The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 7 August 2011, 09:19 AM   #31
masterdinh
"TRF" Member
 
masterdinh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Mexico
Watch: 116610-LV
Posts: 704
fitment

I honestly think the 16610 fits a hell of a lot better on the wrist then the new 116610's.

With that being said, I would still get the 116610 upgrade in a HEARTBEAT!

Do it if you can.
masterdinh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2011, 09:24 AM   #32
Eric88
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: 88 keys
Posts: 2,241
You may like to read this thread

You will probably benefit from this one as well

If it were me, I'd sell the 16610 to get a 16600
Eric88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2011, 09:59 AM   #33
z32turbo
"TRF" Member
 
z32turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sea Level
Watch: Varies
Posts: 6,877
I'd do it in a heartbeat as well. I much prefer the ceramic model to the non. Try it on before you decide based on any pics.
__________________


Instagram @z32turbo
z32turbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2011, 01:11 PM   #34
ncj
"TRF" Member
 
ncj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: USA
Watch: Sea Dweller 16600
Posts: 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric88 View Post
You may like to read this thread

You will probably benefit from this one as well

If it were me, I'd sell the 16610 to get a 16600
I was debating through similar issues: 16610 vs. 116610. Then, I finally decided to get the 16600 and I have no regrets!
ncj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2011, 01:14 PM   #35
Eric88
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: 88 keys
Posts: 2,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by ncj View Post
I was debating through similar issues: 16610 vs. 116610. Then, I finally decided to get the 16600 and I have no regrets!
I have owned all three of these and fully support the 16600 as the crown jewel of this nice selection.
Eric88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2011, 01:50 PM   #36
ElPrimero
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: London
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 168
The 16610 is dead, long live the 116610

ElPrimero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2011, 02:01 PM   #37
Warnsboy
"TRF" Member
 
Warnsboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Michael
Location: Midwest-USA
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,942
I Love my 16610
Warnsboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2011, 07:03 PM   #38
pp763
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: U.K
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 121
I've had the 16610 and without a shadow of a doubt prefer the 116610 however your sub is quite a special one in my opinion as it is one of the last to be made but to me the solid bracelet and new shape of the case are far better.
pp763 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2011, 10:42 PM   #39
never2late
"TRF" Member
 
never2late's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Jerry
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 827
If you must have the newer watch for some reason or another . . . go for it, the sub C is a great watch. However, if your sub is in good, sound condition don't upgrade just to get the newer watch. The old style sub is a great watch as well and will serve you for many, many more years. I'm fortunate enough to own one of each but I'd never get rid of either as each has its own unique appeal.
never2late is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 August 2011, 12:08 AM   #40
Mr. K
"TRF" Member
 
Mr. K's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Mark
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,078
I'd do it, the upgrades are wonderful!
Mr. K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 August 2011, 10:04 AM   #41
AIKO
"TRF" Member
 
AIKO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,937
Guys, have not been on in a while. Looks like fairly few ceramic LN's for sale on the Sale section. Is that an indication of the LN being more in demand in decent months?
AIKO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 August 2011, 10:11 AM   #42
Paracentesis
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: Tissot
Posts: 1,454
The Sub Cs are gathering dust in AD's windows around here. Meanwhile, the price of s/h 16610s is increasing nicely. I know which I prefer ;-)
Paracentesis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 August 2011, 11:13 AM   #43
drdenn
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Honey Rider
Location: San Diego
Watch: Rolex Sub C 116610
Posts: 143
Quote:
Originally Posted by tarmyjay View Post
Hi Guys

Just after your thought and opinions really

Still a bit of a Rolex novice

I am thinking of changing my current 2009 16610 Sub for one of the new models (with the ceramic bezel etc....)

Unfortunately, I cant afford to have both

What do you think????

Thanks in advance
I tried for months to convince myself to stick w/ the 16610, but kept falling deeper and deeper in love w/ the 116610.

I do think the 16610 is a bit sexier and curvacious and has such an elegant transition to the bracelet.

That said, I love the look of the ceramic and how it plays the light. I love the maxi dial and it's vastly improved lume, I love the feel of the 116610 on the wrist.

I always wished the sub had a little more size and heft to it, but not as much as a Panerai for example. And, now it seems to fit the mold, and I love it!

