ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

np2010 · 27 April 2011, 04:14 AM

I just got back from an AD that had both the DeepSea and new sub in stock. I love the look and feel of both watches when I tried both on. I have always loved the Deepsea from pictures and when I put it on in person was shocked at how stunning and good it felt on my wrist like a mini tank. I am just worried about the weight/bulk of the Deepsea as a daily wearer even though I have other watches to rotate. The new sub felt great also but just a bit small coming from my 42 mm Omega PO. So what are the pros and cons from those who have both? I am leaning more towards the Deepsea at this point. Thanks

gqllc · 27 April 2011, 04:50 AM

I found that for an everyday watch the Sub C was more practical for me. The Deep sea was just a bit too thick and heavy for my liking.

jizeal · 27 April 2011, 06:11 AM

SUB C. It feels a lot better on the wrist then the clunky Deep Sea overtime. The SUB is always a classic piece as well. Can I ask what else you have in your collection?

Abid · 27 April 2011, 06:21 AM

If you can get used to the weight and height of the deepsea over long periods of time then go for it. Personally I couldn't do it, it just looks silly on my wrist. The only problem might arise is when you actually start wearing the watch on a continues bases and realize its quit uncomfortable. I believe thats what happened to another member here on the forum who couldn't deal with the size of the watch after a year and sold it and purchased the SUB C. But if the Deepsea sings to you then thats one you'll have to get.

z32turbo · 27 April 2011, 06:27 AM

I also found the Sub-C to be a much more enjoyable watch for daily wear. The DSSD is great but hard for me to justify for everyday.

George Ab · 27 April 2011, 06:29 AM

I loved the looked of the Deepsea. It was comfortable on my wrist and looked great. However, after spending a few months with the watch; I had to throw it back into the sea. It was a combination of the weight and height off of the wrist. Definitely not a watch you want to go running with. That said, many people love them.

DCgator · 27 April 2011, 07:50 AM

I say Go Deep!

rolexertion · 27 April 2011, 08:04 AM

Sub every time.

nauticajoe · 27 April 2011, 08:12 AM

Another vote for the SubC.

acadianl79 · 27 April 2011, 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DCgator

I say Go Deep!

+1

As a proud owner of a Deepsea myself .( for over a year now ), all i have to say is that it was the
best purchase i ever made. No regrets at all

MB7000 · 27 April 2011, 09:00 AM

I love my deep sea ! it was a everyday watch for about 4 months now it in a rotation. If you have a wrist over 7" you should have no problems with it as a daily wearer.

sleddog · 27 April 2011, 09:08 AM

This seems to be a common question lately......

If you find you can get past the weight and height of the DSSD (as this is always a downside for most!), then you will undoubtedly love it....
If you feel it will to be overpowering, go the Subc!

Both are wonderful watches, and either is great choice IMO.!

Patekpete · 27 April 2011, 10:06 AM

I just got my DSSD.

There's no other Rollie that would give you the presence the DSSD does. Period. But that comes at a price as everyone here mentioned.

If you can deal with the weight as a daily beater then go for it. But remember it weighs 220gms. A PAM Luminor weighs 120gms. Go figure.

I am now looking to buy a SubC. Will I sell my DSSD? Probably not.

Michael M. · 27 April 2011, 10:09 AM

For a every day watch, my vote is for the SubC!

MortgageGuy · 27 April 2011, 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by George Ab

I loved the looked of the Deepsea. It was comfortable on my wrist and looked great. However, after spending a few months with the watch; I had to throw it back into the sea. It was a combination of the weight and height off of the wrist. Definitely not a watch you want to go running with. That said, many people love them.

That about sums it up for me too and I have had 2 of them

I would choose the Sub C

paddy_crow · 27 April 2011, 10:21 AM

The SubC is too big for my taste, the DSSD isn't anywhere close to the ballpark.

Jannal · 27 April 2011, 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gqllc

I found that for an everyday watch the Sub C was more practical for me. The Deep sea was just a bit too thick and heavy for my liking.

Dan2010 · 27 April 2011, 10:39 AM

Sub C

Manofsteelpt · 27 April 2011, 10:56 AM

DSSD all the way!!! Congrats on your purchase!

stockae92 · 27 April 2011, 11:08 AM

IMO, if you want to wear it everyday and you wear shirt/tie/suit everyday, then go with Sub C

otherwise if you still think you can live with the size and weight everyday, then go with DSSD

Annabell · 27 April 2011, 12:29 PM

To me, it was not so much the weight as the height. If the watch had 2/3 the height it would be perfect to me.

