ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

sportsmaven20 · 12 February 2011, 02:38 AM

I know there's a size difference, but can anyone share the actual mm size difference between the two?

For those who own both watches, how would you rate the comfort differences between them?

Is there a noticeable difference to you when wearing the Sub-C...does the clasp get in the way?

Thanks in advance for your feedback and comments.

Sub'erman · 12 February 2011, 08:29 AM

Had them both.
They both feel good on the wrist.
As for size of the clasp I'd say they alike-ish...

imono · 12 February 2011, 09:17 AM

Same 20mm size bracelet.
There is a difference in the clasp style.
The SubC has a longer clasp to accommodate the diver's extension link.
Here is a picture.

MortgageGuy · 12 February 2011, 09:50 AM

I currently have the GMT C and do find it more appealing asthetically that the Sub C clasp. I have had 2 sub C's and comfort is NOT an issue with the larger clasp. However since I have a 6.50 inch wrist, the clasp pretty much covered the entire bottom of my wrist

This would NOT deter me from the watch rather just an observation.

Sub C clasp ease of adjustability... GMT C clasp long term comfort/more asthetically appealing IMO

esm · 12 February 2011, 11:20 AM

Due to the 100m depth rating/thinner case back, the 116710 wears flater, hence can be more comfortable most wrists.

SS Oyster · 12 February 2011, 03:15 PM

Same quality bracelet and clasp ... 100% bullet proof in both watches, but the glidelock adds more adjustability from day to day, which has its advantages.

sportsmaven20 · 13 February 2011, 01:30 AM

Thanks guys for all of your comments and feedback...very helpful!

sportsmaven20 · 13 February 2011, 01:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by imono

Same 20mm size bracelet.
There is a difference in the clasp style.
The SubC has a longer clasp to accommodate the diver's extension link.
Here is a picture.

The visual certainly helps...thank you!

12 February 2011, 02:38 AM	#1
sportsmaven20 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Real Name: Randy Location: USA Watch: Rolex Posts: 1,925	Bracelet clasp...Sub-C vs. GMTIIC I know there's a size difference, but can anyone share the actual mm size difference between the two? For those who own both watches, how would you rate the comfort differences between them? Is there a noticeable difference to you when wearing the Sub-C...does the clasp get in the way? Thanks in advance for your feedback and comments.

12 February 2011, 08:29 AM	#2
Sub'erman "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: SK Location: Greenland Watch: Various SUBs Posts: 473	Had them both. They both feel good on the wrist. As for size of the clasp I'd say they alike-ish... __________________ Founder and CEO of the "BLUME" Club Rolex ref: 14060 - 92', 16600- 06', 116610LN 11' In Da House!! He who only loves one woman and one watch, doesn't truly love women or watches!! "Not all that is countable, counts; and not all that counts, is countable"

12 February 2011, 09:50 AM	#4
MortgageGuy "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Adam Location: Orlando, Florida Watch: Me Posts: 9,935	I currently have the GMT C and do find it more appealing asthetically that the Sub C clasp. I have had 2 sub C's and comfort is NOT an issue with the larger clasp. However since I have a 6.50 inch wrist, the clasp pretty much covered the entire bottom of my wrist This would NOT deter me from the watch rather just an observation. Sub C clasp ease of adjustability... GMT C clasp long term comfort/more asthetically appealing IMO __________________ The richest people in the world look for and build NETWORKS, Everyone else looks for work... Robert Kiyosaki

12 February 2011, 09:17 AM	#3
imono "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: USA Posts: 3,241	Same 20mm size bracelet. There is a difference in the clasp style. The SubC has a longer clasp to accommodate the diver's extension link. Here is a picture.

12 February 2011, 11:20 AM	#5
esm "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Eric Location: Location,Location Watch: this, bro... Posts: 15,340	Due to the 100m depth rating/thinner case back, the 116710 wears flater, hence can be more comfortable most wrists.

12 February 2011, 03:15 PM	#6
SS Oyster 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: USA Posts: 9,218	Same quality bracelet and clasp ... 100% bullet proof in both watches, but the glidelock adds more adjustability from day to day, which has its advantages.

13 February 2011, 01:30 AM	#7
sportsmaven20 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Real Name: Randy Location: USA Watch: Rolex Posts: 1,925	Thanks guys for all of your comments and feedback...very helpful!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)