ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

equinox308 · 21 February 2011, 09:07 AM

Dear Experts and Rolex FANS- I like to see your feedback and opinions on which one you would buy between the Sub-C 116613 TT in Black Dial or Serti-Black Dial?

I already have a GMT II-C, TT DJ, and WG DJ...I am leaning towards the Serti-dial as it is unique and stands out, however, my issue with this choice is that you would lose 8 lume markers from the diamond markers in their place; whereas with the basic black dial one you get all the lume markers but it looks more or less similar to the dial markers on my GMT..hmmm? what to do??..

HL65 · 21 February 2011, 09:23 AM

Go for it---what the heck-you only live once--diamonds it is!!

Jason71 · 21 February 2011, 09:24 AM

Go serti if you can afford it.

Watchdog · 21 February 2011, 11:50 AM

I was trying on both of those watches yesterday.

There is no doubt in my mind after wearing both for several minutes:

Go with the serti dial. It's not as blingy as the old serti dials on the old subs (the champagne version or slate, for example), but it makes a statement and is tastefully beautiful.

SERTI!

equinox308 · 21 February 2011, 01:01 PM

Thanks for dropping by guys and for the feedback- I am leaning Serti-- and the only hesitation was losing the 8 lume markers (at night) for the 8 diamond markers...I know I know, I dont live in a cave and need all that illumination some of you may say

it's just the thought of having the "full glow"-cool factor in the "non serti" TT that's got me into this see-saw mode as to which one

Much Appreciated Everyone!

JUSTROLEXES · 21 February 2011, 01:53 PM

Bling is good

nch209 · 21 February 2011, 02:31 PM

The NEW serti is sweet! Go for it!!!

timeisfathaoftruth · 21 February 2011, 03:11 PM

From someone who likes YG, WG, and TT (as well as SS) my preference would be to go for the lume (over the diamonds).....I have to cast my vote for the non-serti dial....I guess I like my bling in the metal.....but go for what you like best....good luck!

Gerardus · 21 February 2011, 04:25 PM

Black for me

Singslinger · 21 February 2011, 08:20 PM

Non-serti for me - I love seeing the hour markers light up in the dark!

general · 21 February 2011, 08:31 PM

If I owned a sport model such as GMT II-C, I would go for the Serti.

ingoodtime · 22 February 2011, 01:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kingkongkelley

I was trying on both of those watches yesterday.

There is no doubt in my mind after wearing both for several minutes:

Go with the serti dial. It's not as blingy as the old serti dials on the old subs (the champagne version or slate, for example), but it makes a statement and is tastefully beautiful.

SERTI!

I own the slate serti dial on my tt sub and like it vey much. The new ones don't excite me as much. Even though they now have larger diamonds, the blending of the bezel/dial colors seems to take away from the fact that you have a diamond Rolex. Some will appreciate the more understated look, some won't.

AK40DJ50 · 22 February 2011, 01:15 AM

The Serti dial adds understated elegance - sounds like a good choice.

RRGHOST1 · 22 February 2011, 02:41 AM

Not fussed on diamonds,especially on Sports watches.

dsio · 22 February 2011, 02:43 AM

If you're already going TT, the new serti does look great, so why not!

EchoBlueUK · 22 February 2011, 05:15 AM

Serti - the gold lettering looks better than white too.

equinox308 · 22 February 2011, 06:31 AM

Thanks again for dropping by and the input guys!! This is a close race based on the "poll" and a tough one to decide

Quote:

Originally Posted by Singslinger

Non-serti for me - I love seeing the hour markers light up in the dark!

equinox308 · 22 February 2011, 06:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by general

If I owned a sport model such as GMT II-C, I would go for the Serti.

My same thoughts

equinox308 · 22 February 2011, 04:04 PM

Poll still open and is currently tied-BUMP

hfchoi · 22 February 2011, 06:34 PM

I got the GMT II c too and I saving up for the sub TT serti!

equinox308 · 22 February 2011, 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hfchoi

I got the GMT II c too and I saving up for the sub TT serti!

