts: 5,592
If you thought gold models are bad look at the platinum models and see how out of wack the math is.....
__________________
TRF member #917
Wolfgang427 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2010, 12:26 PM   #14
Renoir
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Renato
Location: New York
Posts: 2,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteelerFan1965 View Post
Exactly--Well said !!
Also, I think that we're really talking about scrap value. The additional cost is attributed to the labor, craftsmanship, etc., that is necessary to produce the watch.

As for platinum, from what I understand, it is a more difficult and labor intensive material to work with, so the cost is passed on to the consumer.

Renoir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2010, 12:50 PM   #15
Shade
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
Well in weight wise you get much more gold kn your bracelet for the same price you pay for a Rolex. But then again, there's the workmanship cost, the delivery cost, and many other incorporated costs involved. It would be much cheaper if your gold watch is made by a private goldsmith, but will it be a Rolex?

You can say more the same about stainless steel. Are they actually worth what you're paying for in ss models? I don't think so..
__________________
My collections..

http://rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=33241&dateline=128831  6747

Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.
Shade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2010, 01:32 PM   #16
hhh007
"TRF" Member
 
hhh007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Howard
Location: Midwest
Watch: 18078
Posts: 604
<<< You can say more the same about stainless steel. Are they actually worth what you're paying for in ss models? I don't think so.. >>>



Yes I agree. How can people talk about the price of the gold models being out of proportion to their actual precious metal content, yet in the next breath talk about an all stainless model being a better value? At 1347.00 spot, 18K gold is currently valued at just above $1000.00 per oz. whereas the value of 904L stainless per oz. is pretty much next to nothing.
__________________
Day-Date Bark Finish 18078,
TT Datejust Turn-O-Graph
Oysterquartz 17013
Explorer I 114270
hhh007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2010, 02:25 PM   #17
burger'n'fries
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: CA
Watch: 42mm Exp 2
Posts: 378
Take a bar of gold and turn it into a watch or a piece of jewelry. I doubt you'll charge only for the value of the gold used. Think about the cost of skilled labor, industrial manufacturing, international advertising, etc. Rolex isn't paying for it, you are.
burger'n'fries is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2010, 02:29 PM   #18
Jinder
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Jinder
Location: Ontario
Watch: 116713
Posts: 601
http://halmartins.com/watch/rolex-wa...prod_1405.html

Not bad really?
Jinder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2010, 04:16 PM   #19
rangrov
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: uk
Posts: 389
Hi guys let us try to equate this in real terms, in the UK 18k gold is scrapping for aprox £21.00 a gram an all gold sub weighs 225grms that is £4725.00 worth of scrap, then you sell the movemnt as well for a bonus. the new price of the sub is £18500.00 but with the with discount you can get them for £12000.00sh new or £10000.00 used, the stainless steel sub c new price is aprox £5000.00, what is its scrap weight of stainless, 0. so if we take the £5000.00 off a second hand gold sub you are actually paying £5000.00 for it and it scraps for £4725.00 so in fact it is only costing you £275.00 for an all gold submariner which looks like a million dollars.........ha ha ha work that out
rangrov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2010, 04:57 PM   #20
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,526
Great logic Paul and absolutely amazing calculations.
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2010, 05:11 PM   #21
rangrov
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: uk
Posts: 389
Cheers bud, its weekend i allways get carried away at weekend,
rangrov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2010, 05:22 PM   #22
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,526
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 October 2010, 01:22 AM   #23
WARVET
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Vincent
Location: Louisiana
Watch: 16710 Coke
Posts: 448
thanks Paul you just convinced me to save for a used all gold Sub
WARVET is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 October 2010, 01:57 AM   #24
InVision
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Mike
Location: Destin, FL USA
Watch: Outerspace DayDate
Posts: 2,662
My 18K GMT IIc weighs 240 grams which probably equates 180 grams of 18K (.75) gold. So ~ $6k of gold value. The SS runs $7275 or so. So a gold 18K GMT IIc is really only $13k and change. But the older ones had much lighter bracelets so be careful.

I paid quite a premium for my GMT and still love the watch a lot, trouble is I obtained my Grail DD so when I have the chance to wear a fancy watch like the 18k GMT, I almost always wear the Meteorite DD. I am currently looking for a Platty DD to dress down some. Most folks have no idea it is not just SS. Now there is a dilemma !!

As far as gold Rolex watches go I have learned a valuable lesson. Go with a devalued pristine watch with the features you want and you won't take a great big hit.

Mike
InVision is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 October 2010, 04:28 AM   #25
unclesallie
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
unclesallie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: dan
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: keystone pocket
Posts: 5,917
Quote:
Originally Posted by InVision View Post
My 18K GMT IIc weighs 240 grams which probably equates 180 grams of 18K (.75) gold. So ~ $6k of gold value. The SS runs $7275 or so. So a gold 18K GMT IIc is really only $13k and change. But the older ones had much lighter bracelets so be careful.

I paid quite a premium for my GMT and still love the watch a lot, trouble is I obtained my Grail DD so when I have the chance to wear a fancy watch like the 18k GMT, I almost always wear the Meteorite DD. I am currently looking for a Platty DD to dress down some. Most folks have no idea it is not just SS. Now there is a dilemma !!

As far as gold Rolex watches go I have learned a valuable lesson. Go with a devalued pristine watch with the features you want and you won't take a great big hit.

Mike
agreed! and not only that, buy from a trusted seller, outside the AD's shop, and you will save even more. in fact, a hell of a lot more!

and now, i'm about to hear how you only want a new watch from an AD.......

so be it........vive la difference!
unclesallie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 October 2010, 04:53 AM   #26
Renoir
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Renato
Location: New York
Posts: 2,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by InVision View Post
I am currently looking for a Platty DD to dress down some. Most folks have no idea it is not just SS. Now there is a dilemma !!

Mike
Mike,

What's cool is when people that are familiar with precious metals notice it. It really has a different hue to it than SS.
Renoir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 October 2010, 08:22 AM   #27
WARVET
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Vincent
Location: Louisiana
Watch: 16710 Coke
Posts: 448
Mike your watch is #1 on my wish list. Do you think you will regret selling the watch?
WARVET is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 October 2010, 09:16 AM   #28
Lol-x
Facilitator
 
Lol-x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Omnipresent
Posts: 33,587
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
Jewelry never sells for the value of the materials, and neither does a Rolex.. (or a Coach or Luis Vuitton bag, etc.)
If the Louis Vuitton belt I got on e-scam(bay) is not 100% I am going to be one very unhappy monkey. Crazy high prices for that stuff even on the bay
Seems much harder to tell fakes too (than Rolex ) on the internet
Lol-x is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.