ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
7 August 2011, 09:19 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Mexico
Watch: 116610-LV
Posts: 704
|
fitment
I honestly think the 16610 fits a hell of a lot better on the wrist then the new 116610's.
With that being said, I would still get the 116610 upgrade in a HEARTBEAT! Do it if you can. |
7 August 2011, 09:24 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: 88 keys
Posts: 2,241
|
You may like to read this thread
You will probably benefit from this one as well If it were me, I'd sell the 16610 to get a 16600 |
7 August 2011, 09:59 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sea Level
Watch: Varies
Posts: 6,877
|
I'd do it in a heartbeat as well. I much prefer the ceramic model to the non. Try it on before you decide based on any pics.
__________________
Instagram @z32turbo |
7 August 2011, 01:11 PM | #34 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: USA
Watch: Sea Dweller 16600
Posts: 63
|
Quote:
|
|
7 August 2011, 01:14 PM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: 88 keys
Posts: 2,241
|
|
7 August 2011, 01:50 PM | #36 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: London
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 168
|
The 16610 is dead, long live the 116610
|
7 August 2011, 02:01 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Michael
Location: Midwest-USA
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,942
|
I Love my 16610
|
7 August 2011, 07:03 PM | #38 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: U.K
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 121
|
I've had the 16610 and without a shadow of a doubt prefer the 116610 however your sub is quite a special one in my opinion as it is one of the last to be made but to me the solid bracelet and new shape of the case are far better.
|
7 August 2011, 10:42 PM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Jerry
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 827
|
If you must have the newer watch for some reason or another . . . go for it, the sub C is a great watch. However, if your sub is in good, sound condition don't upgrade just to get the newer watch. The old style sub is a great watch as well and will serve you for many, many more years. I'm fortunate enough to own one of each but I'd never get rid of either as each has its own unique appeal.
|
8 August 2011, 12:08 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Mark
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,078
|
I'd do it, the upgrades are wonderful!
|
8 August 2011, 10:04 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,937
|
Guys, have not been on in a while. Looks like fairly few ceramic LN's for sale on the Sale section. Is that an indication of the LN being more in demand in decent months?
|
8 August 2011, 10:11 AM | #42 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: Tissot
Posts: 1,454
|
The Sub Cs are gathering dust in AD's windows around here. Meanwhile, the price of s/h 16610s is increasing nicely. I know which I prefer ;-)
|
8 August 2011, 11:13 AM | #43 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Honey Rider
Location: San Diego
Watch: Rolex Sub C 116610
Posts: 143
|
Quote:
I do think the 16610 is a bit sexier and curvacious and has such an elegant transition to the bracelet. That said, I love the look of the ceramic and how it plays the light. I love the maxi dial and it's vastly improved lume, I love the feel of the 116610 on the wrist. I always wished the sub had a little more size and heft to it, but not as much as a Panerai for example. And, now it seems to fit the mold, and I love it! Although you can't go wrong, your going to appreciate the new upgrades more than your going to miss the old ones! |
|
8 August 2011, 11:36 AM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Jamie
Location: Georgia
Watch: Stainless Sub Date
Posts: 3,023
|
I absolutely love the 116610LN, but there is no way I will part with my Z-serial Sub for one. Mailman has a new thread going in which he intends to try out a new one, and I posted there that I will add one some day if I can, but I'm not flippin' for a new model. Each has their unique strengths, and I am happy with where I am currently.
__________________
SUBMARINER OWNERS' CLUB
ESTABLISHED 1953 TRF Member # 5464 |
8 August 2011, 09:31 PM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Rennes, FRANCE
Posts: 802
|
IMHO: Old bracelet is lighter, supercase is not as refined as the classic one.
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Assoc. of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons. |
8 August 2011, 09:50 PM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: bp, hu, eu
Watch: dj 16234, 116610ln
Posts: 2,376
|
the 16610 will never be a collector's piece there are tons out there still for sale.
__________________
16234 jubilee dial, 116610 ln, grand seiko sbgm221g, omega speedmaster mark II, longines legend diver, breguet 3910, nomos club campus 38, swatch sistem51, mares nemo, seiko ripley, g-shock rangeman instagram: modus_horologicus |
8 August 2011, 09:52 PM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: bp, hu, eu
Watch: dj 16234, 116610ln
Posts: 2,376
|
refined? isn't supposedly rolex a tool watch? i reckon the 116610 looks tres masculine.
__________________
16234 jubilee dial, 116610 ln, grand seiko sbgm221g, omega speedmaster mark II, longines legend diver, breguet 3910, nomos club campus 38, swatch sistem51, mares nemo, seiko ripley, g-shock rangeman instagram: modus_horologicus |
9 August 2011, 01:53 AM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Allen
Location: SC
Posts: 2,766
|
The difference in quality between the 16610 & the Sub C is very apparent. To say it's a worthy upgrade is a vast understatement.
|
9 August 2011, 04:28 AM | #49 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: Tissot
Posts: 1,454
|
Quite right, and I wasn't suggesting that it's ever going to be collectable. But a year ago, second hand 16610s were around £3000 - £3500, and now they are £3750 - £4300. So prices are rising, for whatever reason.
|
9 August 2011, 05:15 AM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: bp, hu, eu
Watch: dj 16234, 116610ln
Posts: 2,376
|
Because prices are rising and the gap between a new and a used one is almost constant.
__________________
16234 jubilee dial, 116610 ln, grand seiko sbgm221g, omega speedmaster mark II, longines legend diver, breguet 3910, nomos club campus 38, swatch sistem51, mares nemo, seiko ripley, g-shock rangeman instagram: modus_horologicus |
20 August 2011, 04:43 AM | #51 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: London
Posts: 47
|
Thanks for all your input and advice
I eventually decided to make the change and am more than happy I love the new sub c, it just feels like a better quality watch(IMHO) The relatively small upgrade cost was more than worth it!!! |
20 August 2011, 04:58 AM | #52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Allen
Location: SC
Posts: 2,766
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.