The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 5 August 2007, 02:20 PM   #1
LioK
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Lionel
Location: Singapore
Watch: On my wrist
Posts: 53
Over Winding??

I've had my ExpII white dial for almost 2 months now and decided to give it the 40 winds (1st time i've done this to my watch). I did this 2 days ago and it seems that my second hand is running like 10 secs faster, on the average, than what it used to.

Is it possible that i have over-wound it? Or is this just normal for the next few days after winding it up, the watch being mechanical and all?

Anyone else experience this?
LioK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 August 2007, 02:26 PM   #2
triton
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Singapore
Posts: 156
i don't think it is possible to over-wind a watch as most if not all automatic watches have a overwind protection mechanism to prevent breaking mainspring once fully wound
triton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 August 2007, 02:26 PM   #3
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Most modern automatic watches today have a slipping clutch mechanism built in which prevents overwinding of the watch.

Try out the watch for a few days. If you think it's gaining time, try placing it crown DOWN at night and check the results.

Good luck - JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 August 2007, 02:33 PM   #4
triton
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Singapore
Posts: 156
read somewhere before.

not sure if it is correct.

crown down - lose time
crown up - gain time
face down - maintain time
triton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 August 2007, 02:48 PM   #5
LioK
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Lionel
Location: Singapore
Watch: On my wrist
Posts: 53
Thanks JJ. Thanks Triton.

Will try out with the crown down the next few nights and see how it goes.
LioK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 August 2007, 03:21 PM   #6
Nick Hacko
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: .
Posts: 274

Last edited by Nick Hacko; 28 August 2007 at 10:23 PM..
Nick Hacko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 August 2007, 06:27 PM   #7
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick Hacko View Post
Actually ALL automatic watches - vintage and modern - are fitted with "slipping clutch mechanism" (mainspring with no hook at the end plus bit of extra tension spring)
Thanks, Nick!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 August 2007, 08:43 PM   #8
SPACE-DWELLER
"TRF" Member
 
SPACE-DWELLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
Most modern automatic watches today have a slipping clutch mechanism built in which prevents overwinding of the watch.

Try out the watch for a few days. If you think it's gaining time, try placing it crown DOWN at night and check the results.

Good luck - JJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by triton View Post
read somewhere before.

not sure if it is correct.

crown down - lose time
crown up - gain time
face down - maintain time
In fact it is:

Watch placed horizontally: gain some seconds
Crown down: lose a few seconds
Crown up: lose some more seconds

__________________
With kind regards, Bo

LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...
SPACE-DWELLER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 August 2007, 08:56 PM   #9
Alcan
2024 Pledge Member
 
Alcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Al
Location: Way Up North
Watch: your P's & Q's
Posts: 10,473
Lionel, give this a try.





__________________
Member #1,315

I don't want to get technical, but according to chemistry alcohol IS a solution!
Alcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 August 2007, 09:04 PM   #10
alexcord
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: UK
Watch: Maxi SS GMT II
Posts: 117
I am sure that my new GMT II loses seconds no matter which way I place it at night??!
alexcord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 August 2007, 09:25 PM   #11
SPACE-DWELLER
"TRF" Member
 
SPACE-DWELLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spacedweller View Post
In fact it is:

Watch placed horizontally: gain some seconds
Crown down: lose a few seconds
Crown up: lose some more seconds

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alcan View Post
Lionel, give this a try.



Yup, that is the one I was referring to. I am at work again, so couldn't just get it from my "Favourites". I am glad I remembered correctly, though. At the moment, I am experimenting this "watch position" theory out on my Sub Date that gains just under 2 secs a day. But sometimes I have to look that sheet of paper with the info about it up to know what positions is best to have it lose some seconds during the night. I guess I must have memorized it at last!

