ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Prince · 21 September 2011, 12:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Welshwatchman

Safely assuming ultra Rich to be a billionaire.

I'd probably be too busy "looking after business" to be bothered with watches.

I'd go the way of the Slim probably and wear something gifted by one of my middle managers looking to brown nose the CEO.

... or a Patek 5140 J, such a wonderful watch. You don't even have to be slightly rich to afford one of those though.

Now Paul. You KNOW you would be wearing one of these!

MonBK · 21 September 2011, 12:02 AM

[QUOTE=Prince;2750346]Now Paul. You KNOW you would be wearing one of these!

QUOTE]

My Prince, long time no see, good to see you back.

4therightcause · 21 September 2011, 01:21 AM

I think this would be one of several "The world on your wrist"

CapitalIQ · 21 September 2011, 01:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Megalobyte

Well if I were ultra rich I wouldn't wear a nice watch. I'd have 4 men with me at all times, each one responsible for shouting out one digit of the time. And a woman who says AM or PM at the end, and has a latte machine on a pushcart. They would all wear Pateks synced each morning to an Atomic G Shock, that I would wear, to make sure they're correct, and the Pateks are keeping good time.

drtooth73 · 21 September 2011, 01:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4therightcause

I think this would be one of several "The world on your wrist"

That is a sweet watch.
It's also the one for the "investment" thread.
was $35K, now over $200K.

Welshwatchman · 21 September 2011, 02:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prince

Now Paul. You KNOW you would be wearing one of these!

Quote:

Originally Posted by MonBK

My Prince, long time no see, good to see you back.

He came back in especially to pimp-my-post.

I am spoilt, truly.

Onikage · 21 September 2011, 02:31 AM

I have a helper monkey.

T-Rip · 21 September 2011, 02:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Welshwatchman

He came back in especially to pimp-my-post.

I am spoilt, truly.

Im sorry but that is one fugly watch..IMO

Welshwatchman · 21 September 2011, 02:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by haydendillon

Im sorry but that is one fugly watch..IMO

.... and there's all the rest of us thinking it is a real beauty.

dnagwhogas · 21 September 2011, 03:20 AM

I guess money can't buy ____________. (fill in the blanks)

GradyPhilpott · 21 September 2011, 06:09 AM

I'm just not in that category and never will be, so I couldn't even begin to imagine what I might fancy if I had such wealth.

I do like the Masterpiece, but without all the stones.

Rollie2011 · 21 September 2011, 06:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZackAaron

Toys For The Ultra Rich!

what are your thoughts and lets see what your favorite piece is at any price

Mines the Platinum Masterpiece Meteorite Diamond Dial

Wow

Not my cup of tea

Prince · 21 September 2011, 07:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MonBK

My Prince, long time no see, good to see you back.

I only know one person that calls me that.

Prince · 21 September 2011, 07:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Welshwatchman

He came back in especially to pimp-my-post.

I am spoilt, truly.

Absolutely especially for that, Paul my friend!

Prince · 21 September 2011, 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by haydendillon

Im sorry but that is one fugly watch..IMO

No question about that, Tom!

bayerische · 21 September 2011, 07:56 AM

Only the OP is UR.

chicfarmer1 · 21 September 2011, 08:41 AM

The few ultra rich I've come to know a little (old money, not the new) are often incredibly modest in their personal presentation. They prefer to start botanical gardens in a city, or build hospitals and fund causes, and travel. One such woman wears a small gold Ebel watch she's had forever. It looks fine to her. I shouldn't second guess that.

esm · 21 September 2011, 08:53 AM

Interesting one.

"Toys" - hey? I only see one watch (ie. One "toy")

Wouldn't seeing some wrist pix of that piece.

If that is the watch for the Ultra Rich... I'm wondering what Filthy Rich people would wear?!? (same watch, but in a much bigger size?

)

gwalker · 21 September 2011, 09:39 AM

PP 5002 for $1.5m. Honestly if I was so rich everything was obtainable I would own a few Rolexs like a WG SubC, all gold GMT with the green face and a few of the SS models but I would go elsewhere and get some grand complications. The Rolex mvt is A workhorse. Not very sophisticated if you ask me.

RolexDaytona91 · 21 September 2011, 10:06 AM

I like shiny.

7sins · 21 September 2011, 10:45 AM

pp 5146

Wildwing · 21 September 2011, 10:53 AM

Nothing wrong with that bracelet.

MortgageGuy · 21 September 2011, 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dingoo93

...? I'd take one of each of these!!

LV-c is mine, The WG is the one i'd have...

Maybe a GMT ICE?....

....

If only?!!

I am with you on this one, one of each works for me too Dino

sarir97 · 21 September 2011, 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by capote

+1

If I was "ultra rich" I would have bought a Patek instead. I would prefer to pay for complications instead of bling-bling.