Thanks hf!!..do you recommend any places in HK for best prices, we may be going there soon ;-) Would you happen to know how much the 116613 black serti is going for in HK? (feel free to PM if that's better for you)..thanks again!

hfchoi · 22 February 2011, 06:43 PM

I've only ever seen it in one AD in causeway bay going for around HK$105000 if I remember correctly before the price increase. You should be able to get 5-8% off. Definitely cheaper to get it off one of the sellers on this forum if they can source one.

equinox308 · 22 February 2011, 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hfchoi

I've only ever seen it in one AD in causeway bay going for around HK$105000 if I remember correctly before the price increase. You should be able to get 5-8% off. Definitely cheaper to get it off one of the sellers on this forum if they can source one.

Good to know on HK price and location, thanks again hfc..

Agreed on TRF sellers for the 116613--I'm just hesitant spending that much on something I do not get to actually see/inspect first (if you know what I mean)

dddrees · 22 February 2011, 08:23 PM

I would stay in the light and get the serti myself.

equinox308 · 25 February 2011, 06:48 PM

Thanks everyone for stopping by to vote and leaving your feedback!..now my search begins =) Happy WATCHING'

swatty · 25 February 2011, 06:50 PM

Sorry but I'm not a diamond guy

Mystro · 26 February 2011, 12:09 AM

Rolex lume sucks anyway. Diamonds sparkle enough in most light. Serti is super rare and you will never see one in the wild. If you ever saw a Serti Sub in the sunlight, you would never ask which watch to buy.

psv · 26 February 2011, 01:09 AM

Diamonds don't belong on a men's watch and certainly not a diver IMO.

But hey, it is makes you sing, I'm all for it! :-)

SUPERDOC · 26 February 2011, 01:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EchoBlueUK

Serti - the gold lettering looks better than white too.

I agree - not only that , but the Gold frame around the date window is very subtle, yet very significant in my opinion..

It really brings the whole dial up a notch..

I went with the Basic black before ever having a chance to see the Serti - now I'm debating sending mine in to Rolex for a switch...

Dan2010 · 26 February 2011, 02:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by psv

Diamonds don't belong on a men's watch and certainly not a diver IMO.

But hey, it is makes you sing, I'm all for it! :-)

BINGO!

View Poll Results: SERTI BLACK Dial 116613 SUB-C TT or NON-Serti Dial??
SERTI black DIAL	27	48.21%
Non-Serti black Dial	29	51.79%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 56. You may not vote on this poll

21 February 2011, 09:07 AM	#1
equinox308 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: CA Posts: 76	116613 Black TT- To SERTI DIAL or Not to Serti..? Dear Experts and Rolex FANS- I like to see your feedback and opinions on which one you would buy between the Sub-C 116613 TT in Black Dial or Serti-Black Dial? I already have a GMT II-C, TT DJ, and WG DJ...I am leaning towards the Serti-dial as it is unique and stands out, however, my issue with this choice is that you would lose 8 lume markers from the diamond markers in their place; whereas with the basic black dial one you get all the lume markers but it looks more or less similar to the dial markers on my GMT..hmmm? what to do??.. Last edited by equinox308; 21 February 2011 at 09:10 AM.. Reason: spelling

21 February 2011, 09:23 AM	#2
HL65 TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Ken Location: SW Florida Watch: One on my wrist. Posts: 64,006	Go for it---what the heck-you only live once--diamonds it is!! __________________ *SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT*

21 February 2011, 09:24 AM	#3
Jason71 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Jason Location: USA Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers Posts: 7,973	Go serti if you can afford it. __________________ Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY

21 February 2011, 01:53 PM	#6
JUSTROLEXES ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 2024 SubLV41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Tony Geha Location: San Diego, CA Watch: Yacht-Master Posts: 51,110	Bling is good __________________ Instagram @JustRolexes 2FA security active

21 February 2011, 11:50 AM	#4
Watchdog "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Junkyard Dog Location: The Doghouse Watch: I can't tell time Posts: 6,822	I was trying on both of those watches yesterday. There is no doubt in my mind after wearing both for several minutes: Go with the serti dial. It's not as blingy as the old serti dials on the old subs (the champagne version or slate, for example), but it makes a statement and is tastefully beautiful. SERTI!

