ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

htc8p · 17 January 2011, 12:07 PM

i like it when its on my wrist it gives a solid feel but i dont like it when its on the dresser or side table. it looks funny and out of proportion

PHDX2 · 17 January 2011, 12:08 PM

Perfect look and feel!

Eric88 · 17 January 2011, 03:33 PM

Thanks for all the comments!

I still love the older case style, but since the Sub-C is my current daily beater, I've had a lot of time to get used to the new lug style. As many have mentioned, it looks polarizing at first, but it grows on you after awhile.

Here are some extreme close-ups of just the lugs and bracelet I took on the beach today. There is actually a very sexy transition between the wide lugs and the bracelet, very much in harmony with the dimensions of the bracelet and the direction of the brushing makes it even more harmonious.

Gerardus · 17 January 2011, 04:55 PM

The lugs are okay!
But the classic ones also do have their charmes.

Sub'erman · 17 January 2011, 08:54 PM

Daddy likey!!!!

awright102 · 17 January 2011, 10:27 PM

I'm lovin mine. I have the Sub C black and a 16710 GMT black. I switch between both. The new case and braclet does give the watch a more expensive feel. I can't stop looking at mine and i've been wearing it for six months.

Gottog · 17 January 2011, 10:46 PM

The lugs are fine. You won't notice it in real life as much as say... the short hands on the new Explorer

Eric88 · 14 February 2011, 01:16 PM

I thought I'd revive this thread after 4 solid months of wearing the Sub-C non-stop. I've started to backslide just a bit on my infatuation with the lugs, particularly now that I've worn short sleeves a few days with warm weather (pretty much frigid winter until a few days ago). Certain angles of the lugs + bracelet are just a little bit over the top, but I still love the watch. I've just started to have a slight yearning for the slimmer lugs of the pre-ceramic. Call me crazy and I'm sure it is just a phase.

Anyone with fresh perspective on the thick Sub-C lugs?

moby33 · 14 February 2011, 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric88

I thought I'd revive this thread after 4 solid months of wearing the Sub-C non-stop. I've started to backslide just a bit on my infatuation with the lugs, particularly now that I've worn short sleeves a few days with warm weather (pretty much frigid winter until a few days ago). Certain angles of the lugs + bracelet are just a little bit over the top, but I still love the watch. I've just started to have a slight yearning for the slimmer lugs of the pre-ceramic. Call me crazy and I'm sure it is just a phase.

Anyone with fresh perspective on the thick Sub-C lugs?

Not a fresh perspective...just the same 'ol love I've had for the watch since day one (actually, I like it a little more each day...and I've never not liked it). Tried on a '73 Red Sub this weekend & have to admit I thought my SubC looked a ton better. Yes the Red Sub was a vintage classic (and well out of my price range), but from an aesthetics standpoint it looked like a dainty womens version of the Sub. No way this guy will ever have a yearning for the slimmer lugs again.

psv · 14 February 2011, 01:52 PM

No probs here. Then again, since I've got some older Subs and SDs as well I can always switched back/fwd if I like.

StarSovereign · 14 February 2011, 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MortgageGuy

NO problems here... love them all

Thanks for the side by side pic. I guess I never realized that the case on the Sub C was different than on the GMT-IIc...Go figure...Now I'm not too concerned about having both watches in my collection...

bigjon · 14 February 2011, 02:01 PM

I think the lugs go with the case and look proportional. I understand why people love the classic older subs also. But For the price that rolex is now charging, the new case and bracelet seem more substantial.

Sport Rolex · 14 February 2011, 02:20 PM

I had a choice between the two versions when I bought my classic sub TT and went for the slimmer look. Although I do like the other enhancements.

