ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Aspirin · 18 October 2010, 05:54 AM

I know this is a stupid question, but just wondering of which one much better for daily wearing? Sub ND COSC 14060M and Exp II black face.

sleddog · 18 October 2010, 06:00 AM

Both are absolutely perfect for everyday wear.!

mike · 18 October 2010, 06:28 AM

The one you like the best.

Aspirin · 18 October 2010, 06:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleddog1000

Both are absolutely perfect for everyday wear.!

Thanks, sleddog1000, but... you know, this answer is not I want!

Roxas · 19 October 2010, 03:35 AM

Sub No Date.

padi56 · 19 October 2010, 03:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleddog1000

Both are absolutely perfect for everyday wear.!

Have to agree and weight wise no differnce on wrist,myself would choose the sub I just dont like polished steel bezels.

R1@160@alltimes · 19 October 2010, 03:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mike

The one you like the best.

cornerstore · 19 October 2010, 04:19 AM

Sub sits a little higher on the wrist but both are great watches.Tough choice.

clum19 · 19 October 2010, 04:20 AM

both great daily wearers, but I prefer the ND Sub

Poohsan · 19 October 2010, 09:01 AM

Sub... It is always useful to be able to set the bezel as a reminder!

Clay · 19 October 2010, 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mike

The one you like the best.

Jannal · 19 October 2010, 10:24 AM

Explorer II is better. It's thinner and lighter hence more comfortable to wear daily.

AA717driver · 19 October 2010, 12:37 PM

Alternate days. These are, IMO, equivalent watches. Now, ask the Explorer/Sub v. DJ and you'll get some responses.

TC

stockae92 · 19 October 2010, 03:15 PM

For daily wear, i would go with the one with date .. :)

JJ Irani · 19 October 2010, 03:21 PM

Excellent watches both with different functions and uses.

JJ

dba · 19 October 2010, 03:37 PM

I miss having my GMT with the extra hour hand and date function but I do love the look of the Sub. I'd alternate watches each day so they both stay wound and showing the correct time.

George Ab · 19 October 2010, 04:08 PM

Both are extremely comfortable. That said, the Exp II is slightly more comfortable due to its 20g lighter weight and low on the wrist.

xjeeunitx · 19 October 2010, 04:24 PM

I'd prefer the Explorer II.

Shade · 19 October 2010, 05:38 PM

Both are great, but the expII gets my vote..

padi56 · 19 October 2010, 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by George Ab

Both are extremely comfortable. That said, the Exp II is slightly more comfortable due to its 20g lighter weight and low on the wrist.

Exp11 16570 126 grams 14060m 127 grams.

vukotab · 20 October 2010, 12:05 AM

I had Exp II and it`s very comfortable watch. I wore it every day for three years...

Aspirin · 20 October 2010, 03:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleddog1000

Both are absolutely perfect for everyday wear.!

Quote:

Originally Posted by mike

The one you like the best.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roxas

Sub No Date.

Quote:

Originally Posted by padi56

Have to agree and weight wise no differnce on wrist,myself would choose the sub I just dont like polished steel bezels.

Quote:

Originally Posted by R1@160@alltimes

Quote:

Originally Posted by patrick09

Sub sits a little higher on the wrist but both are great watches.Tough choice.

Quote:

Originally Posted by clum19

both great daily wearers, but I prefer the ND Sub

Quote:

Originally Posted by Poohsan

Sub... It is always useful to be able to set the bezel as a reminder!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clay

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jannal

Explorer II is better. It's thinner and lighter hence more comfortable to wear daily.

Quote:

Originally Posted by AA717driver

Alternate days. These are, IMO, equivalent watches. Now, ask the Explorer/Sub v. DJ and you'll get some responses.

TC

Quote:

Originally Posted by stockae92

For daily wear, i would go with the one with date .. :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

Excellent watches both with different functions and uses.

JJ

Quote:

Originally Posted by dba

I miss having my GMT with the extra hour hand and date function but I do love the look of the Sub. I'd alternate watches each day so they both stay wound and showing the correct time.

Quote:

Originally Posted by George Ab

Both are extremely comfortable. That said, the Exp II is slightly more comfortable due to its 20g lighter weight and low on the wrist.

Quote:

Originally Posted by xjeeunitx

I'd prefer the Explorer II.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shade

Both are great, but the expII gets my vote..

Quote:

Originally Posted by padi56

Exp11 16570 126 grams 14060m 127 grams.

Quote:

Originally Posted by vukotab

I had Exp II and it`s very comfortable watch. I wore it every day for three years...

Thanks all you guys' responses, but the 14060M still out of stock in ADs!

Lion · 20 October 2010, 03:52 AM

Both watches are very nice but they do have different attributes. If you do not need to know the date then the Sub would be perfect and of course if you want the date feature go with the Explorer II. I happen to own a Sub ND and wouldn't trade it for the world!!!

Tombstone · 20 October 2010, 03:54 AM

Sub gets my vote.

