The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > General Topics > Open Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21 January 2012, 05:42 AM   #31
masterserg
"TRF" Member
 
masterserg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Serg
Location: US of A
Watch: AP
Posts: 7,437
Check out Ken Rockwell for one of his (good) rants about Kodak.

The gist of it: Chapter 11 is just a scam to escape financial obligations. The company will be fine. I guess that's true.
__________________
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat????
masterserg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2012, 05:47 AM   #32
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
I haven't read Rockwell's article yet, but it is almost certain that Kodak will renege on their commitment to healthcare coverage for retirees, which may or may not be underhanded. It is however legal.

Also, the whole purpose of Chapter 11 bankruptcy is to protect oneself from creditors, so that kind of goes without saying, however, according to what I've read, Kodak has secured a loan of close to one billion dollars to help pay off their creditors.

And yes, Kodak will survive.

Let's just hope that this time they really get on the stick and start being competitive with their products.
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 February 2012, 02:47 AM   #33
masterserg
"TRF" Member
 
masterserg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Serg
Location: US of A
Watch: AP
Posts: 7,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott View Post

And yes, Kodak will survive.
Not sure about this one anymore ... they just announced they are out of the camera business ... What are they left with? Printers and commercial printing??

Sad.
__________________
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat????
masterserg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 February 2012, 03:42 AM   #34
MoBe
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 6,773
I would be surprised if Kodak managed to survive.
MoBe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 February 2012, 10:08 AM   #35
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
I would have rather seen Kodak start building high-quality cameras, instead of relying on their reputation to compensate for mediocrity, but this is the choice they chosen and it may well work out for them.

Of course, once they've restructured and rehabilitated their image, there won't be any limits on where they might go as a company.

I wouldn't count Kodak out just yet.
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 February 2012, 10:40 AM   #36
davestan
"TRF" Member
 
davestan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 504
A company that made very bad business and marketing decisions backed up with a poor research model! Unbelievable that a company that was at the forefront of digital technology did not embrace it in a visionary way. They had an iconic name brand also. The "clunky" products and stodgy technology they were releasing while other companies were racing ahead!
davestan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 February 2012, 02:14 PM   #37
MoBe
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 6,773
Quote:
Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott View Post
I would have rather seen Kodak start building high-quality cameras, instead of relying on their reputation to compensate for mediocrity, but this is the choice they chosen and it may well work out for them.

Of course, once they've restructured and rehabilitated their image, there won't be any limits on where they might go as a company.

I wouldn't count Kodak out just yet.
I would like to see your faith justified but I can`t see how the company can continue,I think it`s gonna have to be some kind of miracle.
MoBe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 February 2012, 11:48 PM   #38
TheDude
"TRF" Member
 
TheDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: DC Area, USA
Watch: IIc,1680 Red,16660
Posts: 4,492
Quote:
Originally Posted by davestan View Post
A company that made very bad business and marketing decisions backed up with a poor research model! Unbelievable that a company that was at the forefront of digital technology did not embrace it in a visionary way. They had an iconic name brand also. The "clunky" products and stodgy technology they were releasing while other companies were racing ahead!
That's not really fair. There are market dynamics that are well understood today that simply hadn't even been theorized yet when they began those first fatal steps.

Clayton M. Christensen wrote the definitive book on the subject, "The Innovator's Dilemma". His concepts of disruptive innovation/technologies are something good business managers understand now, but they didn't exist when Kodak could still control its future.

Kodak didn't see the writing on wall because it literally hadn't been written yet.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
TheDude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 February 2012, 11:57 PM   #39
bayerische
"TRF" Member
 
bayerische's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
I think they cash in pretty good on their patents alone.
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
bayerische is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2012, 07:42 AM   #40
Thurnau
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Metairie, LA
Watch: DateJust
Posts: 738
Quote:
Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott View Post
I would have rather seen Kodak start building high-quality cameras, instead of relying on their reputation to compensate for mediocrity, but this is the choice they chosen and it may well work out for them.

Of course, once they've restructured and rehabilitated their image, there won't be any limits on where they might go as a company.

I wouldn't count Kodak out just yet.
I think they already sold off their high quality image sensor business. I think they made the high quality sensors that went into medium format cameras like hasselblad.
Thurnau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2012, 09:37 AM   #41
oneillba
"TRF" Member
 
oneillba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: Hamilton, MI USA
Watch: My beloved TT DJ
Posts: 3,831
Remember those old Poloroids? I loved the smell of the "fixer" stick that you used to rub over the photo so it wouldn't smudge.
__________________

My Trusty TT DJ
oneillba is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.