ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
28 August 2011, 08:41 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: California, USA
Posts: 30
|
Absolute Newbie Needs Help
I've got a few 'fine' watches, an Omega Seamaster, Seiko Ananta Spring Drive and an IWC Pilot Chrono.
So now I'm looking a acquiring a Rolex. I'm interested in Divers but a bit confused. I'm trying to get a handle on the differences between the Submariner and Deepsea (other than one seems to have a magnifier over the date and the other doesn't). And then I see reference to Sea Dweller as another model but don't see it on the Rolex website. As I look at the official Rolex website it's hard to compare them as the website in it's desire to be 'cool' is really making unwieldy and doesn't seem to work correctly in Safari. I've looked through the general information articles on this website, but what I guess I really need is a Rolex 101 article or maybe Rolex for Dummies. Can anyone point me to a good reference on the web? Thanks! |
28 August 2011, 08:50 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
Welcome to TRF.
Here you go...ye olde reference section of TRF: DeepSea http://www.rolexforums.com/showthrea...hlight=deepsea Submariner http://www.rolexforums.com/showthrea...ght=submariner Newest Submariner http://www.rolexforums.com/showthrea...ariner+ceramic Happy comparing!! |
28 August 2011, 09:12 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: California, USA
Posts: 30
|
I saw those files but re-reading them helps... so the real difference is that the Deep Sea is designed for deeper use?
(I don't expect my watches to be more than 10-20ft down, but it's nice not to have to worry about getting them wet, in the pool, etc. I haven't needed my helium relief valve on my Omega yet nor ever will) |
28 August 2011, 09:15 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
The Deep Sea is a HUGE watch / different design elements / different technology Vs. the Sub. Did you look at the size specs? Yes. It's meant for diving to depths you will never reach.
Have you tried these watches on? The differences make themselves apparent very quickly. |
28 August 2011, 09:46 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
|
You probably need to visit an AD and check them out personally. You be able to tell real easily after seeing them in person.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
28 August 2011, 09:49 AM | #6 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,006
|
X2!
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
28 August 2011, 09:51 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,424
|
The 40mm Sea-Dweller has now been replaced by the larger, heavier and more expensive 43 mm Deepsea Sea-Dweller.
The new version has a deeper dive rating (12,800 ft versus 4,000 ft previously), ceramic bezel and superior bracelet fitted with the new Glidelock clasp that enables small adjustments to the bracelet's length. Because of its size and weight, it has stirred controversy among Rolex fans, some of whom don't like it. Best to try it on yourself and see if it's a comfortable fit on your wrist. You could also consider the new Submariner (rating: 1,000 ft) which also has a ceramic bezel and an upgraded bracelet. |
28 August 2011, 09:56 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Abe
Location: eorše
Watch: out!!
Posts: 43
|
Rolex Site
|
28 August 2011, 09:59 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Serg
Location: US of A
Watch: AP
Posts: 7,437
|
So is the sub in all likelihood ...
__________________
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat???? |
28 August 2011, 11:08 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: PNW
Watch: DS,BLNR,SubLV,DJ2
Posts: 8,123
|
Go with the model that sings to you the best!
|
28 August 2011, 01:40 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Manalapan Florida
Watch: Tridor Masterpiece
Posts: 2,819
|
My deep sea is not very comfortable .... my 16613 Submariner is comfortable and looks great .... good luck with what ever watch you choose .... Congrats, and welcome to the Rolex family
|
28 August 2011, 01:58 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Darren
Location: Minnetonka
Watch: DeepSeaSeaDweller
Posts: 13
|
I just got a Deep Sea...
And i love it. I am a big boy, 6'3" and 200 something and I am used to wearing large watches and it works great for me. But it did take a few weeks for me to get used to the height, as it does stand very tall on your wrist. Try them on in person and the decision will be much easier. I believe that I am in the minority with the size of the DSSD (Deep Sea Sea Dweller) and how I enjoy the large size. I have only been down to 7000 feet below sea level on a casual dive but you never know, you may need that extra league or two!:)
|
28 August 2011, 02:44 PM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
Quote:
So what do you think? Hope you feel TRF is a good reference site. |
|
28 August 2011, 03:18 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Joey
Location: around the Bay
Watch: ing TRF
Posts: 1,942
|
You got all the experts here! and good luck for your search!
|
28 August 2011, 04:30 PM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Andy
Location: East Midlands, UK
Watch: Patek and Rolex
Posts: 1,074
|
Quote:
|
|
29 August 2011, 04:34 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Darren
Location: Minnetonka
Watch: DeepSeaSeaDweller
Posts: 13
|
I am no diver. Just making fun of the ridiculous depth rating.
Xxx
|
29 August 2011, 05:05 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Mr. Bill
Location: South Florida
Watch: 16610
Posts: 6,148
|
Everyone has their preferences. For me 16610 Sub!
Classic style - no maxi anything.
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of the Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons - ID # 13 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.