+2

Jinder · 21 September 2011, 01:51 PM

apeogre · 21 September 2011, 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Onikage

I have a helper monkey.

That's awesome! I would train one to throw poo at annoying people.

007bond · 21 September 2011, 02:10 PM

Ladies and gentlemen, such pieces aren't for super rich, they're for super smart: as more dollars are printed, the more sense it makes to acquire!!!

wcl884 · 21 September 2011, 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Megalobyte

Well if I were ultra rich I wouldn't wear a nice watch. I'd have 4 men with me at all times, each one responsible for shouting out one digit of the time. And a woman who says AM or PM at the end, and has a latte machine on a pushcart. They would all wear Pateks synced each morning to an Atomic G Shock, that I would wear, to make sure they're correct, and the Pateks are keeping good time.

I would just have 2 people, instead of 4. I would do the same thing, except I would women instead of men following me around, preferably Jessica Alba and Jessica Biel.

The Waddler · 21 September 2011, 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wcl884

I would just have 2 people, instead of 4. I would do the same thing, except I would women instead of men following me around, preferably Jessica Alba and Jessica Biel.

knowing my luck I'd just end up with Jessica Fletcher

21 September 2011, 01:21 AM	#33
4therightcause "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Real Name: Aaron Wolf Location: Naples Florida Watch: 116500 Black Posts: 267	"The world on your wrist" I think this would be one of several "The world on your wrist" Attached Images

21 September 2011, 02:31 AM	#37
Onikage "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: England Watch: 16710, 16628 Posts: 7,757	I have a helper monkey. __________________ GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4

21 September 2011, 03:20 AM	#40
dnagwhogas "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Real Name: MauiBacerdo Location: Chicago Watch: N :Learn Posts: 902	I guess money can't buy ____________. (fill in the blanks) __________________ P-Club Member # 7 Time is what prevents everything from happening at once.

21 September 2011, 06:09 AM	#41
GradyPhilpott 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: New Mexico Watch: Seiko #SRK050 Posts: 34,460	I'm just not in that category and never will be, so I couldn't even begin to imagine what I might fancy if I had such wealth. I do like the Masterpiece, but without all the stones. __________________ JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner

21 September 2011, 07:56 AM	#46
bayerische "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Andreas Location: Margaritaville Watch: Smurf Posts: 19,879	Only the OP is UR. __________________ Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

21 September 2011, 12:02 AM	#32
MonBK Banned Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Kingstown Posts: 58,279	[QUOTE=Prince;2750346]Now Paul. You KNOW you would be wearing one of these! QUOTE] My Prince, long time no see, good to see you back.

21 September 2011, 08:41 AM	#47
chicfarmer1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Real Name: J Location: USA Midwest Watch: Midsize Datejust Posts: 2,611	The few ultra rich I've come to know a little (old money, not the new) are often incredibly modest in their personal presentation. They prefer to start botanical gardens in a city, or build hospitals and fund causes, and travel. One such woman wears a small gold Ebel watch she's had forever. It looks fine to her. I shouldn't second guess that.

21 September 2011, 08:53 AM	#48
esm "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Eric Location: Location,Location Watch: this, bro... Posts: 15,340	Interesting one. "Toys" - hey? I only see one watch (ie. One "toy") Wouldn't seeing some wrist pix of that piece. If that is the watch for the Ultra Rich... I'm wondering what Filthy Rich people would wear?!? (same watch, but in a much bigger size? )

21 September 2011, 09:39 AM	#49
gwalker "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Real Name: Gunter Location: AL/NJ Watch: DSSD; 116610LN Posts: 5,509	PP 5002 for $1.5m. Honestly if I was so rich everything was obtainable I would own a few Rolexs like a WG SubC, all gold GMT with the green face and a few of the SS models but I would go elsewhere and get some grand complications. The Rolex mvt is A workhorse. Not very sophisticated if you ask me.

21 September 2011, 10:06 AM	#50
RolexDaytona91 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Real Name: Andrew Location: Sault Ste. Marie Posts: 61	I like shiny.

21 September 2011, 10:45 AM	#51
7sins "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Real Name: B. Location: Beverly Hills, CA Posts: 3,622	pp 5146

21 September 2011, 10:53 AM	#52
Wildwing "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Virginia, USA Posts: 593	Nothing wrong with that bracelet.

21 September 2011, 01:51 PM	#55
Jinder Banned Join Date: Sep 2010 Real Name: Jinder Location: Ontario Watch: 116713 Posts: 601

21 September 2011, 02:10 PM	#57
007bond "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: EARTH Watch: Rolex Posts: 135	Ladies and gentlemen, such pieces aren't for super rich, they're for super smart: as more dollars are printed, the more sense it makes to acquire!!!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)