ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

samgyetang · 19 August 2007, 05:51 PM

Hi, thank to all that have helped me.
I have noticed that the lettering on most Oysterdate Precision dials looks like image one, where the word 'Rolex' is shorter in length and than the 'oysterdate' script below.

But as with image 2, the 'oysterdate' is more closely spaced and falls within the length of the "Rolex' script.

Is there a reason for this, a right and a wrong, or just different years, different designs? As always, I appreciate the help.

BiG JeEzY · 19 August 2007, 07:01 PM

I like to say that they are two different versions but I am really not 100 percent sure. I am pretty confident they are two versions though. The vintage experts from this forum will be able to help you out with your question.

Other then that, cheers!!

jac67 · 19 August 2007, 10:55 PM

The watch in the first (top) picture above has been re-dialled.

Firstly, the minute markers go through the coronet at 12 o'clock.

Next, the printing of SWISS MADE has been added. It should not have this on it.

It should read SWISS - T < 25, and placement should be below the 6 o'clock marker.

John.

SPACE-DWELLER · 19 August 2007, 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jac67

The watch in the first (top) picture above has been re-dialled.

Firstly, the minute markers go through the coronet at 12 o'clock.

Next, the printing of SWISS MADE has been added. It should not have this on it.

It should read SWISS - T < 25, and placement should be below the 6 o'clock marker.

John.

John, I think you are right.

Read about "Luminous marker" nomenclature here:

http://www.oysterinfo.de/de/detailin...asse/index.php

samgyetang · 19 August 2007, 11:21 PM

Thanks John, but what is your opinion regarding the second images Rolex and Oysterdate spacing? Why do the 2 differ? I think the second images style isn't as common...

jac67 · 19 August 2007, 11:51 PM

Yes, I have also noticed these two variances.

Both look ok, but I'm not 100% sure.

Padi may be able to help more.

Hope it helps.

John.

samgyetang · 20 August 2007, 09:12 AM

Thanks John.

Padi, do you have any information here please?

19 August 2007, 05:51 PM	#1
samgyetang "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: South Korea Posts: 10	Just a question on Oysterdate dial... Hi, thank to all that have helped me. I have noticed that the lettering on most Oysterdate Precision dials looks like image one, where the word 'Rolex' is shorter in length and than the 'oysterdate' script below. But as with image 2, the 'oysterdate' is more closely spaced and falls within the length of the "Rolex' script. Is there a reason for this, a right and a wrong, or just different years, different designs? As always, I appreciate the help. Attached Images

19 August 2007, 07:01 PM	#2
BiG JeEzY "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Jerome Location: N. California Watch: GMT I/EXP II/DJ Posts: 3,351	I like to say that they are two different versions but I am really not 100 percent sure. I am pretty confident they are two versions though. The vintage experts from this forum will be able to help you out with your question. Other then that, cheers!! __________________ -Rolex Explorer II Black dial 16570 (circa 2001) -Rolex GMT Master I Pepsi 1675 (circa 1978) -Rolex Datejust TT Champagne 16233 (circa 1991) -Vintage Longines Automatic La Grande Classique -Vintage Seiko 6138 Automatic Chronograph with "Kakume" Dial

19 August 2007, 10:55 PM	#3
jac67 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: John Location: Australia Watch: Me Posts: 1,950	The watch in the first (top) picture above has been re-dialled. Firstly, the minute markers go through the coronet at 12 o'clock. Next, the printing of SWISS MADE has been added. It should not have this on it. It should read SWISS - T < 25, and placement should be below the 6 o'clock marker. John.

19 August 2007, 11:21 PM	#5
samgyetang "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: South Korea Posts: 10	Thanks John, but what is your opinion regarding the second images Rolex and Oysterdate spacing? Why do the 2 differ? I think the second images style isn't as common...

19 August 2007, 11:51 PM	#6
jac67 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: John Location: Australia Watch: Me Posts: 1,950	Yes, I have also noticed these two variances. Both look ok, but I'm not 100% sure. Padi may be able to help more. Hope it helps. John.

20 August 2007, 09:12 AM	#7
samgyetang "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: South Korea Posts: 10	Thanks John. Padi, do you have any information here please?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)