Kenny807 · 20 October 2010, 03:58 AM

Sub ND

rosspanics · 20 October 2010, 04:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aspirin

Thanks all you guys' responses, but the 14060M still out of stock in ADs!

My AD has one, PM me if you want contact info.

18 October 2010, 05:54 AM	#1
Aspirin "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: at home Posts: 1,330	Sub 14060M COSC and Exp II black face I know this is a stupid question, but just wondering of which one much better for daily wearing? Sub ND COSC 14060M and Exp II black face. Attached Images

18 October 2010, 06:00 AM	#2
sleddog TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Rob Location: Nearby. Posts: 24,931	Both are absolutely perfect for everyday wear.! __________________ He who wears a Rolex is always on time, even when late!! TRF's "After Dark" Bar & Nightclub Patron-Founding Member..

19 October 2010, 04:20 AM	#9
clum19 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Real Name: Chris Location: NY Watch: SubC/Seamaster Posts: 235	both great daily wearers, but I prefer the ND Sub __________________ Rolex Submariner 116610 LN Vintage Omega Seamaster

19 October 2010, 09:01 AM	#10
Poohsan "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Real Name: Arron Location: phoenix, AZ Watch: GMT 1675 Posts: 764	Sub... It is always useful to be able to set the bezel as a reminder! __________________ 1680, 1675, 116610LN, GMT Master II, Explorer II, Tudor Big Block 79170

19 October 2010, 04:08 PM	#17
George Ab "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: George Location: Seattle Watch: One of Them Posts: 6,924	Both are extremely comfortable. That said, the Exp II is slightly more comfortable due to its 20g lighter weight and low on the wrist. __________________

18 October 2010, 06:28 AM	#3
mike "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 22,683	The one you like the best.

19 October 2010, 03:35 AM	#5
Roxas "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Earth Watch: 14060M Posts: 516	Sub No Date.

19 October 2010, 04:19 AM	#8
cornerstore "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Canada Posts: 4,010	Sub sits a little higher on the wrist but both are great watches.Tough choice.

19 October 2010, 10:24 AM	#12
Jannal "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Hong Kong Posts: 685	Explorer II is better. It's thinner and lighter hence more comfortable to wear daily.

19 October 2010, 12:37 PM	#13
AA717driver "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Indianapolis Watch: SSub 14060 "K" Posts: 62	Alternate days. These are, IMO, equivalent watches. Now, ask the Explorer/Sub v. DJ and you'll get some responses. TC

19 October 2010, 03:15 PM	#14
stockae92 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Socal Posts: 4,964	For daily wear, i would go with the one with date .. :)

19 October 2010, 03:21 PM	#15
JJ Irani Fondly Remembered Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: JJ Location: Auckland, NZ Watch: ALL SOLD!! Posts: 74,319	Excellent watches both with different functions and uses. JJ

19 October 2010, 03:37 PM	#16
dba 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Real Name: David Location: Gardnerville, NV Watch: 16710 Posts: 2,706	I miss having my GMT with the extra hour hand and date function but I do love the look of the Sub. I'd alternate watches each day so they both stay wound and showing the correct time.

19 October 2010, 04:24 PM	#18
xjeeunitx 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 5,533	I'd prefer the Explorer II. __________________ *2 FACTOR AUTHENTICATION ENABLED.*

19 October 2010, 05:38 PM	#19
Shade "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Norman Location: Jakarta Watch: All of 'em.. Posts: 2,926	Both are great, but the expII gets my vote.. __________________ My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.

20 October 2010, 12:05 AM	#21
vukotab "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Real Name: Vukota Brajovi Location: Belgrade,Serbia Watch: ing movies! Posts: 3,812	I had Exp II and it`s very comfortable watch. I wore it every day for three years... __________________ My fashion blog and Instagram: https://stylebyvukota.com/ https://instagram.com/vukotabrajovic/

20 October 2010, 03:52 AM	#23
Lion "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Leo Location: Midwest Watch: GMT-II 16710 PEPSI Posts: 21,461	Both watches are very nice but they do have different attributes. If you do not need to know the date then the Sub would be perfect and of course if you want the date feature go with the Explorer II. I happen to own a Sub ND and wouldn't trade it for the world!!! __________________ SS GMT-II 16710 PEPSI(Z-serial#) THE ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MEN AND BOYS IS THE PRICE OF THE TOYS!!! MontBlanc Meisterstuck Doue Silver Barley MontBlanc Meisterstuck Solitaire Doue Signum Proud Card Carrying Member of the Curmudgeons.....Yikes!!!

20 October 2010, 03:54 AM	#24
Tombstone "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Real Name: Richard Location: LV, NV Watch: LV Sub and others Posts: 2,689	Sub gets my vote. __________________ Always working...by choice

20 October 2010, 03:58 AM	#25
Kenny807 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Ken Location: Lakeway, TX Watch: 14060M Posts: 36	Sub ND

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)