CoachRolexRyan · 27 April 2011, 12:46 PM

The Deep Sea is in a league all it's own. People go on and on about it's height and weight.
Give me a break guys and grow some b***s. It's a watch. As far as comfort goes the more you wear it, the more comfortable it gets. What I like about the watch is the weight and the height. Absolutely awesome. I would NEVER part with my DSSD!

rohardi · 27 April 2011, 02:01 PM

This week I was thinking about a Deep Sea, but for just a little more I was able to pick up a SS Sub 116610LN and a Breitling super avenger with a white face. I originally wanted a Sub, then I saw the deep sea and loved it. But when I did the math I was able to to do the classic sub which I have always loved, AND a beast of a Breitling at 48mm wide and 18mm tall for about $1200 more than the deep sea would have cost by it's self. Food For thought best of both wolds?.?.?.?

mgpdragon64 · 27 April 2011, 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nauticajoe

Another vote for the SubC.

+1 here

bondtoys · 27 April 2011, 06:26 PM

Another vote for the Sub C.
Before buying it, I gave the DSSD a last chance and knew immediately what to choose.

dddrees · 27 April 2011, 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleddog

this seems to be a common question lately......

If you find you can get past the weight and height of the dssd (as this is always a downside for most!), then you will undoubtedly love it....
If you feel it will to be overpowering, go the subc!

Both are wonderful watches, and either is great choice imo.!

x2

Darlinboy · 27 April 2011, 07:47 PM

SubC for me, fits the bill.

SWIMPRUF · 27 April 2011, 08:00 PM

Sub C hands down.

SeamasterGMT · 27 April 2011, 09:30 PM

For me, I like the Deepsea more:

Domed crystal
Markers to 60 on the bezel
Glidelock clasp (no, they're not the same)
No cyclops

plus

as you can see here, the Sub is more popular, in fact, the MOST popular Rolex. Hence they are everywhere. Don't get me wrong, the new SubC is a brilliant watch and if you asked SubC or ...insert any other Rolex here..., I would say "SubC". However, in this case, go for the Deepsea.

psv · 27 April 2011, 09:45 PM

If it is an only/everyday watch the choice is easy - SubC.

If you are tall/large guy, do a fair amount of diving/exploration, the DSSD becomes a fun and cool piece. Total overkill.

27 April 2011, 04:14 AM	#1
np2010 Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Ohio Watch: Rolex, AP, Omega Posts: 17	Sub Date 116610LN or Deepsea? I just got back from an AD that had both the DeepSea and new sub in stock. I love the look and feel of both watches when I tried both on. I have always loved the Deepsea from pictures and when I put it on in person was shocked at how stunning and good it felt on my wrist like a mini tank. I am just worried about the weight/bulk of the Deepsea as a daily wearer even though I have other watches to rotate. The new sub felt great also but just a bit small coming from my 42 mm Omega PO. So what are the pros and cons from those who have both? I am leaning more towards the Deepsea at this point. Thanks

27 April 2011, 04:50 AM	#2
gqllc "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: Steve Location: Albany NY Watch: Blue Bezel SubC Posts: 1,511	I found that for an everyday watch the Sub C was more practical for me. The Deep sea was just a bit too thick and heavy for my liking. __________________ K-TT Datejust, Random Blue Bezel SubC

27 April 2011, 06:27 AM	#5
z32turbo "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Sea Level Watch: Varies Posts: 6,877	I also found the Sub-C to be a much more enjoyable watch for daily wear. The DSSD is great but hard for me to justify for everyday. __________________ Instagram @z32turbo

27 April 2011, 06:29 AM	#6
George Ab "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: George Location: Seattle Watch: One of Them Posts: 6,924	I loved the looked of the Deepsea. It was comfortable on my wrist and looked great. However, after spending a few months with the watch; I had to throw it back into the sea. It was a combination of the weight and height off of the wrist. Definitely not a watch you want to go running with. That said, many people love them. __________________

27 April 2011, 09:08 AM	#12
sleddog TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Rob Location: Nearby. Posts: 24,931	This seems to be a common question lately...... If you find you can get past the weight and height of the DSSD (as this is always a downside for most!), then you will undoubtedly love it.... If you feel it will to be overpowering, go the Subc! Both are wonderful watches, and either is great choice IMO.! __________________ He who wears a Rolex is always on time, even when late!! TRF's "After Dark" Bar & Nightclub Patron-Founding Member..

27 April 2011, 06:11 AM	#3
jizeal "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: Neil Location: South Florida Watch: neilswatches@gmail Posts: 5,157	SUB C. It feels a lot better on the wrist then the clunky Deep Sea overtime. The SUB is always a classic piece as well. Can I ask what else you have in your collection?

27 April 2011, 06:21 AM	#4
Abid "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Las Vegas, NV Watch: 16610LV Posts: 466	If you can get used to the weight and height of the deepsea over long periods of time then go for it. Personally I couldn't do it, it just looks silly on my wrist. The only problem might arise is when you actually start wearing the watch on a continues bases and realize its quit uncomfortable. I believe thats what happened to another member here on the forum who couldn't deal with the size of the watch after a year and sold it and purchased the SUB C. But if the Deepsea sings to you then thats one you'll have to get.