BTW: I had an interesting talk with Mike about this, and his theory is that the "NEW" 31XX movements have a tendancy to NOT really react to positions whereas the most recent Cal. 3186 GMT seems to have that tendancy.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo

LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...
SPACE-DWELLER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 August 2007, 09:42 PM   #12
triton
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Singapore
Posts: 156
thanks for the correction of placement of watch positions.
triton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 August 2007, 09:50 PM   #13
LioK
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Lionel
Location: Singapore
Watch: On my wrist
Posts: 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spacedweller View Post
Yup, that is the one I was referring to. I am at work again, so couldn't just get it from my "Favourites". I am glad I remembered correctly, though. At the moment, I am experimenting this "watch position" theory out on my Sub Date that gains just under 2 secs a day. But sometimes I have to look that sheet of paper with the info about it up to know what positions is best to have it lose some seconds during the night. I guess I must have memorized it at last!

BTW: I had an interesting talk with Mike about this, and his theory is that the "NEW" 31XX movements have a tendancy to NOT really react to positions whereas the most recent Cal. 3186 GMT seems to have that tendancy.

Thanks BO, memory served you right. And thanks ALCAN for the confirmation.
Guess i'll definitely be always checking on the accuracy of the second hand before placing it down for the night.

But what the hell, i've already been keeping up like at least 4 nights a week just to see how many minutes past midnight before the date jumps. So far, fastest is 1min 15secs, and the slowest was 4mins 10secs. From what i have observed, it seems to have to do with the hour and 24-hour hand lining up at midnight before the date jumps. Still trying to correct that.

Come to think of it, should have dealt with the date jump first before taking on this minute and second hand issue.

Any tips on correcting the accuracy on the date jump?
LioK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 August 2007, 10:16 PM   #14
Nick Hacko
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: .
Posts: 274

Last edited by Nick Hacko; 28 August 2007 at 10:23 PM..
Nick Hacko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 August 2007, 10:20 PM   #15
alexcord
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: UK
Watch: Maxi SS GMT II
Posts: 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by alexcord View Post
I am sure that my new GMT II loses seconds no matter which way I place it at night??!
Any comments?
alexcord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 August 2007, 01:03 AM   #16
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by alexcord View Post
Any comments?
Sure..

The more modern and smooth running an automatic watch is, the less positional regulating has any affect..

If your brand spanking new GMT II is a couple of seconds slow, consistently, and positional regulation does nothing, you have a very well constructed and balanced time piece.

If it really bothers you, I would wait a few month and see if it "settles down" to something better. Or take a shot at regulation.....they can be zeroed in pretty good if you don't mind a few tries...

Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 August 2007, 03:11 AM   #17
alexcord
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: UK
Watch: Maxi SS GMT II
Posts: 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
Sure..

The more modern and smooth running an automatic watch is, the less positional regulating has any affect..

If your brand spanking new GMT II is a couple of seconds slow, consistently, and positional regulation does nothing, you have a very well constructed and balanced time piece.

If it really bothers you, I would wait a few month and see if it "settles down" to something better. Or take a shot at regulation.....they can be zeroed in pretty good if you don't mind a few tries...

Hi Tools, no I am happy with it's consistency but would just have been a nifty way of maintaining accuracy by changing the way I place it.

I wonder how other new GMT II owners are getting on?

Cheers

Alex
alexcord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 August 2007, 05:17 AM   #18
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by alexcord View Post
Hi Tools, no I am happy with it's consistency but would just have been a nifty way of maintaining accuracy by changing the way I place it.

I wonder how other new GMT II owners are getting on?

Cheers

Alex

Glad you're happy I would be too.....

You can easily tell if you overwind it...Here is how it looks:

Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 August 2007, 05:57 AM   #19
alexcord
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: UK
Watch: Maxi SS GMT II
Posts: 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
Glad you're happy I would be too.....

You can easily tell if you overwind it...Here is how it looks:


alexcord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 August 2007, 08:25 AM   #20
LioK
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Lionel
Location: Singapore
Watch: On my wrist
Posts: 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick Hacko View Post
Forget it!
Thanks Nick.
That coming from you means i wouldn't have to worry bout it from now.
LioK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.