Rani Drama · 14 February 2011, 02:52 PM

I like the lugs actually. Makes the watch fit in a little more with the current trend of larger watches while still maintaining the perfect size.

kaiserphoenix · 14 February 2011, 08:17 PM

I also love the newer lugs, makes the watch appear more modern and solid (was solid before as well) but "look" is the keyword. I just love this damn watch!!!

travisb · 14 February 2011, 08:30 PM

I was a little skeptical at first but now I can say that it is a terrific addition to the oyster case.
The classic design is nice as well but I don't ever see myself going back.

Intruder99 · 14 February 2011, 09:17 PM

i prefer the classic, the new case is a jump forward and has lost the connection with the past.

bounce · 15 February 2011, 01:17 AM

I think they suit the watch well, they make it look a bit chunkier which I prefer.

Xpert37 · 15 February 2011, 01:30 AM

I said no to the bigger lugs and that was the main reason I settled for the classic 16610, which I think is more refined and balanced watch and looks much better on my wrist. I do understand people's fascination about the maxi dial and the improved bracelet, to me, I don't really mind these updates as the classic sub is what it is, a timeless classic.

moby33 · 15 February 2011, 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Intruder99

i prefer the classic, the new case is a jump forward and has lost the connection with the past.

Give me a break...seriously..."lost the connection with the past"??? If you put the two watches next to each other, I guarantee 99% of the population (read: NOT TRF WIS) would be hard pressed to tell the difference (I know I've heard that theme enough from my friends & family members that could care less about watches).

The SubC is another much needed iteration to the classic Sub and finally gets some updates that IMO have been needed for years.

Old Blue · 15 February 2011, 04:20 PM

As with all recent buyers, I had a choice between the old and the new.
The technical enhancements make the new Sub better right off the bat. Much better IMHO.
The larger lugs give it a more masculine look- end of the day, isn't it still supposed to be a tool watch, therefore sort of look like one?
I've read a ton of posts concerning the new Sub versus the old Sub. I know I missed it somewhere but I cannot find anyone mentioning that, just maybe, Rolex spent considerable time and effort deciding what the new Sub would look like. Obviously, I think they hit the mark dead on.
In a couple of years, the new version will be the new "classic". It happened before and has happened again. Standing still is rarely a winning strategy. Kudos to Rolex.

17 January 2011, 12:08 PM	#32
PHDX2 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: John Location: MS & LA Watch: Rolex Day-Date II Posts: 1,084	Perfect look and feel! __________________ - John >>> Rolex & Porsche Owner/Enthusiast <<<

17 January 2011, 04:55 PM	#34
Gerardus "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: Gerardus Location: often in the air Watch: ♕ Posts: 12,142	The lugs are okay! But the classic ones also do have their charmes. __________________ ♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300

17 January 2011, 08:54 PM	#35
Sub'erman "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: SK Location: Greenland Watch: Various SUBs Posts: 473	Daddy likey!!!! __________________ Founder and CEO of the "BLUME" Club Rolex ref: 14060 - 92', 16600- 06', 116610LN 11' In Da House!! He who only loves one woman and one watch, doesn't truly love women or watches!! "Not all that is countable, counts; and not all that counts, is countable"

14 February 2011, 02:52 PM	#44
Rani Drama "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Canada Watch: 116610LN Sub Posts: 427	I like the lugs actually. Makes the watch fit in a little more with the current trend of larger watches while still maintaining the perfect size. __________________

14 February 2011, 08:30 PM	#46
travisb 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Travis Location: FL / NYC Watch: Yes.. Posts: 33,493	I love em.. I was a little skeptical at first but now I can say that it is a terrific addition to the oyster case. The classic design is nice as well but I don't ever see myself going back.

17 January 2011, 12:07 PM	#31
htc8p "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Bert Location: philippines Watch: 116710 ln Posts: 3,472	i like it when its on my wrist it gives a solid feel but i dont like it when its on the dresser or side table. it looks funny and out of proportion

17 January 2011, 03:33 PM	#33
Eric88 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: 88 keys Posts: 2,241	Thanks for all the comments! I still love the older case style, but since the Sub-C is my current daily beater, I've had a lot of time to get used to the new lug style. As many have mentioned, it looks polarizing at first, but it grows on you after awhile. Here are some extreme close-ups of just the lugs and bracelet I took on the beach today. There is actually a very sexy transition between the wide lugs and the bracelet, very much in harmony with the dimensions of the bracelet and the direction of the brushing makes it even more harmonious.

