The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11 May 2011, 12:34 PM   #31
Abid
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 466
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yeubs76 View Post
Ok guys making my first move into rolex
I have a question
I am going to buy this watch for me because I like it but.

How is the explorer perceived by the rolex community
Is it the poor mans rolex

Or is it a credible tool watch

Thoughts
Don't understand why that would even matter? Wear what you like, not what other think.
Abid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2011, 12:35 PM   #32
Rollie2011
"TRF" Member
 
Rollie2011's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: John
Location: Palm Beach, FL
Watch: Sub-C + Exp 42
Posts: 1,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by etp095 View Post
Yes the current Exp 2 will be discontinued,it's not listed in the new price list that came out.new expy 2 $7750usd.
Thats a shame...

I really like what Rolex did with the new one though....

It sets it apart from the Sub and GMT
Rollie2011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2011, 12:52 PM   #33
Atomant
"TRF" Member
 
Atomant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Fernwood
Posts: 3,455
Quote:
Originally Posted by UJU View Post
Yes it is.
Right up there with the rest.
And the best
__________________
116613LN 16600SD 16610LV 116710 16710 16570 Speedy 3570.50 PAM25 Oris TT1 and a bunch of G-Shocks. Flipped: Daytona 116520 Seamaster 2231.80
Atomant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2011, 01:17 PM   #34
rolexsweep
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia
Watch: RG DD40
Posts: 1,149
Quote:
Originally Posted by usbzoso View Post
"Poor mans Rolex" is an oxymoron haha
hahahaha

a rolex is a rolex... the exp 2 is an all time classic.
__________________
"Did you get that at retail?"
rolexsweep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2011, 04:10 PM   #35
Explorador
"TRF" Member
 
Explorador's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Switzerland
Watch: 16710LN,PO 8900
Posts: 227
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yeubs76 View Post
Ok guys making my first move into rolex
I have a question
I am going to buy this watch for me because I like it but.

How is the explorer perceived by the rolex community
Is it the poor mans rolex

Or is it a credible tool watch

Thoughts
Hi Yeubs

If you are interested in some deeper information about the new ex ii, I strongly recommend you THE EX II thread. There you learn about the past, present and future of this magnificent watch. So you may find the answer for yourself.

Who knows, you may end up like me, saving URGENTLY to get the current exii (3186 bd), as long as they are on store, and giving me time to save quietly for the 216570 (new exii), which will still be around for some time.

The current exii is more than just a good inversion, it has a certain magic that we all try to put into words in forums but we fail.

Whichever, enjoy your new Rolex.
Explorador is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2011, 04:25 PM   #36
Explorador
"TRF" Member
 
Explorador's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Switzerland
Watch: 16710LN,PO 8900
Posts: 227
The ex ii enigma - not THE EX II thread, sorry.
Explorador is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2011, 04:58 PM   #37
skyedog
"TRF" Member
 
skyedog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Joey
Location: around the Bay
Watch: ing TRF
Posts: 1,942
skyedog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2011, 05:00 PM   #38
Richard.
"TRF" Member
 
Richard.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 969
OK, the current Explorer II is less popular in the wider world than it is among the community here (although of course, for those that choose to wear one, it's very popular with them and that's all that matters). I suspect that the new 42mm will continue that trend because the differences in the case design compared to the GMT IIc and Sub.c are too subtle to make much difference to the average buyer but appear to make the new watch much more attractive to aficionados.
__________________
A father is someone who carries photographs in his wallet - where his money used to be.
Richard. is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2011, 05:01 PM   #39
skyedog
"TRF" Member
 
skyedog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Joey
Location: around the Bay
Watch: ing TRF
Posts: 1,942
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard. View Post
OK, the current Explorer II is less popular in the wider world than it is among the community here (although of course, for those that choose to wear one, it's very popular with them and that's all that matters). I suspect that the new 42mm will continue that trend because the differences in the case design compared to the GMT IIc and Sub.c are too subtle to make much difference to the average buyer but appear to make the new watch much more attractive to aficionados.
well said
skyedog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2011, 05:02 PM   #40
valentine
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Justin
Location: Baltimore, MD
Watch: TT Diamond DJ
Posts: 2,809
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
C'mon... A poor mans Rolex is an Omega........


the Explorer II has never been in that category.... It holds value better and retails for more than the extremely popular Datejust SS models seen in every boardroom and on top management around the world...

The new Explorer II 42 should prove to be even more popular..
omega..I almost spit out my drink... can always count on you larry!
valentine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 May 2011, 11:04 PM   #41
Bukfenc
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rollie2011 View Post
I think this big fuss about 2mm is really ridiculous....
Absolutely right. E.g. Omega SMP with its 41mm case looks a much bigger watch than a standard Sub. Why? Bigger markers, fatter hands, and more importantly non-tapering metal bracelet. Patek Aquanaut Jumbo (40mm) looks also much bigger just because of the (again) non-tapering bracelet. I think Rolex should have reduced the tapering of their metal bracelet and that would make watches more proportional and trendy. (I think ideal would be a bracelet size like Omega Speedy Pro ... 20 mm at lugs, tapers down to 18 mm at clasp, and clasp width is 20mm again).
Bukfenc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 May 2011, 11:17 PM   #42
watchf
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,458
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yeubs76 View Post
the rolex community
Is it the poor mans rolex

Thoughts
With the expected price even though the current model is not a cheap watch before by any stretch, just not as expensive as other watches offered by Rolex.

Quote:
Or is it a credible tool watch
It is certainly a credible watch but to me personally a watch of that price is not a tool watch rather an everyday watch. By not a tool watch to me I mean I wouldn't wield, built a house, service a car, chop wood, paint etc. while wearing.
watchf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 May 2011, 11:25 PM   #43
learpilot
"TRF" Member
 
learpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: gary
Location: Naples,FL
Watch: TT GMTII ,SUB c,
Posts: 337
Can't wait to try one on
learpilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.