27 April 2011, 07:50 AM	#7
DCgator "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: PNW Watch: DS,BLNR,SubLV,DJ2 Posts: 8,123	I say Go Deep!

27 April 2011, 08:04 AM	#8
rolexertion Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Montreal, PQ Posts: 722	Sub every time.

27 April 2011, 08:12 AM	#9
nauticajoe "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Joe Location: PA Posts: 14,774	Another vote for the SubC.

27 April 2011, 09:00 AM	#11
MB7000 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Marcus Location: Chicago Watch: Day-Date,Deepsea Posts: 266	I love my deep sea ! it was a everyday watch for about 4 months now it in a rotation. If you have a wrist over 7" you should have no problems with it as a daily wearer.

27 April 2011, 10:06 AM	#13
Patekpete Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Manila Posts: 23	I just got my DSSD. There's no other Rollie that would give you the presence the DSSD does. Period. But that comes at a price as everyone here mentioned. If you can deal with the weight as a daily beater then go for it. But remember it weighs 220gms. A PAM Luminor weighs 120gms. Go figure. I am now looking to buy a SubC. Will I sell my DSSD? Probably not.

27 April 2011, 10:09 AM	#14
Michael M. Banned Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Newport Beach, CA Posts: 8,391	For a every day watch, my vote is for the SubC!

27 April 2011, 10:21 AM	#16
paddy_crow Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Michigan Posts: 592	The SubC is too big for my taste, the DSSD isn't anywhere close to the ballpark.

27 April 2011, 10:39 AM	#18
Dan2010 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: South Carolina Watch: Panerai 914 Posts: 6,540	Sub C

27 April 2011, 10:56 AM	#19
Manofsteelpt "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Real Name: Mike Location: Buffalo, NY Posts: 3,971	DSSD all the way!!! Congrats on your purchase!

27 April 2011, 11:08 AM	#20
stockae92 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Socal Posts: 4,964	IMO, if you want to wear it everyday and you wear shirt/tie/suit everyday, then go with Sub C otherwise if you still think you can live with the size and weight everyday, then go with DSSD

27 April 2011, 12:29 PM	#21
Annabell Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Real Name: Dr. Fisher Location: Jackson, TN Watch: Tag Monaco Posts: 79	To me, it was not so much the weight as the height. If the watch had 2/3 the height it would be perfect to me.

27 April 2011, 12:46 PM	#22
CoachRolexRyan "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: Coach Location: Boston Watch: Rolex Deep Sea Posts: 1,297	The Deep Sea is in a league all it's own. People go on and on about it's height and weight. Give me a break guys and grow some b***s. It's a watch. As far as comfort goes the more you wear it, the more comfortable it gets. What I like about the watch is the weight and the height. Absolutely awesome. I would NEVER part with my DSSD!

27 April 2011, 02:01 PM	#23
rohardi "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Rhode Island USA Watch: 116610LN, 216570 Posts: 787	This week I was thinking about a Deep Sea, but for just a little more I was able to pick up a SS Sub 116610LN and a Breitling super avenger with a white face. I originally wanted a Sub, then I saw the deep sea and loved it. But when I did the math I was able to to do the classic sub which I have always loved, AND a beast of a Breitling at 48mm wide and 18mm tall for about $1200 more than the deep sea would have cost by it's self. Food For thought best of both wolds?.?.?.?

27 April 2011, 06:26 PM	#25
bondtoys "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: World Watch: 16750 Posts: 2,733	Another vote for the Sub C. Before buying it, I gave the DSSD a last chance and knew immediately what to choose.

27 April 2011, 07:47 PM	#27
Darlinboy 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Real Name: DB Location: :noitacoL Watch: :hctaW Posts: 6,703	SubC for me, fits the bill. __________________ Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.

27 April 2011, 08:00 PM	#28
SWIMPRUF "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: * Posts: 2,323	Sub C hands down. __________________ Member# 52,675 Est. 3/2011

27 April 2011, 09:30 PM	#29
SeamasterGMT Banned Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: USA Watch: DeepSea Posts: 822	For me, I like the Deepsea more: Domed crystal Markers to 60 on the bezel Glidelock clasp (no, they're not the same) No cyclops plus as you can see here, the Sub is more popular, in fact, the MOST popular Rolex. Hence they are everywhere. Don't get me wrong, the new SubC is a brilliant watch and if you asked SubC or ...insert any other Rolex here..., I would say "SubC". However, in this case, go for the Deepsea.

27 April 2011, 09:45 PM	#30
psv 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: USA & France Posts: 11,078	If it is an only/everyday watch the choice is easy - SubC. If you are tall/large guy, do a fair amount of diving/exploration, the DSSD becomes a fun and cool piece. Total overkill.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 10 (0 members and 10 guests)