Although you can't go wrong, your going to appreciate the new upgrades more than your going to miss the old ones!
drdenn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 August 2011, 11:36 AM   #44
SSD
"TRF" Member
 
SSD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Jamie
Location: Georgia
Watch: Stainless Sub Date
Posts: 3,023
I absolutely love the 116610LN, but there is no way I will part with my Z-serial Sub for one. Mailman has a new thread going in which he intends to try out a new one, and I posted there that I will add one some day if I can, but I'm not flippin' for a new model. Each has their unique strengths, and I am happy with where I am currently.
__________________


SUBMARINER OWNERS' CLUB
ESTABLISHED 1953
TRF Member # 5464

SSD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 August 2011, 09:31 PM   #45
le_baroudeur
"TRF" Member
 
le_baroudeur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Rennes, FRANCE
Posts: 802
IMHO: Old bracelet is lighter, supercase is not as refined as the classic one.
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Assoc. of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons.
le_baroudeur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 August 2011, 09:50 PM   #46
speedo
"TRF" Member
 
speedo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: bp, hu, eu
Watch: dj 16234, 116610ln
Posts: 2,376
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paracentesis View Post
The Sub Cs are gathering dust in AD's windows around here. Meanwhile, the price of s/h 16610s is increasing nicely. I know which I prefer ;-)
the 16610 will never be a collector's piece there are tons out there still for sale.
__________________
16234 jubilee dial, 116610 ln, grand seiko sbgm221g, omega speedmaster mark II, longines legend diver, breguet 3910, nomos club campus 38, swatch sistem51, mares nemo, seiko ripley, g-shock rangeman

instagram: modus_horologicus
speedo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 August 2011, 09:52 PM   #47
speedo
"TRF" Member
 
speedo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: bp, hu, eu
Watch: dj 16234, 116610ln
Posts: 2,376
Quote:
Originally Posted by le_baroudeur View Post
IMHO: Old bracelet is lighter, supercase is not as refined as the classic one.
refined? isn't supposedly rolex a tool watch? i reckon the 116610 looks tres masculine.
__________________
16234 jubilee dial, 116610 ln, grand seiko sbgm221g, omega speedmaster mark II, longines legend diver, breguet 3910, nomos club campus 38, swatch sistem51, mares nemo, seiko ripley, g-shock rangeman

instagram: modus_horologicus
speedo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 August 2011, 01:53 AM   #48
HDHNTER
"TRF" Member
 
HDHNTER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Allen
Location: SC
Posts: 2,766
The difference in quality between the 16610 & the Sub C is very apparent. To say it's a worthy upgrade is a vast understatement.
HDHNTER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 August 2011, 04:28 AM   #49
Paracentesis
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: Tissot
Posts: 1,454
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedo View Post
the 16610 will never be a collector's piece there are tons out there still for sale.
Quite right, and I wasn't suggesting that it's ever going to be collectable. But a year ago, second hand 16610s were around £3000 - £3500, and now they are £3750 - £4300. So prices are rising, for whatever reason.
Paracentesis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 August 2011, 05:15 AM   #50
speedo
"TRF" Member
 
speedo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: bp, hu, eu
Watch: dj 16234, 116610ln
Posts: 2,376
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paracentesis View Post
Quite right, and I wasn't suggesting that it's ever going to be collectable. But a year ago, second hand 16610s were around £3000 - £3500, and now they are £3750 - £4300. So prices are rising, for whatever reason.
Because prices are rising and the gap between a new and a used one is almost constant.
__________________
16234 jubilee dial, 116610 ln, grand seiko sbgm221g, omega speedmaster mark II, longines legend diver, breguet 3910, nomos club campus 38, swatch sistem51, mares nemo, seiko ripley, g-shock rangeman

instagram: modus_horologicus
speedo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2011, 04:43 AM   #51
tarmyjay
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: London
Posts: 47
Thanks for all your input and advice

I eventually decided to make the change and am more than happy

I love the new sub c, it just feels like a better quality watch(IMHO)

The relatively small upgrade cost was more than worth it!!!
tarmyjay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2011, 04:58 AM   #52
HDHNTER
"TRF" Member
 
HDHNTER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Allen
Location: SC
Posts: 2,766
Quote:
Originally Posted by tarmyjay View Post
Thanks for all your input and advice

I eventually decided to make the change and am more than happy

I love the new sub c, it just feels like a better quality watch(IMHO)

The relatively small upgrade cost was more than worth it!!!
Congrats!!!
HDHNTER is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.