ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
2 June 2011, 12:39 AM | #31 |
Liar & Ratbag
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Renato
Location: NYC / Miami Beach
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 5,344
|
Honestly, the watch does look too big for your wrist IMO. The lugs look like they're going beyond your wrist. Is that correct? If so, I would sell it and get something you're going to love on and off your wrist
|
2 June 2011, 01:43 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Dalip
Location: Mumbai and Perth
Watch: Rolex PAM Omega
Posts: 18,656
|
We all make mistakes. I agree...it looks good on you. But when you're not happy it's tough to see your way back. Don't be too hasty. Is there something else you want? Look at a trade perhaps.
__________________
------------------------------------------------------------ "The liar's punishment is not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else." George Bernard Shaw |
2 June 2011, 01:44 PM | #33 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Will
Location: Colorado USA
Posts: 556
|
It's a great looking watch.
How about a different perspective on the wrist shot? I think wrist shots taken from the wearer's point of view always make the watch look larger.
For example, here is my 36mm Turn-o-graph with the common wrist shot. It actually looks BIG in this picture (to me) But here's how the rest of the world sees my watch. It definitely does not look big in this picture |
2 June 2011, 02:39 PM | #34 | |
Liar & Ratbag
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Renato
Location: NYC / Miami Beach
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 5,344
|
Quote:
|
|
2 June 2011, 11:23 PM | #35 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Will
Location: Colorado USA
Posts: 556
|
|
3 June 2011, 05:58 AM | #36 |
Liar & Ratbag
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Renato
Location: NYC / Miami Beach
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 5,344
|
I didn't miss the point. I understand it very well but my comment was to indicate that your watch, regardless of the pic, looks like exactly like what it is--- a 36mm watch. The OP's watch is a monster and requires a pretty large wrist to pull off no matter what angle you look at it. Are you suggesting the OP wear the watch and step back anytime someone wants to look at it so it appears smaller?
|
3 June 2011, 07:22 AM | #37 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Will
Location: Colorado USA
Posts: 556
|
|
3 June 2011, 01:51 PM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Canada
Watch: Air-King 114200
Posts: 2,878
|
I think it looks fine.
|
3 June 2011, 02:50 PM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: aroundtheworld
Watch: SS Daytona - BLACK
Posts: 2,261
|
i think it looks great! u just might be a bit too overly self-conscious about it...it's a large watch, but it looks liek u can pull it off....plus, i think after having that on the wrist for a month....u won't be able to go back to anything smaller lol
__________________
116520 Black - 116500 White - 116713LN - 116613LB - Panerai 389 - Chopard Mille Miglia GMT Chronograph - Chopard LUC Sport 2000 - Moser Pioneer Centre Seconds |
3 June 2011, 10:58 PM | #40 |
Liar & Ratbag
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Renato
Location: NYC / Miami Beach
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 5,344
|
|
3 June 2011, 11:33 PM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: rudolph
Location: chicago burbs
Posts: 2,026
|
I too think it's to big for your wrist,I agree the lugs look like they extend more than the wrist.It's a nice watch,I kinda like the big 9-3.
__________________
tt date circa 69' 5513 circa 81' ss sub w/date (z) pepsi gmt for dad(D) polar expy II(z) 1675 gmt circa 68' ladies datejust on jubilee for mom (z) sea dweller16600(M) SS Sub-C(g) Omega Planet Ocean,45.5 on mesh(2500D) |
4 June 2011, 12:44 AM | #42 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 801
|
Quote:
Good luck |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.