17 January 2011, 10:27 PM	#36
awright102 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: Andy Wright Location: UK Watch: Sea Dweller 16600 Posts: 78	I'm lovin mine. I have the Sub C black and a 16710 GMT black. I switch between both. The new case and braclet does give the watch a more expensive feel. I can't stop looking at mine and i've been wearing it for six months.

17 January 2011, 10:46 PM	#37
Gottog Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: Dave Location: Long Island, NY Posts: 168	The lugs are fine. You won't notice it in real life as much as say... the short hands on the new Explorer

14 February 2011, 01:16 PM	#38
Eric88 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: 88 keys Posts: 2,241	I thought I'd revive this thread after 4 solid months of wearing the Sub-C non-stop. I've started to backslide just a bit on my infatuation with the lugs, particularly now that I've worn short sleeves a few days with warm weather (pretty much frigid winter until a few days ago). Certain angles of the lugs + bracelet are just a little bit over the top, but I still love the watch. I've just started to have a slight yearning for the slimmer lugs of the pre-ceramic. Call me crazy and I'm sure it is just a phase. Anyone with fresh perspective on the thick Sub-C lugs?

14 February 2011, 01:52 PM	#40
psv 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: USA & France Posts: 11,078	No probs here. Then again, since I've got some older Subs and SDs as well I can always switched back/fwd if I like.

14 February 2011, 02:01 PM	#42
bigjon "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: New England Watch: GMT IIC TT, Sub C Posts: 61	I think the lugs go with the case and look proportional. I understand why people love the classic older subs also. But For the price that rolex is now charging, the new case and bracelet seem more substantial.

14 February 2011, 02:20 PM	#43
Sport Rolex "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Ohio Watch: SS GMT II Posts: 11	I had a choice between the two versions when I bought my classic sub TT and went for the slimmer look. Although I do like the other enhancements.

14 February 2011, 08:17 PM	#45
kaiserphoenix "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: London/Tokyo Watch: FPJ CO BL Posts: 1,709	I also love the newer lugs, makes the watch appear more modern and solid (was solid before as well) but "look" is the keyword. I just love this damn watch!!!

14 February 2011, 09:17 PM	#47
Intruder99 Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: England Watch: Milgauss Black Posts: 288	i prefer the classic, the new case is a jump forward and has lost the connection with the past.

15 February 2011, 01:17 AM	#48
bounce Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: kent Posts: 234	I think they suit the watch well, they make it look a bit chunkier which I prefer.

15 February 2011, 01:30 AM	#49
Xpert37 Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: Eli Location: Long Island Watch: 16610 Posts: 117	I said no to the bigger lugs and that was the main reason I settled for the classic 16610, which I think is more refined and balanced watch and looks much better on my wrist. I do understand people's fascination about the maxi dial and the improved bracelet, to me, I don't really mind these updates as the classic sub is what it is, a timeless classic.

15 February 2011, 04:20 PM	#51
Old Blue Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: Ted Location: SF Bay Area Watch: tt Ceramic Sub Posts: 141	As with all recent buyers, I had a choice between the old and the new. The technical enhancements make the new Sub better right off the bat. Much better IMHO. The larger lugs give it a more masculine look- end of the day, isn't it still supposed to be a tool watch, therefore sort of look like one? I've read a ton of posts concerning the new Sub versus the old Sub. I know I missed it somewhere but I cannot find anyone mentioning that, just maybe, Rolex spent considerable time and effort deciding what the new Sub would look like. Obviously, I think they hit the mark dead on. In a couple of years, the new version will be the new "classic". It happened before and has happened again. Standing still is rarely a winning strategy. Kudos to Rolex.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)