21 February 2011, 01:01 PM	#5
equinox308 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: CA Posts: 76	Thanks for dropping by guys and for the feedback- I am leaning Serti-- and the only hesitation was losing the 8 lume markers (at night) for the 8 diamond markers...I know I know, I dont live in a cave and need all that illumination some of you may say it's just the thought of having the "full glow"-cool factor in the "non serti" TT that's got me into this see-saw mode as to which one Much Appreciated Everyone!

21 February 2011, 02:31 PM	#7
nch209 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Nathan Location: Northern Virginia Posts: 2,775	The NEW serti is sweet! Go for it!!! __________________ nch209

21 February 2011, 03:11 PM	#8
timeisfathaoftruth "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Ed Location: New England Watch: Sub,Daytona,GMT,YM Posts: 997	From someone who likes YG, WG, and TT (as well as SS) my preference would be to go for the lume (over the diamonds).....I have to cast my vote for the non-serti dial....I guess I like my bling in the metal.....but go for what you like best....good luck! __________________ Time and tide wait for no man...

21 February 2011, 04:25 PM	#9
Gerardus "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: Gerardus Location: often in the air Watch: ♕ Posts: 12,142	Black for me __________________ ♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300

21 February 2011, 08:20 PM	#10
Singslinger "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: singapore Posts: 6,424	Non-serti for me - I love seeing the hour markers light up in the dark!

21 February 2011, 08:31 PM	#11
general "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Earth Posts: 723	If I owned a sport model such as GMT II-C, I would go for the Serti.

22 February 2011, 01:15 AM	#13
AK40DJ50 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: Tom Location: Toronto, Canada Posts: 1,506	The Serti dial adds understated elegance - sounds like a good choice. __________________ Datejust II 116333 Submariner 116610LN

22 February 2011, 02:41 AM	#14
RRGHOST1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: luke standing Location: england Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue Posts: 3,997	Not fussed on diamonds,especially on Sports watches.

22 February 2011, 02:43 AM	#15
dsio "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2010 Real Name: Ashley Location: Brisbane Watch: Rolex Sub 1680 '79 Posts: 2,301	If you're already going TT, the new serti does look great, so why not! __________________ -- Omega Seamaster Grand-Lux Stepped Pie-Pan 14K Gold OJ2627 '53 -- -- Omega Cal 320 Chronograph 18K Gold OT2872 '58 -- -- Omega Cal 321 Speedmaster Pro 145.012 '67 -- -- Rolex Submariner 1680 "Ghost" '79 -- -- Rolex SS Daytona 116520 '04 --

22 February 2011, 05:15 AM	#16
EchoBlueUK "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: UK Posts: 1,543	Serti - the gold lettering looks better than white too.

22 February 2011, 04:04 PM	#19
equinox308 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: CA Posts: 76	Poll still open and is currently tied-BUMP

22 February 2011, 06:34 PM	#20
hfchoi Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: HK Posts: 50	I got the GMT II c too and I saving up for the sub TT serti!

22 February 2011, 06:43 PM	#22
hfchoi Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: HK Posts: 50	I've only ever seen it in one AD in causeway bay going for around HK$105000 if I remember correctly before the price increase. You should be able to get 5-8% off. Definitely cheaper to get it off one of the sellers on this forum if they can source one.

22 February 2011, 08:23 PM	#24
dddrees "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: Dan Location: USA Watch: This N That Posts: 34,253	I would stay in the light and get the serti myself. __________________ When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

25 February 2011, 06:48 PM	#25
equinox308 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: CA Posts: 76	Thanks everyone for stopping by to vote and leaving your feedback!..now my search begins =) Happy WATCHING'

25 February 2011, 06:50 PM	#26
swatty 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Peter Location: Sydney Watch: The Game Posts: 17,415	Sorry but I'm not a diamond guy

26 February 2011, 12:09 AM	#27
Mystro 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: The Mystro ;) Location: Central Pa. Posts: 15,510	Rolex lume sucks anyway. Diamonds sparkle enough in most light. Serti is super rare and you will never see one in the wild. If you ever saw a Serti Sub in the sunlight, you would never ask which watch to buy.

26 February 2011, 01:09 AM	#28
psv 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: USA & France Posts: 11,078	Diamonds don't belong on a men's watch and certainly not a diver IMO. But hey, it is makes you sing, I'm all for it! :-)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)