ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Vipes · 29 June 2011, 03:34 AM

Hi all,

TRF newbie here looking for some advice. I recently sold my Explorer II so I'm looking for my next Rolex. I am considering the sea-dweller and the subC. I am drawn to the sd b/c of the more classic design and I like the date w/o the cyclops. I also like the new subC for the improvements esp. the bracelet. I've never tried on the sd so can members comment on the thickness and weight of the sd compared to the subC? Pics of the two together would be really helpful. Also any general comments on either one would be welcome. Thanks for the help!v

texex91 · 29 June 2011, 04:05 AM

Sub-C. Period.

perpetualman88 · 29 June 2011, 04:10 AM

SUB-C end of story ha, the sea-sweller is thicker than the sub C

TSW · 29 June 2011, 04:18 AM

Tough one! But you really can't go wrong with a Sub.

HL65 · 29 June 2011, 04:25 AM

I would suggest trying both on. They are both quite nice and you can't go wrong with either IMHO.

JUSTROLEXES · 29 June 2011, 04:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteelerFan65

I would suggest trying both on. They are both quite nice and you can't go wrong with either IMHO.

Well said Ken

Both watches are great

Vipes · 29 June 2011, 04:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteelerFan65

I would suggest trying both on. They are both quite nice and you can't go wrong with either IMHO.

Yea, that would be best but I don't know anyone with a sd and none of my ADs have them. If anyone has pics of the two side by side, that would be very helpful.

29 June 2011, 03:34 AM	#1
Vipes "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Texas Posts: 4,913	Need some advice, please Hi all, TRF newbie here looking for some advice. I recently sold my Explorer II so I'm looking for my next Rolex. I am considering the sea-dweller and the subC. I am drawn to the sd b/c of the more classic design and I like the date w/o the cyclops. I also like the new subC for the improvements esp. the bracelet. I've never tried on the sd so can members comment on the thickness and weight of the sd compared to the subC? Pics of the two together would be really helpful. Also any general comments on either one would be welcome. Thanks for the help!v

29 June 2011, 04:18 AM	#4
TSW "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: TSW Location: Le Brassus Watch: Rolex & AP's Posts: 27,449	Tough one! But you really can't go wrong with a Sub. __________________ AP Owners Club IG @swiss.watch.connection

29 June 2011, 04:25 AM	#5
HL65 TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Ken Location: SW Florida Watch: One on my wrist. Posts: 64,009	I would suggest trying both on. They are both quite nice and you can't go wrong with either IMHO. __________________ *SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT*

29 June 2011, 04:05 AM	#2
texex91 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: . Posts: 17,898	Sub-C. Period.

29 June 2011, 04:10 AM	#3
perpetualman88 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Real Name: David Farkas Location: Los Angeles Watch: 116610, 5712/1A Posts: 8,182	SUB-C end of story ha, the sea-sweller is thicker than the sub C

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)