ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
2 November 2011, 01:44 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Up a tree
Posts: 4,001
|
I never thought it would happen.......
But I have decided that after all these year of owning Subs and Sea Dwellers I need a change.
I have my eye on a White dial SS Zenith Daytona. So at least one watch has to go. But which ones??? The 1665? The Matt 666? The 16600? ???????? |
2 November 2011, 01:46 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex Explorer I
Posts: 10,278
|
16600!
|
2 November 2011, 01:50 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,689
|
+1, think the 16600.
__________________
Last thing I remember, I was Running outta sight I had to find the passage back,To the place I was before. ’Relax,’ said this Rolex place,We are programmed to receive. You can checkout any time you like, But you can never leave! |
2 November 2011, 02:02 PM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
|
16600, no doubt, that could always be replaced in the future
|
2 November 2011, 02:13 PM | #5 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Rob
Location: Nearby.
Posts: 24,931
|
Clay, it's god to see you branching out, but to sell one of those watches is nothing short of blasphemy!!!!
No doubt you'll move the one you're less attached to (why not!), and best of luck on your hunt for the Zenith Daytona!
__________________
He who wears a Rolex is always on time, even when late!! TRF's "After Dark" Bar & Nightclub Patron-Founding Member.. |
2 November 2011, 02:18 PM | #6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
|
You know the answer Clay - sell ME the 16660 matte! :-)
Otherwise, sell the SD 16600. Sure, it will get the least amount of money of the three but as said above, it is easier to replace. |
2 November 2011, 02:28 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Joey
Location: around the Bay
Watch: ing TRF
Posts: 1,942
|
16600... good luck Clay!
|
2 November 2011, 02:55 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Pete
Location: Arizona
Watch: ing Duke bball
Posts: 1,488
|
Why get rid of any of them?
|
2 November 2011, 04:31 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: *
Posts: 2,323
|
16600.
__________________
Member# 52,675 Est. 3/2011 |
2 November 2011, 06:45 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Australia
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 165
|
Definitely the 16600!
|
2 November 2011, 07:01 PM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Up a tree
Posts: 4,001
|
|
2 November 2011, 07:35 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2,895
|
I knew it would only be a matter of time ...... !!!
I've followed your collecting for a few years across on TZ. I think you like the thrill of the chase |
2 November 2011, 08:31 PM | #13 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,006
|
16600 if you have to sell one Clay!
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
2 November 2011, 09:08 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
|
Just don't get rid of the 1665. You would have a really hard time replacing that one in that kind of shape. Good luck.
__________________
Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY |
2 November 2011, 09:51 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Duy
Location: New Orleans, LA
Watch: Speedmaster 3861
Posts: 1,925
|
If I have to pick one. I would choose the 16600 as well.
__________________
De gustibus non est disputandum. |
2 November 2011, 10:21 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Philip
Location: NY
Posts: 851
|
Wow! Sweet, what made you come to this decision? How did you consider it?
Is there a particular Daytona that made you consider your next acqusition? |
2 November 2011, 10:21 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Philip
Location: NY
Posts: 851
|
Wow! Sweet, what made you come to this decision?
Is there a particular Daytona that made you consider your next acqusition? |
2 November 2011, 10:31 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Jeremy
Location: Louisiana
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,732
|
16600
__________________
As a man is, so he sees. As the eye is formed, such are its powers. William Blake |
2 November 2011, 11:07 PM | #19 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,391
|
Rolex 16600
|
2 November 2011, 11:43 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Piedmont, CA
Watch: various vintage
Posts: 2,272
|
You're asking the wrong subforum group if you were hoping for an answer other than the 16600.......
__________________
1680 MK II 2.2M (my daily); 1655 MK IV 8.1M (my 1st vintage); 16660 x 4 - 8.0M spider & matte 7.4M, 8.0M, 8.0M; 16610LV F MK I/MK I; 116528 Z; 14060 M COSC; Tudor 75090 Gone.....never forgotten: 14000 F, 14060 V COSC, PAM 048, 16623 F, 1680 MK V 3.1M, 16800 matte 8.3M & 1655 MK IV 7.4M |
3 November 2011, 12:57 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Boston
Posts: 3,177
|
Good choice w/ the 16520 Clay - get rid of the 16600, you can always get that again whenever.
__________________
"Oh, you give a f****' aspirin a headache, pal!" |
3 November 2011, 01:13 AM | #22 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Pav
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 11,495
|
I am with everyone else.... 16600.
Best of luck with the Daytona! |
3 November 2011, 01:32 AM | #23 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Up a tree
Posts: 4,001
|
I can't say I'm surprised by your responses....LOL
|
3 November 2011, 02:03 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Pete
Location: Arizona
Watch: ing Duke bball
Posts: 1,488
|
Hey Clay, I guess I meant...seems like such a hassle to have to decide that you may want to consider keeping them all.
However, considering the pieces, I'd agree with the rest: 16600 would be my choice. Sorry about my poor attempt at humor Pete |
3 November 2011, 04:42 AM | #25 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Up a tree
Posts: 4,001
|
Quote:
No worries You do have a point. We will have to see??? |
|
3 November 2011, 06:01 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lancs. England
Posts: 1,000
|
|
3 November 2011, 06:13 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Michael
Location: Midwest-USA
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,942
|
16600 for sure
|
3 November 2011, 08:10 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Rick
Location: London, Ont.
Posts: 666
|
like everyone else said the 16600. All the best!
|
3 November 2011, 08:15 AM | #29 |
TechXpert
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Tylden Reed
Location: Kent UK
Watch: GMTII and more
Posts: 175
|
Whichever you decide to sell - you'll regret it!
Find something else to sell - anything but a Rolex you've enjoyed owning. Tylden. |
3 November 2011, 08:19 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Mr. H
Location: Dallas
Watch: them for me!
Posts: 7,180
|
I personally love all your watches. So depending on which one you decide on letting go I can offer my home as its next home!!!!
__________________
WATCHES ARE THE NEW CURRENCY!/ MEMBER 27491/OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED OLD TIMER /AP OWNERS CLUB MEMBER Instagram @watchcollectinglifestyle |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.